Tsatsaronis Chrissa, Klemt Maria, Kinder Karen, Langenberger Benedikt, Braun Anna, Grobe Thomas G, Busse Reinhard, Quentin Wilm
Fachgebiet Management im Gesundheitswesen, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Abteilung Gesundheitsberichterstattung und Biometrie, aQua - Institut für angewandte Qualitätsförderung und Forschung im Gesundheitswesen, Göttingen, Germany.
Gesundheitswesen. 2025 Apr;87(4):282-290. doi: 10.1055/a-2541-9695. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
In recent years there has been an increased demand for a morbidity-oriented approach in the planning of healthcare facilities in Germany. Population-based classification systems, which already exist in various countries, are crucial for assessing regional healthcare needs. The PopGroup project aims to develop such a classification system (PopGrouper) for the German healthcare system and to test various applications. The PopGrouper assigns each individual to exactly one PopGroup based on clinical characteristics and healthcare needs. The initial phase of the PopGrouper development focused on grouping diagnoses into medically meaningful Consolidated Disease Groups (CDGs) to serve as the foundation for forming PopGroups. This article describes the formation and validation of CDGs, as well as the definition of a disease severity level to hierarchically rank the CDGs.
CDGs were formed using both medical expertise and analyses of claims data from the BARMER sickness fund. Pre-existing diagnosis groups (DxGs) defined for the German morbidity-based risk structure compensation scheme were used as the starting point. Initially, overarching Major Disease Categories (MDCs) were formed. Within MDCs, DxGs were grouped into CDGs based on predefined criteria. CDGs were validated by experts from scientific medical societies. Finally, a composite disease severity score was calculated based on three dimensions (mortality, costs, utilization) and severity levels from "very severe" to "very minor" were defined to classify CDGs.
A total of 32 MDCs and 433 CDGs were defined and validated. Each CDG received a severity score. Based on this foundation, in the subsequent project phase, PopGroups were formed that took into consideration various diseases and combinations of diseases.
CDGs and MDCs represent important initial steps in the PopGrouper development. The aggregation of diagnoses into a smaller number of medically meaningful groups also offers opportunities beyond the project, for instance for healthcare research, for the analysis of diseases, and for the identification of patient groups with similar characteristics.
近年来,德国对以发病率为导向的医疗设施规划方法的需求不断增加。各国现有的基于人群的分类系统对于评估地区医疗需求至关重要。PopGroup项目旨在为德国医疗系统开发这样一种分类系统(PopGrouper)并测试各种应用。PopGrouper根据临床特征和医疗需求将每个人精确地分配到一个PopGroup中。PopGrouper开发的初始阶段专注于将诊断分组为具有医学意义的综合疾病组(CDG),作为形成PopGroup的基础。本文描述了CDG的形成与验证,以及用于对CDG进行分层排序的疾病严重程度级别的定义。
利用医学专业知识和来自BARMER疾病基金的理赔数据分析来形成CDG。为德国基于发病率的风险结构补偿计划定义的现有诊断组(DxG)用作起点。最初,形成总体主要疾病类别(MDC)。在MDC内,根据预定义标准将DxG分组为CDG。CDG由科学医学协会的专家进行验证。最后,基于三个维度(死亡率、成本、利用率)计算综合疾病严重程度评分,并定义从“非常严重”到“非常轻微”的严重程度级别以对CDG进行分类。
总共定义并验证了32个MDC和433个CDG。每个CDG都获得了一个严重程度评分。在此基础上,在后续项目阶段,形成了考虑各种疾病及疾病组合的PopGroup。
CDG和MDC是PopGrouper开发中的重要初始步骤。将诊断汇总为数量较少的具有医学意义的组,在项目之外也提供了机会,例如用于医疗研究、疾病分析以及识别具有相似特征的患者群体。