• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为长期新冠认知筛查工具的A-B神经心理学评估量表分析

Analysis of the A-B Neuropsychological Assessment Schedule as a Cognitive Screener for Long COVID.

作者信息

Radhakrishna Kishen, Holland Jessica, O'Keeffe Fiadhnait, Gaynor Keith, Kinsella Justin, Bramham Jessica

机构信息

Neurology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, IRL.

Neuropsychology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, IRL.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Apr 15;17(4):e82311. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82311. eCollection 2025 Apr.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.82311
PMID:40235692
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11999384/
Abstract

Aim To determine the sensitivity and specificity of the psychometric measures of the A-B Neuropsychological Assessment Schedule (ABNAS) to aid screening of long COVID (LC). Methods The participants (N=235) were recruited from an online study of cognitive and psychological consequences of LC, involving individuals attending an LC service in an acute tertiary university hospital and a comparison sample of community controls.The ABNAS for LC, a patient-perceived assessment scale in relation to the challenges they had encountered from LC, was used to identify the specific psychometric measures implicated in LC. Results The optimal cut-off value for total ABNAS scores and its psychometric subsets were obtained from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The sensitivity of the total ABNAS score of ≥21.5 was 81.6% for LC, taken as a post-COVID functional status (PCFS)grade of ≥ 2 as true positives, with a specificity = 72.3%. The specificity of the ABNAS fatigue subscale score of ≥ 8.5 for LC was 87.2%, while its sensitivity was 66.7%. The sensitivity of the ABNAS mental slowing subscale score of ≥ 4.5 was 82.8%, and the specificity was 70.3%. Conclusion Total ABNAS scores and their psychometric subsets (fatigue and mental slowing) are sensitive and specific for LC.

摘要

目的

确定A - B神经心理学评估量表(ABNAS)心理测量指标对辅助筛查长期新冠(LC)的敏感性和特异性。方法:参与者(N = 235)来自一项关于LC认知和心理后果的在线研究,包括在一家急性三级大学医院的LC服务中心就诊的个体以及社区对照的比较样本。用于评估患者对LC所面临挑战感受的LC - ABNAS量表,被用来确定与LC相关的特定心理测量指标。结果:通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线得出ABNAS总分及其心理测量子集的最佳截断值。以新冠后功能状态(PCFS)等级≥2为真阳性,ABNAS总分≥21.5对LC的敏感性为81.6%,特异性为72.3%。ABNAS疲劳子量表得分≥8.5对LC的特异性为87.2%,而其敏感性为66.7%。ABNAS思维迟缓子量表得分≥4.5的敏感性为82.8%,特异性为70.3%。结论:ABNAS总分及其心理测量子集(疲劳和思维迟缓)对LC具有敏感性和特异性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e881/11999384/c15dbb227672/cureus-0017-00000082311-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e881/11999384/3a402f2b7ccb/cureus-0017-00000082311-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e881/11999384/2ee8a600a375/cureus-0017-00000082311-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e881/11999384/c15dbb227672/cureus-0017-00000082311-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e881/11999384/3a402f2b7ccb/cureus-0017-00000082311-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e881/11999384/2ee8a600a375/cureus-0017-00000082311-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e881/11999384/c15dbb227672/cureus-0017-00000082311-i03.jpg

相似文献

1
Analysis of the A-B Neuropsychological Assessment Schedule as a Cognitive Screener for Long COVID.作为长期新冠认知筛查工具的A-B神经心理学评估量表分析
Cureus. 2025 Apr 15;17(4):e82311. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82311. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
The A-B neuropsychological assessment schedule (ABNAS): the relationship between patient-perceived drug related cognitive impairment and results of neuropsychological tests.A-B神经心理学评估量表(ABNAS):患者感知的药物相关认知障碍与神经心理学测试结果之间的关系
Seizure. 2002 Jun;11(4):231-7. doi: 10.1053/seiz.2002.0672.
3
Cognitive impairment in adults with epilepsy: The relationship between subjective and objective assessments of cognition.成人癫痫患者的认知障碍:认知主观评估与客观评估之间的关系。
Epilepsy Behav. 2015 Nov;52(Pt A):9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.08.013. Epub 2015 Sep 19.
4
Evaluating subjective cognitive impairment in the adult epilepsy clinic: Effects of depression, number of antiepileptic medications, and seizure frequency.评估成人癫痫门诊中的主观认知障碍:抑郁、抗癫痫药物数量及癫痫发作频率的影响。
Epilepsy Behav. 2018 Apr;81:18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.10.011. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
5
The A-B neuropsychological assessment schedule (ABNAS): the further refinement of a patient-based scale of patient-perceived cognitive functioning.A-B神经心理评估量表(ABNAS):基于患者的患者感知认知功能量表的进一步完善。
Epilepsy Res. 2001 Mar;43(3):227-37. doi: 10.1016/s0920-1211(00)00198-4.
6
Migraine comorbidity and cognitive performance in patients with focal epilepsy.局灶性癫痫患者偏头痛共病与认知功能表现。
Epilepsy Behav. 2019 Aug;97:29-33. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.05.008. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
7
A review of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for characterizing Long COVID (LC)-merits, gaps, and recommendations.长新冠(LC)患者报告结局测量(PROMs)的评价:优点、差距和建议。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Aug 26;8(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00773-1.
8
Adverse effects of anti-epileptics in trigeminal neuralgiform pain.抗癫痫药治疗三叉神经痛样痛的不良反应。
Acta Neurol Scand. 2018 Jun;137(6):566-574. doi: 10.1111/ane.12901. Epub 2018 Jan 28.
9
Predictors of subjective cognitive complaint in postacute older adult stroke patients.急性后期老年脑卒中患者主观认知主诉的预测因素。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Sep;94(9):1747-52. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.02.026. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
10
Self-reported immune status and COVID-19 associated subjective cognitive functioning in post-COVID-19 syndrome: Examination of an Irish cohort.自我报告的免疫状态与 COVID-19 后综合征中的 COVID-19 相关主观认知功能:对爱尔兰队列的研究。
Brain Behav. 2024 Sep;14(9):e70027. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70027.

本文引用的文献

1
Self-reported immune status and COVID-19 associated subjective cognitive functioning in post-COVID-19 syndrome: Examination of an Irish cohort.自我报告的免疫状态与 COVID-19 后综合征中的 COVID-19 相关主观认知功能:对爱尔兰队列的研究。
Brain Behav. 2024 Sep;14(9):e70027. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70027.
2
Blood-brain barrier disruption and sustained systemic inflammation in individuals with long COVID-associated cognitive impairment.长新冠相关认知障碍患者的血脑屏障破坏和持续的全身炎症。
Nat Neurosci. 2024 Mar;27(3):421-432. doi: 10.1038/s41593-024-01576-9. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
3
Long COVID: Clinical characteristics, proposed pathogenesis and potential therapeutic targets.
长期新冠:临床特征、提出的发病机制及潜在治疗靶点。
Front Mol Biosci. 2023 Apr 26;10:1157651. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2023.1157651. eCollection 2023.
4
Long COVID: major findings, mechanisms and recommendations.长新冠:主要发现、机制和建议。
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2023 Mar;21(3):133-146. doi: 10.1038/s41579-022-00846-2. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
5
Associations of subjective and objective cognitive functioning after COVID-19: A six-month follow-up of ICU, ward, and home-isolated patients.新冠病毒感染后主观和客观认知功能的关联:对重症监护病房、普通病房及居家隔离患者的六个月随访
Brain Behav Immun Health. 2023 Feb;27:100587. doi: 10.1016/j.bbih.2023.100587. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
6
Impact of Long COVID on health and quality of life.新冠长期症状对健康和生活质量的影响。
HRB Open Res. 2022 Apr 22;5:31. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13516.1. eCollection 2022.
7
Screening for brain fog: Is the montreal cognitive assessment an effective screening tool for neurocognitive complaints post-COVID-19?脑雾筛查:蒙特利尔认知评估量表是否是 COVID-19 后神经认知主诉的有效筛查工具?
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2022 Sep-Oct;78:80-86. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2022.07.013. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
8
1-year quality of life and health-outcomes in patients hospitalised with COVID-19: a longitudinal cohort study.新型冠状病毒肺炎住院患者的1年生活质量和健康结局:一项纵向队列研究
Respir Res. 2022 May 4;23(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12931-022-02032-7.
9
Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Essentials of Diagnosis and Management.肌痛性脑脊髓炎/慢性疲劳综合征:诊断与管理要点。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2021 Nov;96(11):2861-2878. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.07.004. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
10
The Post-COVID-19 Functional Status scale: a tool to measure functional status over time after COVID-19.新冠后功能状态量表:一种用于测量 COVID-19 后随时间推移的功能状态的工具。
Eur Respir J. 2020 Jul 2;56(1). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01494-2020. Print 2020 Jul.