Nopour Raoof
Department of Health Information Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 14;25(1):541. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12731-8.
Identifying barriers and facilitators of tele-oncology adoption is essential in enhancing healthcare stakeholders' decision-making on its leverage. This study aims to review the existing literature on barriers and facilitators to understand this topic better.
This scoping review was conducted based on the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The Web of Sciences, PubMed, and Scopus scientific databases were investigated to obtain articles. The data on barriers and facilitators were extracted from the included articles and finalized through the joint meeting. The aggregated barriers and facilitators were synthesized and categorized into themes using qualitative content analysis. This method categorized thematically similar barriers and facilitators into similar themes. We also used the descriptive statistics method of data (frequency and percentage), depicted data in table and figure formats, and synthesized the data narratively to show the findings on the included studies' characteristics.
Twelve articles from 685 records retrieved from the databases were employed in this study on this topic. Forty-eight barriers and 92 facilitators of tele-oncology use were obtained, including personal, technical, data management, managerial, and legal factors. The most critical barriers and facilitators were regarding the lack of technical requirements and usability characteristics of technologies in cancer care, respectively.
Considering the barriers and facilitators of using tele-oncology in cancer care through analyzing the existing studies can have a key role in optimizing the decision-making of various healthcare stakeholders, including policymakers, managers, and others involved in enhancing the patient care process. It can also be crucial in increasing the chances of technology acceptance in healthcare.
识别远程肿瘤学应用的障碍和促进因素对于增强医疗保健利益相关者在利用该技术方面的决策至关重要。本研究旨在回顾现有关于障碍和促进因素的文献,以更好地理解这一主题。
本范围综述基于范围综述的PRISMA扩展版(PRISMA-ScR)进行。对科学网、PubMed和Scopus科学数据库进行了检索以获取文章。从纳入的文章中提取有关障碍和促进因素的数据,并通过联席会议最终确定。使用定性内容分析将汇总的障碍和促进因素进行综合并归类为主题。该方法将主题相似的障碍和促进因素归为相似主题。我们还使用了数据的描述性统计方法(频率和百分比),以表格和图表形式呈现数据,并对数据进行叙述性综合,以展示纳入研究的特征方面的结果。
本研究在该主题上使用了从数据库检索到的685条记录中的12篇文章。获得了48个远程肿瘤学使用的障碍和92个促进因素,包括个人、技术、数据管理、管理和法律因素。最关键的障碍和促进因素分别是癌症护理中技术缺乏技术要求和可用性特征。
通过分析现有研究来考虑癌症护理中使用远程肿瘤学的障碍和促进因素,对于优化包括政策制定者、管理者和其他参与改善患者护理过程的人员在内的各种医疗保健利益相关者的决策可能具有关键作用。这对于增加医疗保健中技术接受的机会也可能至关重要。