• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

XGBoost与逻辑回归用于预测胃癌术后患者肌肉减少症的比较研究

Comparative study of XGBoost and logistic regression for predicting sarcopenia in postsurgical gastric cancer patients.

作者信息

Gu Yajing, Su Shu, Wang Xianping, Mao Juanjuan, Ni Xuan, Li Ai, Liang Yueli, Zeng Xing

机构信息

Department of Urology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Wound ostomy clinic, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 14;15(1):12808. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98075-z.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-98075-z
PMID:40229548
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11997166/
Abstract

The use of machine learning (ML) techniques, particularly XGBoost and logistic regression, to predict sarcopenia among postsurgical gastric cancer patients has gained significant attention in recent research. Sarcopenia, characterized by the progressive loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength, is a serious concern in these patients due to its association with poor postoperative outcomes, including increased morbidity and mortality. In this study, machine learning was used to establish a risk prediction model for sarcopenia in patients with gastric cancer undergoing gastrectomy to facilitate early intervention and reduce the incidence of postoperative complications. Gastric cancer patients who underwent surgery at a tertiary comprehensive hospital in Nanjing (China) from January 2022 to December 2023 were retrospectively included in this study, and their clinical and follow-up data were collected. The XGBoost model and multivariate logistic regression analysis model were used to screen the factors related to postoperative outcomes, and the results of the two models were compared. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity were calculated to evaluate the predictive value of the XGBoost model. The SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) method was used to explain the XGBoost model and determine the impact of features on the prediction model. A total of 231 postoperative gastric cancer patients were included in this study, of whom 128 (55.4%) developed sarcopenia. The results of the univariate analysis and LASSO (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator) regression were cross-validated, and 5 key study variables were ultimately determined: serum albumin, comorbid diabetes, operation style, nutritional score, and ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status score. The XGBoost model has slightly better AUC (0.987, 95% CI: 0.976-0.998) than the logistic regression model (0.918, 95% CI: 0.873-0.963) in the training set. The SHAP analysis showed that in the XGBoost model, diabetes, nutritional score, and serum albumin have a greater impact on the sarcopenia risk prediction after gastric cancer surgery, especially the impact of diabetes and nutritional score is the most significant, followed by the ECOG performance status score, and operation style has the least impact. In summary, the machine learning-based sarcopenia prediction model constructed in this study provides a valuable decision support tool for clinical screening and intervention of sarcopenia.

摘要

近年来,利用机器学习(ML)技术,尤其是XGBoost和逻辑回归,来预测胃癌术后患者的肌肉减少症受到了广泛关注。肌肉减少症的特征是骨骼肌质量和力量的逐渐丧失,由于其与术后不良结局相关,包括发病率和死亡率增加,因此在这些患者中是一个严重问题。在本研究中,利用机器学习为接受胃切除术的胃癌患者建立了肌肉减少症风险预测模型,以促进早期干预并降低术后并发症的发生率。回顾性纳入了2022年1月至2023年12月在中国南京一家三级综合医院接受手术的胃癌患者,并收集了他们的临床和随访数据。使用XGBoost模型和多因素逻辑回归分析模型筛选与术后结局相关的因素,并比较两个模型的结果。计算受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)、敏感性和特异性,以评估XGBoost模型的预测价值。使用SHAP(SHapley Additive exPlanations)方法解释XGBoost模型并确定特征对预测模型的影响。本研究共纳入231例胃癌术后患者,其中128例(55.4%)发生了肌肉减少症。对单因素分析和LASSO(Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator)回归的结果进行交叉验证,最终确定了5个关键研究变量:血清白蛋白、合并糖尿病、手术方式、营养评分和东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态评分。在训练集中,XGBoost模型的AUC(0.987,95%CI:0.976-0.998)略优于逻辑回归模型(0.918,95%CI:0.873-0.963)。SHAP分析表明,在XGBoost模型中,糖尿病、营养评分和血清白蛋白对胃癌术后肌肉减少症风险预测的影响较大,尤其是糖尿病和营养评分的影响最为显著,其次是ECOG体能状态评分,手术方式的影响最小。总之,本研究构建的基于机器学习的肌肉减少症预测模型为临床筛查和干预肌肉减少症提供了有价值的决策支持工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55e6/11997166/4391f1b33855/41598_2025_98075_Figk_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55e6/11997166/f2bfefadf41d/41598_2025_98075_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55e6/11997166/10dfb4a8d64b/41598_2025_98075_Figb_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55e6/11997166/ce3330fd1881/41598_2025_98075_Figc_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55e6/11997166/4539ed8ef098/41598_2025_98075_Figd_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55e6/11997166/089aff4fed23/41598_2025_98075_Fige_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55e6/11997166/3659839f2761/41598_2025_98075_Figf_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55e6/11997166/35cd9c10b3b7/41598_2025_98075_Figg_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55e6/11997166/59d7e69ebaef/41598_2025_98075_Figh_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55e6/11997166/915fdb58493c/41598_2025_98075_Figi_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55e6/11997166/f2a573fba0ac/41598_2025_98075_Figj_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55e6/11997166/4391f1b33855/41598_2025_98075_Figk_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55e6/11997166/f2bfefadf41d/41598_2025_98075_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55e6/11997166/10dfb4a8d64b/41598_2025_98075_Figb_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55e6/11997166/ce3330fd1881/41598_2025_98075_Figc_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55e6/11997166/4539ed8ef098/41598_2025_98075_Figd_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55e6/11997166/089aff4fed23/41598_2025_98075_Fige_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55e6/11997166/3659839f2761/41598_2025_98075_Figf_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55e6/11997166/35cd9c10b3b7/41598_2025_98075_Figg_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55e6/11997166/59d7e69ebaef/41598_2025_98075_Figh_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55e6/11997166/915fdb58493c/41598_2025_98075_Figi_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55e6/11997166/f2a573fba0ac/41598_2025_98075_Figj_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55e6/11997166/4391f1b33855/41598_2025_98075_Figk_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative study of XGBoost and logistic regression for predicting sarcopenia in postsurgical gastric cancer patients.XGBoost与逻辑回归用于预测胃癌术后患者肌肉减少症的比较研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 14;15(1):12808. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98075-z.
2
Predictive modeling of lower extreme deep vein thrombosis following radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: based on multiple machine learning methods.基于多种机器学习方法的胃癌根治术后下肢深静脉血栓形成的预测模型。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 8;14(1):15711. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66754-y.
3
[Comparison of machine learning and Logistic regression model in predicting acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery: data analysis based on MIMIC-III database].[机器学习与逻辑回归模型在预测心脏手术后急性肾损伤中的比较:基于MIMIC-III数据库的数据分析]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2022 Nov;34(11):1188-1193. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20210223-00279.
4
Application of machine learning model in predicting the likelihood of blood transfusion after hip fracture surgery.机器学习模型在预测髋部骨折手术后输血可能性中的应用。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023 Nov;35(11):2643-2656. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02550-4. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
5
Machine learning assisted radiomics in predicting postoperative occurrence of deep venous thrombosis in patients with gastric cancer.机器学习辅助的放射组学在预测胃癌患者术后深静脉血栓形成中的应用
BMC Cancer. 2025 Feb 7;25(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13630-1.
6
An explainable machine learning-based prediction model for sarcopenia in elderly Chinese people with knee osteoarthritis.一种基于可解释机器学习的中国老年膝骨关节炎患者肌肉减少症预测模型。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2025 Mar 7;37(1):67. doi: 10.1007/s40520-025-02931-x.
7
Sarcopenia defined by the global leadership initiative in sarcopenia (GLIS) consensus predicts adverse postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: analysis from a prospective cohort study.由全球肌少症领导倡议(GLIS)共识定义的肌少症可预测接受胃癌根治性胃切除术患者的不良术后结局:一项前瞻性队列研究的分析
BMC Cancer. 2025 Apr 14;25(1):679. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13967-7.
8
Interpretable machine learning model for predicting post-hepatectomy liver failure in hepatocellular carcinoma.用于预测肝细胞癌肝切除术后肝衰竭的可解释机器学习模型
Sci Rep. 2025 May 3;15(1):15469. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97878-4.
9
Prediction of STAS in lung adenocarcinoma with nodules ≤ 2 cm using machine learning: a multicenter retrospective study.使用机器学习预测直径≤2 cm的肺腺癌中的STAS:一项多中心回顾性研究
BMC Cancer. 2025 Mar 7;25(1):417. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13783-z.
10
Explainable machine learning model for predicting the occurrence of postoperative malnutrition in children with congenital heart disease.用于预测先天性心脏病儿童术后发生营养不良的可解释机器学习模型。
Clin Nutr. 2022 Jan;41(1):202-210. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.11.006. Epub 2021 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Muscle-Driven prognostication in gastric cancer: A multicenter deep learning framework integrating Iliopsoas and erector spinae radiomics for 5-Year survival prediction.肌肉驱动的胃癌预后评估:一个整合髂腰肌和竖脊肌影像组学的多中心深度学习框架用于5年生存预测。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):22347. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09083-y.
2
Methodological Review of Classification Trees for Risk Stratification: An Application Example in the Obesity Paradox.风险分层分类树的方法学综述:肥胖悖论中的一个应用实例
Nutrients. 2025 May 31;17(11):1903. doi: 10.3390/nu17111903.
3
Towards Precision in Sarcopenia Assessment: The Challenges of Multimodal Data Analysis in the Era of AI.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and validation of nomograms for predicting the prognosis of early and late recurrence of advanced gastric cancer after radical surgery based on post-recurrence survival.基于复发后生存情况,建立并验证用于预测根治术后晚期及早期复发的进展期胃癌患者预后的列线图。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 May 31;103(22):e38376. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038376.
2
Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.2022 年全球癌症统计数据:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率全球估计数。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 May-Jun;74(3):229-263. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
3
迈向肌肉减少症评估的精准化:人工智能时代多模态数据分析的挑战
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 May 7;26(9):4428. doi: 10.3390/ijms26094428.
Changes in Cells Associated with Insulin Resistance.
与胰岛素抵抗相关的细胞变化。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Feb 18;25(4):2397. doi: 10.3390/ijms25042397.
4
Association between preoperative sarcopenia and prognosis of pancreatic cancer after curative-intent surgery: a updated systematic review and meta-analysis.术前骨骼肌减少症与根治性手术后胰腺癌预后的关系:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Jan 30;22(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03310-y.
5
Defining nomograms for predicting prognosis of early and late recurrence in gastric cancer patients after radical gastrectomy.建立用于预测胃癌患者根治性胃切除术后早期和晚期复发预后的列线图。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Oct 20;102(42):e35585. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035585.
6
The effect of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity on survival in gastric cancer.肌肉减少症和肌少症性肥胖对胃癌患者生存的影响。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Sep 28;23(1):911. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11423-y.
7
Robotic Esophagectomy Compared With Open Esophagectomy Reduces Sarcopenia within the First Postoperative Year: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.机器人食管癌切除术与开放食管癌切除术相比可减少术后第一年内的肌肉减少症:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
J Thorac Oncol. 2023 Feb;18(2):232-244. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2022.10.018. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
8
Effects of Sarcopenia on Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Who Underwent Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.肌肉减少症对胃癌胃切除术后患者术后结局的影响。
J Surg Res. 2022 Jun;274:196-206. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.12.051. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
9
Impact of preoperative sarcopenia on postoperative complications and prognosis of gastric cancer resection: A meta-analysis of cohort studies.术前肌少症对胃癌切除术术后并发症和预后的影响:队列研究的荟萃分析。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2022 Jan-Feb;98:104534. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2021.104534. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
10
Sarcopenia, muscle quality, and gastric cancer surgery.肌肉减少症、肌肉质量与胃癌手术
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2021 Jul 12;5(4):402-403. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12485. eCollection 2021 Jul.