Yang Zhengshi, Zhuang Xiaowei, Koenig Katherine A, Leverenz James B, Curran Tim, Lowe Mark J, Cordes Dietmar
Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Las Vegas, NV, United States.
Imaging Institute, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024 Dec 19;2:1-15. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00404. eCollection 2024 Dec 1.
Investigating the mechanism of differentiating similar representations, known as pattern separation, has primarily focused on the hippocampus. The roles of cortical regions and their interaction with the hippocampus remain largely unclear. In this study, we address this topic by analyzing whole-brain, high-resolution mnemonic similarity task (MST) fMRI data collected with a 7-Tesla MR scanner. Structural and functional MRI data were acquired from 55 non-demented elderly subjects. During the encoding phase of the MST task, participants responded with "indoor" or "outdoor" to 66 everyday objects. In the recognition phase, participants were asked to make "same" / "similar" / "new" judgments about objects that were either the same as previously seen objects (targets), similar but different from previously seen objects (lures), or new objects (foils). A general linear model was conducted on hippocampal regions of interest (ROIs) and at the whole-brain level with five conditions, including "new" response to foils (foil), "same" response to targets (hit), correct "similar" response to lure (lure correct rejection, LureCR), false "same" response to lure (lure false alarm, LureFA), and one condition for all others. The activity difference when lures were identified as "similar" compared to "same" (LureCR vs. LureFA) was used to assess if a region is involved in pattern separation. An association analysis was conducted to test if lure discrimination performance was correlated with activity difference of hippocampal ROIs between LureCR and LureFA, as well as age. Task-based functional connectivity between hippocampal ROIs and other regions involved in pattern separation was examined. In the hippocampal ROI analysis, left anterior CA3/DG showed greater activity in LureCR condition compared to LureFA. All other hippocampal ROIs did not show differential activity. Better lure discrimination performance was associated with larger activity difference between LureCR and LureFA at left anterior CA3/DG and right anterior subiculum. In the whole-brain analyses, regions in the frontoparietal network (FPN) consistently showed increased activity in the Hit, LureCR, and LureFA conditions, and the activity was right-lateralized for Hit and LureFA conditions but bilateral for LureCR condition. Eleven clusters, mainly located in the left hemisphere, were identified to show significant activity difference between LureCR and LureFA condition, including left FPN, middle temporal lobe, and subcortical regions. In summary, with the whole-brain high-resolution MST fMRI data, regions exhibiting the pattern separation signature were found to be lateralized to the left hemisphere in elderly participants. The left and right FPN are suggested to have distinct functional roles in the MST. The right FPN contributes to retrieving previously viewed same or similar objects, while the left FPN is preferentially involved in pattern separation. Furthermore, the pattern separation process might require the coordinated effort of FPN and hippocampus, with their interaction potentially mediated by subcortical regions.
探究区分相似表征(即模式分离)的机制主要聚焦于海马体。皮质区域的作用及其与海马体的相互作用在很大程度上仍不清楚。在本研究中,我们通过分析使用7特斯拉磁共振扫描仪收集的全脑、高分辨率记忆相似性任务(MST)功能磁共振成像数据来探讨这一主题。从55名非痴呆老年受试者获取了结构和功能磁共振成像数据。在MST任务的编码阶段,参与者对66个日常物品做出“室内”或“室外”的反应。在识别阶段,要求参与者对与先前看到的物品相同(目标)、相似但不同(诱饵)或新物品(陪衬)的物品做出“相同”/“相似”/“新”的判断。在海马体感兴趣区域(ROI)和全脑水平上,针对五个条件进行了一般线性模型分析,包括对陪衬的“新”反应(陪衬)、对目标的“相同”反应(命中)、对诱饵的正确“相似”反应(诱饵正确拒绝,LureCR)、对诱饵的错误“相同”反应(诱饵错误警报,LureFA)以及针对所有其他情况的一个条件。将诱饵被识别为“相似”与“相同”时的活动差异(LureCR与LureFA)用于评估一个区域是否参与模式分离。进行了关联分析,以测试诱饵辨别性能是否与LureCR和LureFA之间海马体ROI的活动差异以及年龄相关。检查了海马体ROI与参与模式分离的其他区域之间基于任务的功能连接。在海马体ROI分析中,与LureFA相比,左侧前CA3/DG在LureCR条件下表现出更大的活动。所有其他海马体ROI未显示出差异活动。更好的诱饵辨别性能与左侧前CA3/DG和右侧前下托在LureCR和LureFA之间更大的活动差异相关。在全脑分析中,额顶网络(FPN)区域在命中、LureCR和LureFA条件下持续显示活动增加,命中和LureFA条件下活动在右侧偏侧化,而LureCR条件下活动是双侧的。识别出11个主要位于左侧半球的簇,显示出LureCR和LureFA条件之间存在显著活动差异,包括左侧FPN、颞中叶和皮质下区域。总之,利用全脑高分辨率MST功能磁共振成像数据,发现老年参与者中表现出模式分离特征的区域在左侧半球偏侧化。提示左右FPN在MST中具有不同的功能作用。右侧FPN有助于检索先前看到的相同或相似物品,而左侧FPN优先参与模式分离。此外,模式分离过程可能需要FPN和海马体的协同努力,它们之间的相互作用可能由皮质下区域介导。