Fausto-Sterling Anne
Departments of Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Biochemistry and Gender and Sexuality Studies, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Am J Hum Biol. 2025 Apr;37(4):e70044. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.70044.
Until quite recently, investigations of gender/sex development operated from a baseline assumption that gender/sex is dichotomous or binary. Most such studies constructed gender/sex outside of or adjacent to specific cultures, and for the most part studied children from Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic (WEIRD) countries. In this paper I first advocate for four research guidelines-inclusivity, epistemic justice, materiality, and empiricism. I sketch out the historical background that still shapes contemporary studies into the psychology of gender/sex identity in infants and toddlers. Next, I point toward methods for the study of gender/sex in infants and toddlers that have the potential to make nonbinary development visible and to develop culturally diverse concepts of identity development. Finally, I challenge psychologists and others to view and operationalize the study of identity as a relational, phenomenological entity rather than a fixed feature of the individual psyche.
直到最近,对性别发展的研究都基于一个基本假设,即性别是二分的或二元的。大多数此类研究在特定文化之外或与之相邻构建性别,并且在很大程度上研究来自西方、受过教育、工业化、富裕、民主(WEIRD)国家的儿童。在本文中,我首先倡导四条研究准则——包容性、认知公正、物质性和经验主义。我勾勒出仍在塑造当代婴幼儿性别/性身份心理学研究的历史背景。接下来,我指出研究婴幼儿性别/性别的方法,这些方法有可能使非二元发展显现出来,并形成文化多元的身份发展概念。最后,我向心理学家和其他人提出挑战,要将身份研究视为一种关系性的、现象学的实体,而不是个体心理的固定特征来看待和操作。