Anderson Hannah Kakara, Cabral Pricilla, Gerstenzang Emma, Liverpool Christine, Gonzalez Marciel, Weiss Anna, Cullen Danielle, Balmer Dorene, Govaerts Marjan, West Daniel C, Busari Jamiu
University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, US.
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, US.
Perspect Med Educ. 2025 Apr 7;14(1):141-148. doi: 10.5334/pme.1541. eCollection 2025.
There is a large body of evidence that assessment systems in medical education are inequitable for many groups of learners. A common approach to improve equity has been the use of organizational strategies, where training program leaders work to develop and implement improvements in existing assessment systems from their perspective to improve equity. However, emerging assessment approaches, such as justice-oriented assessment, argue that assessment systems must be made more equitable by critique and re-building through co-design with learners, assessors, and other key users. Little is known about how to apply these methods to workplace-based assessment in medical education.
To fill the knowledge gap about how to co-design a more equitable, justice-oriented, workplace-based assessment system in pediatric post-graduate medical education.
Using the Design Justice framework, the authors completed 4 of the 5 phases of Design Thinking to co-design with learners and other users a workplace-based assessment system in their institution's pediatric residency program.
To understand whether and how Design Justice principles were present and operationalized in the process of co-designing the assessment system, the authors evaluated the design activities in each phase of the Design Thinking process, the outputs of the design process, and the experiences of participating users.
Evidence of Design Justice principles included participants' feelings of being heard, affirmed, and empowered, as well as the design teams' iterative, critical reflection on making the project accessible, accountable, sustainable, and collaborative. This project offers a practical example of co-designing a justice-oriented assessment system, the process and principles of which can inform the efforts of advancing equity in assessment.
有大量证据表明,医学教育中的评估系统对许多学习者群体而言是不公平的。一种常见的改善公平性的方法是采用组织策略,即培训项目负责人从自身角度努力改进和实施现有评估系统以提高公平性。然而,诸如以公正为导向的评估等新兴评估方法认为,必须通过与学习者、评估者及其他关键用户共同设计进行批判和重建,使评估系统更加公平。对于如何将这些方法应用于医学教育中的基于工作场所的评估,人们知之甚少。
填补关于如何在儿科毕业后医学教育中共同设计一个更公平、以公正为导向、基于工作场所的评估系统的知识空白。
作者运用设计公正框架,完成了设计思维五个阶段中的四个阶段,以便与学习者及其他用户共同设计所在机构儿科住院医师培训项目中的基于工作场所的评估系统。
为了解在共同设计评估系统的过程中设计公正原则是否存在以及如何实施,作者评估了设计思维过程各阶段的设计活动、设计过程的产出以及参与用户的体验。
设计公正原则的证据包括参与者感到自己的意见被听取、得到肯定并获得授权,以及设计团队对使项目具有可及性、可问责性、可持续性和协作性进行的迭代式批判性反思。该项目提供了一个共同设计以公正为导向的评估系统的实际范例,其过程和原则可为推进评估公平性的工作提供参考。