• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

倭黑猩猩对不平等的奖励分配会产生厌恶反应。

Bonobos respond aversively to unequal reward distributions.

作者信息

Radovanović Kia, Lorskens Anoek, Schütte Sebastian, Bräuer Juliane, Call Josep, Haun Daniel B M, van Leeuwen Edwin J C

机构信息

Department of Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Department of Comparative Cultural Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2025 Apr;292(2045):20242873. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2873. Epub 2025 Apr 16.

DOI:10.1098/rspb.2024.2873
PMID:40237076
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12001075/
Abstract

Inequity aversion (IA) is the resistance to unequitable rewards given similar investments. It has been postulated as an important mechanism by which human cooperation thrives. To understand the evolutionary origin of human IA and its distribution across the animal kingdom, many species have been tested on IA, with mixed results. Whereas chimpanzees were originally found to show IA, more recent studies showed that their IA response could be explained by social disappointment. We conducted two studies on IA in bonobos using established paradigms: a token-exchange task and the social disappointment task. Bonobos could exchange tokens for equal or less-preferred food rewards than their partners (Study 1) and were tested with humans and machines to control for social disappointment effects (Study 2). We found that bonobos responded aversively to unequal food distributions in both studies, which was reflected by more refusals to participate when disadvantaged. Notably, and contrary to chimpanzees, this effect could not be explained by social disappointment, although Study 2 was only partially consistent with an IA explanation. Overall, our findings indicate that bonobos possess the sensitivity to recognize and respond to unfair treatment, which supports the notion that IA may have coevolved as a stabilizing mechanism for cooperation.

摘要

不平等厌恶(IA)是指在相似投入情况下对不公平奖励的抵制。它被假定为人类合作得以繁荣的一种重要机制。为了理解人类IA的进化起源及其在动物界的分布情况,人们对许多物种进行了IA测试,结果不一。虽然最初发现黑猩猩表现出IA,但最近的研究表明,它们的IA反应可以用社会失望来解释。我们使用既定范式对倭黑猩猩进行了两项关于IA的研究:一个代币交换任务和社会失望任务。在研究1中,倭黑猩猩可以用代币换取比同伴获得的同等或更不喜欢的食物奖励;在研究2中,倭黑猩猩与人类和机器进行测试,以控制社会失望效应。我们发现,在两项研究中,倭黑猩猩对不平等的食物分配都有厌恶反应,这表现为处于劣势时更多地拒绝参与。值得注意的是,与黑猩猩不同,这种效应不能用社会失望来解释,尽管研究2只是部分符合IA的解释。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,倭黑猩猩具有识别和应对不公平待遇的敏感性,这支持了IA可能作为合作的一种稳定机制而共同进化的观点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/045f/12001075/ea26903d8dc6/rspb.2024.2873.f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/045f/12001075/3487709e2865/rspb.2024.2873.f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/045f/12001075/b3f04c14ffb8/rspb.2024.2873.f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/045f/12001075/ea26903d8dc6/rspb.2024.2873.f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/045f/12001075/3487709e2865/rspb.2024.2873.f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/045f/12001075/b3f04c14ffb8/rspb.2024.2873.f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/045f/12001075/ea26903d8dc6/rspb.2024.2873.f003.jpg

相似文献

1
Bonobos respond aversively to unequal reward distributions.倭黑猩猩对不平等的奖励分配会产生厌恶反应。
Proc Biol Sci. 2025 Apr;292(2045):20242873. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2873. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
2
Behavioral and physiological response to inequity in bonobos (Pan paniscus).倭黑猩猩(Pan paniscus)对不公平的行为和生理反应。
Am J Primatol. 2023 Jan;85(1):e23455. doi: 10.1002/ajp.23455. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
3
Bonobos show limited social tolerance in a group setting: a comparison with chimpanzees and a test of the relational model.倭黑猩猩在群体环境中表现出有限的社会容忍度:与黑猩猩的比较及关系模型测试。
Folia Primatol (Basel). 2015;86(3):164-77. doi: 10.1159/000373886. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
4
Tolerance allows bonobos to outperform chimpanzees on a cooperative task.宽容使倭黑猩猩在合作任务中表现优于黑猩猩。
Curr Biol. 2007 Apr 3;17(7):619-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.02.040. Epub 2007 Mar 8.
5
Behavioural diversity of bonobo prey preference as a potential cultural trait.倭黑猩猩猎物偏好行为多样性可能是一种潜在的文化特征。
Elife. 2020 Sep 1;9:e59191. doi: 10.7554/eLife.59191.
6
Social grooming among wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Wamba in the Luo Scientific Reserve, DR Congo, with special reference to the formation of grooming gatherings.刚果民主共和国洛科学保护区万巴的野生倭黑猩猩(Pan paniscus)之间的社交梳理行为,特别提及梳理聚会的形成。
Primates. 2013 Oct;54(4):349-59. doi: 10.1007/s10329-013-0354-6. Epub 2013 Apr 27.
7
Comparing infant and juvenile behavior in bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): a preliminary study.倭黑猩猩(Pan paniscus)与黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)婴幼儿行为比较:一项初步研究。
Primates. 2006 Oct;47(4):287-93. doi: 10.1007/s10329-006-0179-7. Epub 2006 May 9.
8
Token transfers among great apes (Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, and Pan troglodytes): species differences, gestural requests, and reciprocal exchange.大猩猩(西部大猩猩、婆罗洲猩猩、倭黑猩猩和黑猩猩)之间的代币转移:物种差异、手势请求和互惠交换。
J Comp Psychol. 2009 Nov;123(4):375-84. doi: 10.1037/a0017253.
9
Investigating the Function of Mutual Grooming in Captive Bonobos (Pan paniscus) and Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).研究圈养倭黑猩猩(Pan paniscus)和黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)中相互梳理毛发行为的功能。
Folia Primatol (Basel). 2020;91(5):481-494. doi: 10.1159/000506308. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
10
Tolerant food sharing and reciprocity is precluded by despotism among bonobos but not chimpanzees.倭黑猩猩之间存在专制,而黑猩猩之间没有,这使得倭黑猩猩不能容忍食物共享和互惠,而黑猩猩可以。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2010 Sep;143(1):41-51. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.21288.

本文引用的文献

1
Cooperation across social borders in bonobos.倭黑猩猩的跨社会边界合作。
Science. 2023 Nov 17;382(6672):805-809. doi: 10.1126/science.adg0844. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
2
Social disappointment and partner presence affect long-tailed macaque refusal behaviour in an 'inequity aversion' experiment.在一项“公平厌恶”实验中,社会失望感和伙伴的在场会影响猕猴的拒绝行为。
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Mar 1;10(3):221225. doi: 10.1098/rsos.221225. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
Does tolerance allow bonobos to outperform chimpanzees on a cooperative task? A conceptual replication of Hare ., 2007.
耐受性是否能让倭黑猩猩在合作任务中表现优于黑猩猩?对黑尔等人(2007年)的概念性复制。
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Jan 4;10(1):220194. doi: 10.1098/rsos.220194. eCollection 2023 Jan.
4
Attention toward emotions is modulated by familiarity with the expressor: A comparison between bonobos and humans.对情绪的关注会因对表达者的熟悉程度而受到调节:倭黑猩猩与人类的比较。
Emotion. 2023 Oct;23(7):1904-1917. doi: 10.1037/emo0000882. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
5
Behavioral and physiological response to inequity in bonobos (Pan paniscus).倭黑猩猩(Pan paniscus)对不公平的行为和生理反应。
Am J Primatol. 2023 Jan;85(1):e23455. doi: 10.1002/ajp.23455. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
6
Intra-specific Variation in the Social Behavior of Barbary macaques ().巴巴里猕猴社会行为的种内变异()
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 13;12:666166. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.666166. eCollection 2021.
7
Group-level cooperation in chimpanzees is shaped by strong social ties.群体层面上的黑猩猩合作受强烈社会联系的影响。
Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 22;12(1):539. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20709-9.
8
Behavioural diversity of bonobo prey preference as a potential cultural trait.倭黑猩猩猎物偏好行为多样性可能是一种潜在的文化特征。
Elife. 2020 Sep 1;9:e59191. doi: 10.7554/eLife.59191.
9
Why intergroup variation matters for understanding behaviour.为什么群体间的差异对于理解行为很重要。
Biol Lett. 2019 Nov 29;15(11):20190695. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2019.0695. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
10
Inequity aversion in dogs: a review.犬类的不公平厌恶:综述
Learn Behav. 2018 Dec;46(4):479-500. doi: 10.3758/s13420-018-0338-x.