• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国的视频平台与性健康护理:早泄内容评估

Video platforms and sexual healthcare in China: assessment of content on premature ejaculation.

作者信息

Lu Hao-Yang, Zhang Rong-Hao, Wen Xi, Wang Yi, Wu Ke-Qiu, Li Zhong-Lai, Moon Du Geon, Jiang Wei-Fan

机构信息

Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.

Andrology Laboratory, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Transl Androl Urol. 2025 Mar 30;14(3):729-739. doi: 10.21037/tau-2025-104. Epub 2025 Mar 26.

DOI:10.21037/tau-2025-104
PMID:40226064
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11986497/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Premature ejaculation (PE) is among the most commonly reported types of sexual dysfunction both globally and in China. Despite the growing popularity of online healthcare services and the greater availability of information in mainland China, there is a pressing need to assess the quality and reliability of PE-related content available online and address the potential impact of online misinformation. Thus, in this study, we assessed the quality of information regarding PE videos on the top video websites in China.

METHODS

The top 10 video platforms in mainland China were searched using PE-related keywords for videos published as of July 2023. All available videos were examined for eligibility and reliability, and two reviewers independently evaluated the videos using Global Quality Score (GQS) scores for quality and DISCERN tools for their content reliability. All data were analyzed with SPSS software (IBM Corp.).

RESULTS

Information on sexual medicine content related to PE was found to be available on just seven of the websites examined. From the 1,468 videos initially retrieved, 582 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 319 videos (54.81%) were deemed reliable, while 263 (45.19%) were classified as unreliable. The agreement between the two urologists reviewing the videos and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were deemed acceptable. There were significant differences in the quality, reliability, source, presentation format, and themes of the videos.

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of resources on Chinese video platforms varies widely. Users seeking PE-related information should carefully select the appropriate platforms and opt for higher-quality videos. The existing participation of professional medical personnel was seen as insufficient, and joint efforts are needed to implement content review and the establishment of an evaluation framework.

摘要

背景

早泄(PE)是全球和中国最常报告的性功能障碍类型之一。尽管中国大陆在线医疗服务越来越普及,信息获取也更加便捷,但迫切需要评估网上早泄相关内容的质量和可靠性,并应对网上错误信息的潜在影响。因此,在本研究中,我们评估了中国顶级视频网站上早泄相关视频的信息质量。

方法

使用与早泄相关的关键词在中国大陆排名前十的视频平台上搜索截至2023年7月发布的视频。检查所有可用视频的合格性和可靠性,两名评审员使用全球质量评分(GQS)评估视频质量,使用DISCERN工具评估内容可靠性。所有数据均使用SPSS软件(IBM公司)进行分析。

结果

在所检查的网站中,只有七个网站提供了与早泄相关的性医学内容。从最初检索到的1468个视频中,有582个符合纳入标准。其中,319个视频(54.81%)被认为可靠,263个(45.19%)被归类为不可靠。两位泌尿外科医生对视频的评估一致性和组内相关系数(ICC)被认为是可接受的。视频在质量、可靠性、来源、呈现形式和主题方面存在显著差异。

结论

中国视频平台上的资源质量差异很大。寻求早泄相关信息的用户应仔细选择合适的平台,并选择质量更高的视频。目前专业医务人员的参与度不足,需要共同努力进行内容审核并建立评估框架。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d62/11986497/454fde1d6d6a/tau-14-03-729-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d62/11986497/6538cf70bbe5/tau-14-03-729-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d62/11986497/454fde1d6d6a/tau-14-03-729-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d62/11986497/6538cf70bbe5/tau-14-03-729-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d62/11986497/454fde1d6d6a/tau-14-03-729-f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Video platforms and sexual healthcare in China: assessment of content on premature ejaculation.中国的视频平台与性健康护理:早泄内容评估
Transl Androl Urol. 2025 Mar 30;14(3):729-739. doi: 10.21037/tau-2025-104. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
2
TikTok as a source of information regarding premature ejaculation: a qualitative assessment.抖音作为早泄信息来源的定性评估
Sex Med. 2023 Mar 1;11(2):qfac020. doi: 10.1093/sexmed/qfac020. eCollection 2023 Apr.
3
YouTube as a Source of Information About Premature Ejaculation Treatment.YouTube 作为早泄治疗信息的来源。
J Sex Med. 2019 Nov;16(11):1734-1740. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.08.008. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
4
Quality of cerebral palsy videos on Chinese social media platforms.中国社交媒体平台上脑瘫相关视频的质量
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 17;15(1):13323. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84845-8.
5
The quality and reliability of online video resources concerning patient education for migraine treatment in China Mainland: an electronic media-based study.中国大陆偏头痛治疗患者教育在线视频资源的质量与可靠性:一项基于电子媒体的研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 18;25(1):656. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21861-x.
6
YouTube as a source of education on piriformis injection: a content, quality, and reliability analysis.YouTube作为梨状肌注射教育资源的内容、质量和可靠性分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 16;25(1):549. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07154-2.
7
Quality and Reliability of Liver Cancer-Related Short Chinese Videos on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Content Analysis Study.肝癌相关短视频在 TikTok 和 Bilibili 上的质量与可靠性:一项横断面内容分析研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 5;25:e47210. doi: 10.2196/47210.
8
A Double-Edged Sword: Quality and Credibility of Colon Cancer Screening Content on YouTube.一把双刃剑:YouTube上结肠癌筛查内容的质量与可信度
Cureus. 2024 Feb 26;16(2):e54929. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54929. eCollection 2024 Feb.
9
Youtube is an unreliable source of information about delayed ejaculation treatment.YouTube 是关于早泄治疗的不可靠信息来源。 (注:原文中“delayed ejaculation”有误,实际想表达的可能是“premature ejaculation”早泄,按照正确的医学术语进行了翻译调整)
Urologia. 2024 May;91(2):403-412. doi: 10.1177/03915603231204077. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
10
Assessment of the reliability and quality of breast cancer related videos on TikTok and Bilibili: cross-sectional study in China.TikTok和哔哩哔哩上乳腺癌相关视频的可靠性和质量评估:中国的横断面研究
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 22;11:1296386. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1296386. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing the quality and reliability of YouTube videos as a source of information on inflammatory back pain.评估YouTube视频作为炎性背痛信息来源的质量和可靠性。
PeerJ. 2024 Apr 11;12:e17215. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17215. eCollection 2024.
2
Contents analysis of thyroid cancer-related information uploaded to YouTube by physicians in Korea: endorsing thyroid cancer screening, potentially leading to overdiagnosis.韩国医生在 YouTube 上上传的甲状腺癌相关信息的内容分析:支持甲状腺癌筛查,可能导致过度诊断。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Apr 2;24(1):942. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18403-2.
3
The new checklist to evaluate educational value of YouTube surgical videos of transurethral resection of the prostate.
评估YouTube上经尿道前列腺切除术手术视频教育价值的新清单。
Transl Androl Urol. 2023 Dec 31;12(12):1827-1833. doi: 10.21037/tau-23-394. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
4
The quality of YouTube videos on radiotherapy and prostatectomy for prostate cancer.关于前列腺癌放疗和前列腺切除术的YouTube视频质量。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2024 Feb;18(2):61-66. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8523.
5
Regular penis-root masturbation: A promising behavioral treatment method for lifelong premature ejaculation.规律阴茎根部自慰:一种有前途的治疗终身早泄的行为方法。
Prog Urol. 2023 Dec;33(15-16):1008-1013. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2023.09.010. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
6
Comparison of the results of stop-start technique with stop-start technique and sphincter control training applied in premature ejaculation treatment.比较停止-开始技术与停止-开始技术联合括约肌控制训练治疗早泄的效果。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 10;18(8):e0283091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283091. eCollection 2023.
7
Quality and benefits of the erectile dysfunction information on websites, social-media, and applications.网站、社交媒体和应用程序上的勃起功能障碍信息的质量和益处。
Int J Impot Res. 2024 Nov;36(7):688-692. doi: 10.1038/s41443-023-00725-1. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
8
From Waterloo to the Great Wall: A retrospective, multicenter study on the clinical practice and cultural attitudes in the management of premature ejaculation, in China.从滑铁卢到长城:中国关于早泄管理的临床实践和文化态度的回顾性、多中心研究。
Andrology. 2024 Feb;12(2):247-258. doi: 10.1111/andr.13403. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
9
Longitudinal analysis of YouTube videos discussing post-prostatectomy erectile dysfunction.对讨论前列腺癌根治术后勃起功能障碍的 YouTube 视频进行纵向分析。
Urol Oncol. 2023 Apr;41(4):205.e11-205.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.12.010. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
10
YouTube™ as a source of information on prostatitis: a quality and reliability analysis.YouTube™作为前列腺炎信息来源的质量与可靠性分析
Int J Impot Res. 2024 May;36(3):242-247. doi: 10.1038/s41443-023-00666-9. Epub 2023 Jan 16.