Suppr超能文献

作为长期新冠认知筛查工具的A-B神经心理学评估量表分析

Analysis of the A-B Neuropsychological Assessment Schedule as a Cognitive Screener for Long COVID.

作者信息

Radhakrishna Kishen, Holland Jessica, O'Keeffe Fiadhnait, Gaynor Keith, Kinsella Justin, Bramham Jessica

机构信息

Neurology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, IRL.

Neuropsychology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, IRL.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Apr 15;17(4):e82311. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82311. eCollection 2025 Apr.

Abstract

Aim To determine the sensitivity and specificity of the psychometric measures of the A-B Neuropsychological Assessment Schedule (ABNAS) to aid screening of long COVID (LC). Methods The participants (N=235) were recruited from an online study of cognitive and psychological consequences of LC, involving individuals attending an LC service in an acute tertiary university hospital and a comparison sample of community controls.The ABNAS for LC, a patient-perceived assessment scale in relation to the challenges they had encountered from LC, was used to identify the specific psychometric measures implicated in LC. Results The optimal cut-off value for total ABNAS scores and its psychometric subsets were obtained from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The sensitivity of the total ABNAS score of ≥21.5 was 81.6% for LC, taken as a post-COVID functional status (PCFS)grade of ≥ 2 as true positives, with a specificity = 72.3%. The specificity of the ABNAS fatigue subscale score of ≥ 8.5 for LC was 87.2%, while its sensitivity was 66.7%. The sensitivity of the ABNAS mental slowing subscale score of ≥ 4.5 was 82.8%, and the specificity was 70.3%. Conclusion Total ABNAS scores and their psychometric subsets (fatigue and mental slowing) are sensitive and specific for LC.

摘要

目的

确定A - B神经心理学评估量表(ABNAS)心理测量指标对辅助筛查长期新冠(LC)的敏感性和特异性。方法:参与者(N = 235)来自一项关于LC认知和心理后果的在线研究,包括在一家急性三级大学医院的LC服务中心就诊的个体以及社区对照的比较样本。用于评估患者对LC所面临挑战感受的LC - ABNAS量表,被用来确定与LC相关的特定心理测量指标。结果:通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线得出ABNAS总分及其心理测量子集的最佳截断值。以新冠后功能状态(PCFS)等级≥2为真阳性,ABNAS总分≥21.5对LC的敏感性为81.6%,特异性为72.3%。ABNAS疲劳子量表得分≥8.5对LC的特异性为87.2%,而其敏感性为66.7%。ABNAS思维迟缓子量表得分≥4.5的敏感性为82.8%,特异性为70.3%。结论:ABNAS总分及其心理测量子集(疲劳和思维迟缓)对LC具有敏感性和特异性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e881/11999384/3a402f2b7ccb/cureus-0017-00000082311-i01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验