• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发用于护理循证实践实施与可持续性的团体组织学习活动量表。

Development of a Group Organizational Learning Activity Inventory for the Implementation and Sustainability of Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing.

作者信息

Ishii Keiko, Takemura Yukie, Ichikawa Naoko

机构信息

Department of Nursing Administration, Division of Health Sciences and Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Nursing Department, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Nurs Manag. 2023 Aug 21;2023:8584029. doi: 10.1155/2023/8584029. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1155/2023/8584029
PMID:40225633
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11919175/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to develop a group organizational learning activity inventory for evidence-based practice (EBP) institutionalized by hospitals and to verify its reliability and validity.

METHODS

A draft inventory was created after verifying content and face validity of draft items developed based on interview data and materials used in EBP implementation. Construct validity and reliability were assessed cross-sectionally through an anonymous self-administered survey conducted via web and printed questionnaires. Construct validity was confirmed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, and internal consistency and convergent/discriminant validity were verified. Inventory structure was determined using the theoretical model based on the hypothetical constructive concept. Temporal stability was assessed two weeks after the initial survey.

RESULT

A draft inventory comprising 12 factors and 47 items was created based on 95 draft items. Data from 371 nurses across 55 departments in 12 hospitals were analyzed. The inventory comprised 8 factors and 40 items based on the theoretical model. The comparative fit index was 0.86, the Tucker-Lewis index was 0.85, the root mean square error of approximation was 0.09, and standardized root mean square was 0.04. Cronbach's alpha of each factor was ≥0.8, and the temporal stability was moderate.

CONCLUSION

We developed the group organizational learning activity inventory, comprising 8 factors and 40 items. Though construct validity was low, the reliability and concurrent/convergent validities were confirmed. This inventory contains new factors that measure the group activities to ensure EBP's continuation in hospitals: forming common knowledge, understanding the value of EBP in groups, and fostering ownership thereof. Using this inventory, departments that introduced EBP can evaluate the extent of activities leading to nurses' continuation of EBP and find the improvement point.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在开发一份用于医院实施循证实践(EBP)的团体组织学习活动量表,并验证其信效度。

方法

基于访谈数据和EBP实施中使用的材料,在验证初稿项目的内容效度和表面效度后创建了量表初稿。通过网络和纸质问卷进行的匿名自填式横断面调查评估结构效度和信度。使用探索性和验证性因素分析确认结构效度,并验证内部一致性以及收敛效度/区分效度。基于假设构建概念的理论模型确定量表结构。在初次调查两周后评估时间稳定性。

结果

基于95个初稿项目创建了包含12个因素和47个条目的量表初稿。对12家医院55个科室的371名护士的数据进行了分析。基于理论模型,该量表包含8个因素和40个条目。比较拟合指数为0.86,塔克-刘易斯指数为0.85,近似误差均方根为0.09,标准化均方根为0.04。各因素的克朗巴哈系数≥0.8,时间稳定性中等。

结论

我们开发了包含8个因素和40个条目的团体组织学习活动量表。尽管结构效度较低,但信度以及同时效度/收敛效度得到了确认。该量表包含用于衡量确保医院EBP持续开展的团体活动的新因素:形成共同知识、理解团体中EBP的价值以及培养对此的主人翁意识。使用该量表,引入EBP的科室可以评估导致护士持续开展EBP的活动程度,并找到改进点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff2e/11919175/c08065c87c1d/JONM2023-8584029.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff2e/11919175/0b27f7b33add/JONM2023-8584029.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff2e/11919175/c08065c87c1d/JONM2023-8584029.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff2e/11919175/0b27f7b33add/JONM2023-8584029.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff2e/11919175/c08065c87c1d/JONM2023-8584029.002.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of a Group Organizational Learning Activity Inventory for the Implementation and Sustainability of Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing.开发用于护理循证实践实施与可持续性的团体组织学习活动量表。
J Nurs Manag. 2023 Aug 21;2023:8584029. doi: 10.1155/2023/8584029. eCollection 2023.
2
Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Implementation Leadership Scale for Nurse Managers and Staff Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study.日本版护士长及护士实施领导力量表的信效度:一项横断面研究
J Nurs Manag. 2023 Oct 23;2023:4080434. doi: 10.1155/2023/4080434. eCollection 2023.
3
EBP Implementation Leadership of Frontline Nurse Managers: Validation of the Implementation Leadership Scale in Acute Care.一线护士长的 EBP 实施领导力:急性护理中实施领导力量表的验证。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2020 Feb;17(1):82-91. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12402. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
4
Translation, cultural adaptation, validation, and reliability study of the Quick-EBP-VIK instrument: Chinese version.快速证据为本实践工具(Quick-EBP-VIK)中文修订版的翻译、文化调适、验证和信度研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Oct;25(5):856-863. doi: 10.1111/jep.13072. Epub 2018 Nov 18.
5
Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Gratitude at Work Scale in Employed Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study.工作感恩量表中文版在在职护士中的心理测量特性:一项横断面研究。
J Nurs Res. 2024 Aug 1;32(4):e336. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000620.
6
Questionnaire to Evaluate the Competency in Evidence-Based Practice of Registered Nurses (EBP-COQ Prof©): Development and Psychometric Validation.评估注册护士循证实践能力的问卷 (EBP-COQ Prof©):开发与心理测量学验证。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2020 Oct;17(5):366-375. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12464. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
7
Adaptation and validation of the evidence-based practice profile (EBP) questionnaire in a Norwegian primary healthcare setting.在挪威的初级医疗保健环境中,对基于证据的实践档案(EBP)问卷进行适应性和验证。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Aug 6;24(1):841. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05842-z.
8
Measuring Nurses' Value, Implementation, and Knowledge of Evidence-Based Practice: Further Psychometric Testing of the Quick-EBP-VIK Survey.衡量护士基于证据的实践的价值、实施情况和知识:快速循证实践价值、实施与知识调查(Quick-EBP-VIK Survey)的进一步心理测量测试
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2017 Feb;14(1):10-21. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12190.
9
Development and Validation of the Dutch EBPAS-ve and EBPQ-ve for Nursing Assistants and Nurses with a Vocational Education.荷兰 EBPAS-ve 和 EBPQ-ve 在具有职业教育的护理助理和护士中的开发与验证。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2019 Oct;16(5):371-380. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12389. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
10
The validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the evidence based practice evaluation competence questionnaire.基于证据的实践评估能力问卷土耳其语版本的效度和信度研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Oct;45:91-5. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.05.030. Epub 2016 Jun 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Organizational transformation elements for evidence-based practice by hospital nursing staff: a qualitative study using 7-S framework.医院护理人员基于证据的实践的组织变革要素:一项使用7-S框架的定性研究
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jun 2;24(1):625. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03271-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Learning from mistakes climate scale: Development and validation.从气候尺度的错误中学习:发展与验证
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 8;13:911311. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.911311. eCollection 2022.
2
Use of Evidence-based Practice Models and Research Findings in Magnet-Designated Hospitals Across the United States: National Survey Results.美国磁性指定医院中基于证据的实践模型和研究结果的使用:全国调查结果。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2020 Apr;17(2):98-107. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12428. Epub 2020 Apr 4.
3
Evidence-based intervention sustainability strategies: a systematic review.
循证干预可持续性策略:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2019 Jun 6;14(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0910-6.
4
Job satisfaction among hospital nurses: A literature review.医院护士工作满意度的文献综述
Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 Jun;94:21-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
5
Context matters in implementation science: a scoping review of determinant frameworks that describe contextual determinants for implementation outcomes.情境在实施科学中很重要:对描述实施结果情境决定因素的决定因素框架的范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Mar 25;19(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4015-3.
6
Implementation Strategies to Improve Evidence-Based Bathing Practices in a Neuro ICU.改善神经重症监护病房循证沐浴实践的实施策略
J Nurs Care Qual. 2019 Apr/Jun;34(2):133-138. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000347.
7
Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer.健康、社会和行为研究量表开发与验证的最佳实践:入门指南。
Front Public Health. 2018 Jun 11;6:149. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149. eCollection 2018.
8
Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity.评价用于估计内容效度的方法。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 Feb;15(2):214-221. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.03.066. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
9
Navigating the sustainability landscape: a systematic review of sustainability approaches in healthcare.探索可持续发展格局:医疗保健可持续性方法的系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2018 Feb 9;13(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0707-4.
10
Evaluating test-retest reliability in patient-reported outcome measures for older people: A systematic review.评估老年人患者报告结局测量工具的重测信度:系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Mar;79:58-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.11.003. Epub 2017 Nov 8.