Betteto Luca, De Tommaso Matteo, Turatto Massimo
Cimec, Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Corso Bettini, 31, 38068, Rovereto, Italy.
Department of Psychology, University of Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 May;87(4):1083-1097. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03069-8. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
Theories of visual distraction handling commonly propose that mechanisms of distractor rejection are engaged because irrelevant, salient objects tend to dominate the attentional competition with the target. Consequently, the resulting misallocation of attention is thought to trigger distractor suppression, ultimately reducing unwanted attentional capture. Using a modified version of the classic additional-singleton paradigm based on four consecutive displays in each trial, where the target and the distractor competed for attention only in the last one, we demonstrated that the attentional capture elicited by a color singleton was strongly attenuated when the singleton repeatedly appeared within the same trial, even in the absence of a competing target. Importantly, this capture attenuation was not associated with target impairment when the target appeared at the singleton location, suggesting that the within-trial rejection was likely controlled by an expectation-based mechanism rather than a suppressive one. Our findings point to the existence of distinct within-trial and across-trials rejection mechanisms, potentially operating on different timescales and involving suppressive and nonsuppressive processes.
视觉干扰处理理论通常认为,由于无关的显著物体往往在与目标的注意力竞争中占据主导地位,所以会启用干扰物排除机制。因此,由此产生的注意力分配不当被认为会引发干扰物抑制,最终减少不必要的注意力捕获。我们使用了经典附加单一物范式的修改版本,每个试验中有四个连续的显示,其中目标和干扰物仅在最后一个显示中竞争注意力,结果表明,即使在没有竞争目标的情况下,当单一物在同一试验中反复出现时,由颜色单一物引发的注意力捕获也会大大减弱。重要的是,当目标出现在单一物位置时,这种捕获减弱与目标受损无关,这表明试验内的排除可能是由基于预期的机制而非抑制性机制控制的。我们的研究结果表明存在不同的试验内和跨试验排除机制,它们可能在不同的时间尺度上运作,涉及抑制性和非抑制性过程。