Suppr超能文献

对所有人来说,适宜步行是否有益健康?利用国家环境数据库审视美国适宜行人社区环境卫生特征的公平性

Is walkability healthy for all? Using the National Environmental Database to examine equity in the environmental health characteristics of pedestrian-supportive neighborhoods in the U.S.

作者信息

Braun Lindsay M, Fox Eric H, Frank Lawrence D

机构信息

Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 611 E. Lorado Taft Dr., Champaign, IL, 61820, USA.

Urban Design 4 Health, Inc., 353 Rockingham St., Rochester, NY, 14620, USA.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2025 Jun;374:118024. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118024. Epub 2025 Apr 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Marginalized populations in the U.S. often live in dense urban areas, which could promote active travel and health. However, while compactness can support walkability, it can also create exposure to pollution, noise, injury risk, and urban heat islands. These exposures may be higher for marginalized groups, creating systematic "walkability-related" risks.

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated relationships between walkability, health-related environmental exposures, and social vulnerability, asking: (1) How are sociodemographic groups sorted across space with respect to walkability? (2) Do the environmental health correlates of walkability vary by social vulnerability?

METHODS

We compiled block group-level data for the 30 largest U.S. metropolitan areas. We measured walkability using the National Walkability Index; social vulnerability using indicators of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status; and environmental exposures using PM, pedestrian fatalities, noise, and tree coverage. We used multilevel mixed-effects regressions to predict (1) walkability as a function of vulnerability and (2) each environmental exposure as a function of the cross-tabulation between walkability and vulnerability.

RESULTS

Higher walkability was associated with higher vulnerability. Compared to highly walkable block groups with low vulnerability, those with high vulnerability had higher PM and noise levels and lower tree coverage. These differences were even more pronounced among block groups with low walkability, suggesting pervasive inequities.

DISCUSSION

While marginalized groups often live in more walkable places, the "high" walkability to which they are exposed carries greater environmental risks than for privileged populations. Our findings illustrate the importance of mitigating environmental burdens that could dampen the health benefits of walkability in marginalized communities.

摘要

背景

美国的边缘化人群通常居住在人口密集的城市地区,这可能会促进积极出行和健康。然而,尽管城市紧凑性有助于步行便利性,但也可能导致接触污染、噪音、受伤风险和城市热岛效应。对于边缘化群体来说,这些接触可能更多,从而产生系统性的“与步行便利性相关”的风险。

目的

我们评估了步行便利性、与健康相关的环境暴露和社会脆弱性之间的关系,具体问题如下:(1)社会人口群体在步行便利性方面如何在空间上分布?(2)步行便利性与环境健康的关联是否因社会脆弱性而异?

方法

我们汇总了美国30个最大都市区的街区组层面的数据。我们使用国家步行便利性指数来衡量步行便利性;使用种族/族裔和社会经济地位指标来衡量社会脆弱性;使用颗粒物、行人死亡率、噪音和树木覆盖率来衡量环境暴露。我们使用多层混合效应回归来预测:(1)步行便利性作为脆弱性的函数;(2)每种环境暴露作为步行便利性和脆弱性交叉列表的函数。

结果

较高的步行便利性与较高的脆弱性相关。与低脆弱性的高步行便利性街区组相比,高脆弱性的街区组有更高的颗粒物和噪音水平以及更低的树木覆盖率。这些差异在步行便利性低的街区组中更为明显,表明存在普遍的不平等。

讨论

虽然边缘化群体通常生活在步行更便利的地方,但他们所接触到的“高”步行便利性所带来的环境风险比特权群体更大。我们的研究结果说明了减轻环境负担的重要性,这些负担可能会削弱边缘化社区中步行便利性对健康的益处。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验