Suess Schwend Amets
Research Group "Others. Feminist Perspectives in Social Research" (SEJ-430), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Public Health Rev. 2020 Feb 19;41:3. doi: 10.1186/s40985-020-0118-y. eCollection 2020.
Trans people are exposed to multiple human right violations in clinical practice and research. From 1975 on, gender transition processes have been classified as a mental disorder in diagnostic classification manuals, a classification that was removed recently from ICD, International Classification of Diseases, and continues in DSM, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Trans people in different world regions are forced to accept psychiatric diagnoses and assessment in order to get access to trans health care, subject to reparative therapies and exposed to transphobic institutional and social discrimination and violence. In many countries, gender identity laws include medical requirements, such as psychiatric diagnosis, hormone treatment, genital surgery, or sterilization. In the scientific literature, a frequent pathologization of trans experiences can be identified, by means of pathologizing conceptualizations, terminologies, visual representations, and practices, as well as ethnocentric biases. Trans activism and scholarship have questioned widely the pathologization of trans people in clinical practice and research. Over the last decade, an international trans depathologization movement emerged, demanding, among other claims, the removal of the diagnostic classification of transexuality as a mental disorder, as well as changes in the health care and legal context. International and regional bodies built up a human rights framework related to sexual, gender and bodily diversity that constitute a relevant reference point for trans depathologization activism. The Yogyakarta Principles, published in 2007 and extended in 2017 by means of the Yogyakarta Principles plus 10, establish an application of international human rights law in relation to sexual orientation, gender expression, gender identity, and sex characteristics. International and regional human rights bodies included demands related to depathologization in their agenda. More recently, advancements towards trans depathologization can be observed in the diagnostic classifications, as well as in the health care and legal context. At the same time, trans people continue being exposed to pathologization and transphobic violence. The Human Rights in Patient Care (HRPC) framework offers a human right-based approach on health care practices. The paper aims at analyzing the shared human rights focus and potential alliances between the trans depathologization perspective and the HRPC framework.
跨性别者在临床实践和研究中面临多种人权侵犯。自1975年起,性别转变过程在诊断分类手册中被归类为精神障碍,这一分类最近已从《国际疾病分类》(ICD)中删除,但仍保留在《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)中。不同世界地区的跨性别者为了获得跨性别医疗保健,被迫接受精神科诊断和评估,接受修复疗法,并遭受恐跨的机构和社会歧视及暴力。在许多国家,性别认同法律包含医学要求,如精神科诊断、激素治疗、生殖器手术或绝育。在科学文献中,可以通过将概念、术语、视觉呈现和实践病理化以及种族中心主义偏见,发现对跨性别经历的频繁病理化现象。跨性别维权运动和学术研究广泛质疑了临床实践和研究中对跨性别者的病理化。在过去十年中,一场国际跨性别去病理化运动兴起,除其他诉求外,要求将变性欲作为精神障碍的诊断分类删除,并改变医疗保健和法律环境。国际和区域机构建立了一个与性、性别和身体多样性相关的人权框架,这构成了跨性别去病理化维权运动的一个相关参考点。2007年发布并于2017年通过《日惹原则+10》进行扩展的《日惹原则》确立了国际人权法在性取向、性别表达、性别认同和性特征方面的应用。国际和区域人权机构将与去病理化相关的要求纳入了他们的议程。最近,在诊断分类以及医疗保健和法律环境方面可以观察到跨性别去病理化的进展。与此同时,跨性别者继续面临病理化和恐跨暴力。“患者护理中的人权”(HRPC)框架提供了一种基于人权的医疗保健实践方法。本文旨在分析跨性别去病理化视角与HRPC框架之间共同的人权关注点和潜在联盟。