Suppr超能文献

美国医疗保险参保老年人急诊出院后基于电话的认知评估及医疗保健利用的可行性

Feasibility of Telephone-Based Cognitive Assessments and Healthcare Utilization in US Medicare-Enrolled Older Adults Following Emergency Department Discharge.

作者信息

Dawson Walter D, Spoden Natasha, Gothard Sarah, Mattek Nora, Kaye Jeffrey, Wright Kirsten

机构信息

Oregon Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.

出版信息

Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2025 Apr;40(4):e70078. doi: 10.1002/gps.70078.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Wider screening and assessment for Alzheimer's disease and other related dementias (ADRD) may increase access to supportive care, improve allocation of medical care, and foster the use of interventions that prevent or delay disease progression. Yet, the effect of diagnostic timing on clinical and utilization outcomes is poorly understood. Community-based settings such as a hospital emergency department (ED) may be an underrecognized opportunity to assess cognition and impacts on individuals and health systems. This study assessed the feasibility of recruiting older adults for telephone-based trials following presentation to the ED and administering telephone based cognitive assessments over the phone in this population.

METHODS

Medicare-enrolled individuals 65+ years of age (n = 160) presenting to the Oregon Health & Science University Emergency Department (Portland, Oregon) between May 2022 and February 2023 were recruited by telephone. Participants were administered the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS) Assessment and the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Cognitive Measure Questions on Mental Clarity via telephone 1-12 weeks post-discharge to evaluate cognition. Electronic medical records (EMR) were reviewed for medical care utilization including primary care provider (PCP) visits, hospital admissions, and ED visits for the 3 years prior to ED presentation.

RESULTS

Twenty-six percent of eligible ED users contacted elected for study enrollment. The TICS Assessment score had a significant relationship with the three evaluated health care utilization measures (ED, PCP visits, or hospitalizations); the PROMIS Assessment had significant but weak correlations to ED and PCP visits.

CONCLUSIONS

Older adults 65+ years presenting to the ED are amenable to enroll in telephone-based cognition-focused trials and cognitive assessments can be carried out over the telephone in this population. The PROMIS Assessment may be a better cognition assessment tool when evaluating for cognition and care utilization in this population. In addition to the limits of the screening tools used in this study, a lack of a representative sample is a limitation of the study design. Future studies could use other validated cognitive assessment tools and utilize a study design with a recruitment strategy focused on obtaining a representative sample of older ED patients.

摘要

背景

对阿尔茨海默病及其他相关痴呆症(ADRD)进行更广泛的筛查和评估,可能会增加获得支持性护理的机会,改善医疗护理的分配,并促进预防或延缓疾病进展的干预措施的使用。然而,诊断时机对临床和使用结果的影响却鲜为人知。像医院急诊科(ED)这样的社区环境,可能是一个未被充分认识的评估认知以及对个人和卫生系统影响的机会。本研究评估了在老年人到急诊科就诊后招募他们参加基于电话的试验,并在该人群中通过电话进行基于电话的认知评估的可行性。

方法

通过电话招募了2022年5月至2023年2月期间到俄勒冈健康与科学大学急诊科(俄勒冈州波特兰)就诊的65岁及以上参加医疗保险的个人(n = 160)。在出院后1 - 12周通过电话对参与者进行认知状态电话访谈(TICS)评估以及患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)关于思维清晰度的认知测量问题,以评估认知情况。回顾电子病历(EMR)以获取就诊前3年的医疗护理使用情况,包括初级保健提供者(PCP)就诊、住院和急诊科就诊情况。

结果

被联系的符合条件的急诊科使用者中有26%选择参加研究。TICS评估得分与三项评估的医疗护理使用指标(急诊科就诊、PCP就诊或住院)有显著关系;PROMIS评估与急诊科就诊和PCP就诊有显著但较弱的相关性。

结论

65岁及以上到急诊科就诊的老年人适合参加基于电话的以认知为重点的试验,并且可以在该人群中通过电话进行认知评估。在评估该人群的认知和护理使用情况时,PROMIS评估可能是一个更好的认知评估工具。除了本研究中使用的筛查工具的局限性外,缺乏代表性样本是研究设计的一个局限性。未来的研究可以使用其他经过验证的认知评估工具,并采用一种招募策略侧重于获取老年急诊科患者代表性样本的研究设计。

相似文献

1
美国医疗保险参保老年人急诊出院后基于电话的认知评估及医疗保健利用的可行性
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2025 Apr;40(4):e70078. doi: 10.1002/gps.70078.
2
痴呆的按服务收费 Medicare 受益人对国家急诊部门的利用模式。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Oct;72(10):3140-3148. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19025. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
3
在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
高医疗费用利用率与以患者为中心的医疗之家实施的纵向变化之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Feb 5;3(2):e1920500. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20500.
5
使用急诊部的 Medicare 受益人在家中健康天数的趋势。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Oct;71(10):3122-3133. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18464. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
6
电话随访以减少老年急诊科患者的非计划性医院返诊:一项随机试验。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Nov;69(11):3157-3166. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17336. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
7
墨西哥裔美国医疗保险受益人与阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症患者与非患者的医疗保健利用情况。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 15;15(1):e0227681. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227681. eCollection 2020.
9
功能状态、认知、社会支持和老年综合征与急诊科入院的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Aug 1;183(8):784-792. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.2149.

本文引用的文献

1
研究中的多样性、社区参与和共同设计:快速综述
BMJ Lead. 2024 Nov 27. doi: 10.1136/leader-2024-001046.
3
老年人在传统医疗保险和医疗保险优势计划下急诊护理的总费用和自付费用。
Ann Emerg Med. 2024 Sep;84(3):285-294. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.04.023. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
4
2024 年阿尔茨海默病事实和数据。
Alzheimers Dement. 2024 May;20(5):3708-3821. doi: 10.1002/alz.13809. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
5
美国老年人因跌倒受伤而进行急诊科就诊和住院治疗的费用。
Injury. 2024 Feb;55(2):111199. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.111199. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
6
招募代表性不足的研究参与者的障碍与促进因素:临床研究协调员的观点
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Aug 18;7(1):e193. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.611. eCollection 2023.
7
通过视频会议进行的蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)测评
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 Dec;24(12):1942-1947.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.08.015. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
9
远程医疗等效的蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA):来自埃默里健康大脑研究(EHBS)的结果。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Jun;71(6):1931-1936. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18271. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
10
早期阿尔茨海默病中的lecanemab
N Engl J Med. 2023 Jan 5;388(1):9-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2212948. Epub 2022 Nov 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验