McCabe Catherine, Connolly Leona, Quintana Yuri, Weir Arielle, Moen Anne, Ingvar Martin, McCann Margaret, Doyle Carmel, Hughes Mary, Brenner Maria
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Department of Clinical Informatics, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Boston, MA, United States.
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 16;27:e68757. doi: 10.2196/68757.
Digital health interventions (DHIs) have the potential to improve health care and health promotion. However, there is a lack of guidance in the literature for the development, refinement, and prioritization of key performance indicators (KPIs) for the evaluation of DHIs. This paper presents a 4-stage process used in the Gravitate Health project based on stakeholder consultation and consensus for this purpose. The Gravitate Health consortium, which comprises private and public partners from across Europe and the United States, is developing innovative digital health solutions in the form of Federated Open-Source Platform and G-lens to present users with individualized digital information about their medicines. The first stage of this was the consultative process for the development of KPIs involving stakeholder (Gravitate Health project leads) consultations at the planning stages of the project. This resulted in the formation of an extensive list of KPIs organized into 7 categories. The second stage was conducting a scoping review, which confirmed the need for extensive stakeholder consultation in all stages of the KPI development, refinement, and prioritization process. The third stage was a period of further consultation with all consortium members, which resulted in the elimination of 1 category of KPIs. The fourth stage involved using the Delphi technique for refining and prioritizing the remaining 6 categories of KPIs. It is unusual to use this methodology in a nonresearch exercise, but it provided a clear consultative framework and structure that facilitated the achievement of consensus within a large consortium of 250 members on a substantial list of KPIs for the project. Consortium members ranked the relevance and importance of each KPI. The final list of KPIs provides substantial indicators sensitive to the needs of a broad group of stakeholders that are being used to capture real-world data in developing and evaluating DHIs.
数字健康干预措施(DHIs)有改善医疗保健和健康促进的潜力。然而,文献中缺乏关于数字健康干预措施评估关键绩效指标(KPI)的开发、完善和优先级确定的指导。本文介绍了Gravitate Health项目中基于利益相关者协商和共识为此目的使用的一个4阶段流程。Gravitate Health联盟由来自欧洲和美国的公私合作伙伴组成,正在开发以联合开源平台和G-lens形式的创新数字健康解决方案,以便为用户提供有关其药物的个性化数字信息。此流程的第一阶段是制定关键绩效指标的协商过程,涉及在项目规划阶段与利益相关者(Gravitate Health项目负责人)进行协商。这产生了一份广泛的关键绩效指标清单,分为7类。第二阶段是进行范围审查,确认在关键绩效指标的开发、完善和优先级确定过程的所有阶段都需要广泛的利益相关者协商。第三阶段是与所有联盟成员进行进一步协商的时期,结果是消除了1类关键绩效指标。第四阶段涉及使用德尔菲技术对其余6类关键绩效指标进行完善和确定优先级。在非研究活动中使用这种方法并不常见,但它提供了一个清晰的协商框架和结构,有助于在一个由250名成员组成的大型联盟中就该项目的大量关键绩效指标清单达成共识。联盟成员对每个关键绩效指标的相关性和重要性进行了排名。最终的关键绩效指标清单提供了对广泛利益相关者群体的需求敏感的大量指标,这些指标正被用于在开发和评估数字健康干预措施时获取实际数据。