Hatim Lana, Denning David W
Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, UK.
Chron Respir Dis. 2025 Jan-Dec;22:14799731251326592. doi: 10.1177/14799731251326592. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
BackgroundDiagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) or extrinsic allergic alveolitis requires a combination of tests with antibody testing playing a supportive role to identify exposures.ObjectivesWe conducted a scoping review on antibody testing in -related HP to identify the utility and diagnostic cutoffs proposed in the literature. We compared these cutoffs with studies of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) and manufacturers' cutoffs.Eligibility criteriaOnly studies addressing the diagnostic value of IgG or precipitins for HP were included. Separately papers defining cutoffs for CPA were tabulated.Sources of evidencePublished papers were identified in literature searches in Embase, Web of Science, and Medline.ResultsWe identified 414 papers, of which 12 were included, all published between 1965 and 2005. Occupational HP linked to spp. exposure included Farmer's Lung, Malt-Worker's Lung, Esparto Worker's Lung, and Woodworker's lung (Sawmill-workers). No studies directly addressed serological testing in Tobacco Worker's lung, Compost Lung, or poultry workers. Among species exposure, was most commonly described; others included (now ), , and . Antibody tests included ELISA, BALISA, precipitin tests and ImmunoCAP, with a higher sensitivity of ELISA and ImmunoCAP tests compared to precipitin tests. Patients with HP linked to exposures, were positive in 156/290 (53.8%) compared to 96/615 (15.6%) in those with similar occupational exposures without HP. In malt workers with HP 35/53 (66%) had detectable IgG antibody compared to 0/53 IgG, and 13/74 (18%) exposed but unaffected workers, but are not commercially available.ConclusionsImproved means of establishing or ruling out exposure are required, given the negative consequences for patients of continued inhalation. Modern studies with commercially available IgG antibody assays are required to define appropriate cutoffs for HP, given numerous studies published for chronic pulmonary aspergillosis.
背景
过敏性肺炎(HP)或外源性过敏性肺泡炎的诊断需要多种检查相结合,抗体检测在识别暴露因素方面起辅助作用。
目的
我们对与HP相关的抗体检测进行了一项范围综述,以确定文献中提出的效用和诊断临界值。我们将这些临界值与慢性肺曲霉病(CPA)的研究以及制造商的临界值进行了比较。
纳入标准
仅纳入涉及IgG或沉淀素对HP诊断价值的研究。另外,将定义CPA临界值的论文制成表格。
证据来源
在Embase、Web of Science和Medline的文献检索中识别已发表的论文。
结果
我们识别出414篇论文,其中12篇被纳入,均发表于1965年至2005年之间。与接触特定菌种相关的职业性HP包括农民肺、麦芽工人肺、西班牙草工人肺和木工肺(锯木厂工人)。没有研究直接涉及烟草工人肺、堆肥肺或家禽工人的血清学检测。在特定菌种暴露中,最常描述的是某种菌种;其他包括某种菌种(现为另一种菌种)、某种菌种和某种菌种。抗体检测包括ELISA、BALISA、沉淀素试验和免疫化学发光法,与沉淀素试验相比,ELISA和免疫化学发光法检测的灵敏度更高。与无HP的类似职业暴露者相比,与特定菌种暴露相关的HP患者中,156/290(53.8%)呈阳性,而96/615(15.6%)呈阳性。在患有HP的麦芽工人中,35/53(66%)可检测到特定菌种IgG抗体,而在53名未检测到IgG的工人以及13/74(18%)暴露但未受影响的工人中未检测到,但这些检测在商业上不可用。
结论
鉴于持续吸入特定物质对患者的负面影响,需要改进确定或排除特定物质暴露的方法。鉴于已发表了大量关于慢性肺曲霉病的研究,则需要采用可商购的特定菌种IgG抗体检测方法进行现代研究,以确定HP的合适临界值。