Ranade Ketki, Shankarappa Mohan Raju, Kumar Neeraj, Somaiya Aryan
Tata Institute of Social Sciences, VN Purav Marg, Mumbai, 400088, India.
Mylife Psychologists, Alexandria, NSW, 2150, Australia.
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 16;25(1):387. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06740-4.
Last decade in India has seen increasing visibility and dialogue on trans health including gender affirmative interventions. This has been enabled by growing mobilisation and assertion from trans communities and a range of legal and policy changes supporting trans inclusion. In this paper, we focus on mental health assessment of gender dysphoria/ incongruence that is the first and an essential step for a transgender person in the Indian context to be able to access medical and surgical gender affirmative interventions. We discuss findings of a mixed-method, exploratory study conducted with 165 mental health professionals (MHPs) in three cities of India. In this paper we primarily present qualitative data on MHPs' understanding of gender incongruence, their practice of assessment, rationale for the same and ways in which they end up gatekeeping access to medical and surgical gender affirmative interventions. Concepts such as biological determinism of gender, trans normativity, pathologisation of trans and gender diversity, mental stability and capacity are used to critically discuss findings.
在过去十年里,印度对跨性别健康(包括性别肯定性干预措施)的关注和讨论日益增加。跨性别群体动员和主张的不断增强,以及一系列支持跨性别群体融入的法律和政策变化,推动了这一现象的出现。在本文中,我们聚焦于性别焦虑/不一致的心理健康评估,这是印度跨性别者能够获得医学和手术性别肯定性干预措施的首要且关键的一步。我们讨论了在印度三个城市对165名心理健康专业人员(MHP)进行的一项混合方法探索性研究的结果。在本文中,我们主要呈现关于心理健康专业人员对性别不一致的理解、他们的评估实践、评估理由,以及他们最终如何把关医学和手术性别肯定性干预措施获取途径的定性数据。我们运用诸如性别生物决定论、跨性别规范性、跨性别及性别多样性的病理化、心理稳定性和能力等概念来批判性地讨论研究结果。