Markoe A M, Brady L W, Shields J A, Augsburger J J, Micaily B, Damsker J I, Day J L, Gamel J W
Radiology. 1985 Sep;156(3):801-3. doi: 10.1148/radiology.156.3.4023247.
Survival rates and visual acuity of 100 patients treated for posterior uveal malignant melanoma by cobalt-60 plaque radiotherapy were compared with 150 patients treated by enucleation for the same disease. Life-table comparisons of the entire group showed significant differences in survival rates, with plaque radiotherapy patients appearing to fare better. However, when patients with small or medium tumors were compared, only slight differences were seen, implying that criteria used to select patients for treatment may affect interpretation. The two groups were also compared using the Cox proportional hazards model, which predicts survival based on the impact of clinical variables. In this analysis, the survival rates of the plaque radiotherapy group were no worse than those of the enucleation group. The advantage of conservative therapy lies in the potential to preserve useful vision over a considerable time. Because patients were specifically selected for treatment modality and because the study size used to calibrate the Cox model was small, the results of this study must be interpreted with caution.
将接受钴-60敷贴放射治疗的100例后葡萄膜恶性黑色素瘤患者的生存率和视力,与因同一疾病接受眼球摘除术治疗的150例患者进行了比较。对整个组的生命表比较显示生存率存在显著差异,敷贴放射治疗的患者似乎预后更好。然而,当比较小或中等肿瘤的患者时,仅观察到轻微差异,这意味着用于选择治疗患者的标准可能会影响解释。还使用Cox比例风险模型对两组进行了比较,该模型基于临床变量的影响预测生存率。在此分析中,敷贴放射治疗组的生存率并不比眼球摘除术组差。保守治疗的优势在于有可能在相当长的时间内保留有用的视力。由于患者是根据治疗方式专门挑选的,并且由于用于校准Cox模型的研究规模较小,因此本研究的结果必须谨慎解释。