Suppr超能文献

基于肠促胰岛素的药物与不同体重指数类别2型糖尿病患者胆囊或胆道疾病风险:一项全国性队列研究

Incretin-based drugs and the risk of gallbladder or biliary tract diseases among patients with type 2 diabetes across categories of body mass index: a nationwide cohort study.

作者信息

Ko Hwa Yeon, Bea Sungho, Yoon Dongwon, Hong Bin, Bae Jae Hyun, Cho Young Min, Shin Ju-Young

机构信息

School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon-si, South Korea.

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2025 Mar 10;56:101242. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101242. eCollection 2025 Mar.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite emerging evidence of gallbladder or biliary tract diseases (GBD) risk regarding incretin-based drugs, population-specific safety profile considering obesity is lacking. We aimed to assess whether stratification by body mass index (BMI) modifies the measures of association between incretin-based drugs and the risk of GBD.

METHODS

We conducted an active-comparator, new-user cohort study using a nationwide claims data (2013-2022) of Korea. We included type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients stratified by Asian BMI categories: Normal, 18.5 to <23 kg/m; Overweight, 23 to <25 kg/m; Obese, ≥25 kg/m. The primary outcome was a composite of GBD, including cholelithiasis, cholecystitis, obstruction of the gallbladder or bile duct, cholangitis, and cholecystectomy. We used 1:1 propensity score (PS) matching and estimated hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using Cox models.

FINDINGS

New users of DPP4i and SGLT2i were 1:1 PS matched (n = 251,420 pairs; 186,697 obese, 39,974 overweight, and 24,749 normal weight pairs). The overall HR for the risk of GBD with DPP4i vs. SGLT2i was 1.21 (95% CI 1.14-1.28), with no effect modification by BMI (p-value: 0.83). For the second cohort, new users of GLP1RA and SGLT2i were 1:1 PS matched (n = 45,443 pairs; 28,011 obese, 8948 overweight, and 8484 normal weight pairs). The overall HR for the risk of GBD with GLP1RA vs. SGLT2i was 1.27 (1.07-1.50), with no effect modification by BMI (p-value: 0.73).

INTERPRETATION

The increased risks of GBD were presented in both cohorts with no evidence of effect heterogeneity by BMI.

FUNDING

Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Health Fellowship Foundation.

摘要

背景

尽管有新证据表明基于肠促胰岛素的药物存在胆囊或胆道疾病(GBD)风险,但缺乏考虑肥胖因素的特定人群安全性概况。我们旨在评估按体重指数(BMI)分层是否会改变基于肠促胰岛素的药物与GBD风险之间的关联度量。

方法

我们使用韩国全国范围的索赔数据(2013 - 2022年)进行了一项活性对照、新使用者队列研究。我们纳入了按亚洲BMI类别分层的2型糖尿病(T2D)患者:正常,18.5至<23kg/m²;超重,23至<25kg/m²;肥胖,≥25kg/m²。主要结局是GBD的复合结局,包括胆结石、胆囊炎、胆囊或胆管梗阻、胆管炎和胆囊切除术。我们使用1:1倾向评分(PS)匹配,并使用Cox模型估计风险比(HR)及95%置信区间(CI)。

研究结果

DPP4i和SGLT2i的新使用者进行了1:1 PS匹配(n = 251,420对;186,697对肥胖、39,974对超重和24,749对正常体重)。DPP4i与SGLT2i相比,GBD风险的总体HR为1.21(95% CI 1.14 - 1.28),BMI无效应修饰(p值:0.83)。对于第二个队列,GLP1RA和SGLT2i的新使用者进行了1:1 PS匹配(n = 45,443对;28,011对肥胖、8,948对超重和8,484对正常体重)。GLP1RA与SGLT2i相比,GBD风险的总体HR为1.27(1.07 - 1.50),BMI无效应修饰(p值:0.73)。

解读

两个队列均显示GBD风险增加,且无BMI效应异质性的证据。

资助

食品药品安全部、健康奖学金基金会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8038/11992583/2a6142fc5c8f/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验