• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用Grad-CAM比较卷积神经网络(CNNs)和Transformer模型在骨扫描中诊断骨转移的效果

Comparison of CNNs and Transformer Models in Diagnosing Bone Metastases in Bone Scans Using Grad-CAM.

作者信息

Pak Sehyun, Son Hye Joo, Kim Dongwoo, Woo Ji Young, Yang Ik, Hwang Hee Sung, Rim Dohyoung, Choi Min Seok, Lee Suk Hyun

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Gangwon, Republic of Korea.

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Dankook University Medical Center, Cheonan, Chungnam, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Clin Nucl Med. 2025 Jul 1;50(7):596-604. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000005898. Epub 2025 Apr 16.

DOI:10.1097/RLU.0000000000005898
PMID:40237349
Abstract

PURPOSE

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been studied for detecting bone metastases on bone scans; however, the application of ConvNeXt and transformer models has not yet been explored. This study aims to evaluate the performance of various deep learning models, including the ConvNeXt and transformer models, in diagnosing metastatic lesions from bone scans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed bone scans from patients with cancer obtained at 2 institutions: the training and validation sets (n=4626) were from Hospital 1 and the test set (n=1428) was from Hospital 2. The deep learning models evaluated included ResNet18, the Data-Efficient Image Transformer (DeiT), the Vision Transformer (ViT Large 16), the Swin Transformer (Swin Base), and ConvNeXt Large. Gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) was used for visualization.

RESULTS

Both the validation set and the test set demonstrated that the ConvNeXt large model (0.969 and 0.885, respectively) exhibited the best performance, followed by the Swin Base model (0.965 and 0.840, respectively), both of which significantly outperformed ResNet (0.892 and 0.725, respectively). Subgroup analyses revealed that all the models demonstrated greater diagnostic accuracy for patients with polymetastasis compared with those with oligometastasis. Grad-CAM visualization revealed that the ConvNeXt Large model focused more on identifying local lesions, whereas the Swin Base model focused on global areas such as the axial skeleton and pelvis.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with traditional CNN and transformer models, the ConvNeXt model demonstrated superior diagnostic performance in detecting bone metastases from bone scans, especially in cases of polymetastasis, suggesting its potential in medical image analysis.

摘要

目的

卷积神经网络(CNN)已被用于骨扫描中骨转移灶的检测;然而,ConvNeXt和Transformer模型的应用尚未得到探索。本研究旨在评估包括ConvNeXt和Transformer模型在内的各种深度学习模型在诊断骨扫描转移灶中的性能。

材料与方法

我们回顾性分析了在两家机构获取的癌症患者的骨扫描:训练集和验证集(n = 4626)来自医院1,测试集(n = 1428)来自医院2。评估的深度学习模型包括ResNet18、数据高效图像变换器(DeiT)、视觉变换器(ViT Large 16)、Swin变换器(Swin Base)和ConvNeXt Large。采用梯度加权类激活映射(Grad-CAM)进行可视化。

结果

验证集和测试集均显示,ConvNeXt large模型(分别为0.969和0.885)表现最佳,其次是Swin Base模型(分别为0.965和0.840),这两个模型均显著优于ResNet(分别为0.892和0.725)。亚组分析显示,与寡转移患者相比,所有模型对多转移患者的诊断准确性更高。Grad-CAM可视化显示,ConvNeXt Large模型更专注于识别局部病变,而Swin Base模型则专注于轴向骨骼和骨盆等全局区域。

结论

与传统的CNN和Transformer模型相比,ConvNeXt模型在检测骨扫描中的骨转移灶方面表现出卓越的诊断性能,尤其是在多转移病例中,表明其在医学图像分析中的潜力。

相似文献

1
Comparison of CNNs and Transformer Models in Diagnosing Bone Metastases in Bone Scans Using Grad-CAM.使用Grad-CAM比较卷积神经网络(CNNs)和Transformer模型在骨扫描中诊断骨转移的效果
Clin Nucl Med. 2025 Jul 1;50(7):596-604. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000005898. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
2
Recognition and diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease using T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging via integrating CNN and Swin vision transformer.通过整合卷积神经网络(CNN)和Swin视觉变换器,利用T1加权磁共振成像对阿尔茨海默病进行识别和诊断。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2025 Jun 17;80:100673. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2025.100673.
3
Assessing the comparative effects of interventions in COPD: a tutorial on network meta-analysis for clinicians.评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病干预措施的比较效果:面向临床医生的网状Meta分析教程
Respir Res. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-03056-x.
4
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2022.暴力死亡监测——2022年全国暴力死亡报告系统,50个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025 Jun 12;74(5):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7405a1.
5
Learning hemodynamic scalar fields on coronary artery meshes: A benchmark of geometric deep learning models.在冠状动脉网格上学习血流动力学标量场:几何深度学习模型的基准测试
Comput Biol Med. 2025 Jun 17;195:110477. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110477.
6
Anti-VEGF drugs compared with laser photocoagulation for the treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.抗血管内皮生长因子药物与激光光凝术治疗增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变的比较:一项系统评价和个体参与者数据荟萃分析
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Apr 2:1-75. doi: 10.3310/MJYP6578.
7
Molecular feature-based classification of retroperitoneal liposarcoma: a prospective cohort study.基于分子特征的腹膜后脂肪肉瘤分类:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Elife. 2025 May 23;14:RP100887. doi: 10.7554/eLife.100887.
8
Dual-energy CT Radiomics Combined with Quantitative Parameters for Differentiating Lung Adenocarcinoma From Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Dual-center Study.双能量CT影像组学联合定量参数鉴别肺腺癌与肺鳞癌:一项双中心研究
Acad Radiol. 2025 Mar;32(3):1675-1684. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.09.024. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
9
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
10
Interventions for fertility preservation in women with cancer undergoing chemotherapy.对接受化疗的癌症女性进行生育力保存的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 19;6:CD012891. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012891.pub2.