Suppr超能文献

在静息态 fMRI 研究中,应该选择哪个多频段因子?

Which multiband factor should you choose for your resting-state fMRI study?

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Atlanta, GA, United States.

Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Atlanta, GA, United States.

出版信息

Neuroimage. 2021 Jul 1;234:117965. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117965. Epub 2021 Mar 17.

Abstract

Multiband acquisition, also called simultaneous multislice, has become a popular technique in resting-state functional connectivity studies. Multiband (MB) acceleration leads to a higher temporal resolution but also leads to spatially heterogeneous noise amplification, suggesting the costs may be greater in areas such as the subcortex. We evaluate MB factors of 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, and 12 with 2 mm isotropic voxels, and additionally 2 mm and 3.3 mm single-band acquisitions, on a 32-channel head coil. Noise amplification was greater in deeper brain regions, including subcortical regions. Correlations were attenuated by noise amplification, which resulted in spatially varying biases that were more severe at higher MB factors. Temporal filtering decreased spatial biases in correlations due to noise amplification, but also tended to decrease effect sizes. In seed-based correlation maps, left-right putamen connectivity and thalamo-motor connectivity were highest in the single-band 3.3 mm protocol. In correlation matrices, MB 4, 6, and 8 had a greater number of significant correlations than the other acquisitions (both with and without temporal filtering). We recommend single-band 3.3 mm for seed-based subcortical analyses, and MB 4 provides a reasonable balance for studies analyzing both seed-based correlation maps and connectivity matrices. In multiband studies including secondary analyses of large-scale datasets, we recommend reporting effect sizes or test statistics instead of correlations. If correlations are reported, temporal filtering (or another method for thermal noise removal) should be used. The Emory Multiband Dataset is available on OpenNeuro.

摘要

多频带采集,也称为同时多层采集,已成为静息态功能连接研究中的一种流行技术。多频带(MB)加速可提高时间分辨率,但也会导致空间异质噪声放大,这表明在皮质下等区域,成本可能更高。我们在 32 通道头部线圈上评估了 MB 因子为 2、3、4、6、8、9 和 12 的 2mm 各向同性体素,以及另外 2mm 和 3.3mm 单频带采集。在更深的脑区(包括皮质下区域)中,噪声放大更为明显。相关性因噪声放大而减弱,导致空间变异性偏差在更高的 MB 因子下更为严重。时间滤波由于噪声放大降低了相关性中的空间偏差,但也倾向于降低效应大小。在基于种子的相关图中,左、右壳核和丘脑-运动连接在单频带 3.3mm 协议中最高。在相关矩阵中,MB 4、6 和 8 比其他采集(包括带和不带时间滤波)具有更多的显著相关性。我们建议在基于种子的皮质下分析中使用单频带 3.3mm,而 MB 4 为同时分析基于种子的相关图和连接矩阵的研究提供了合理的平衡。在包括对大型数据集进行二次分析的多频带研究中,我们建议报告效应大小或检验统计量,而不是相关性。如果报告相关性,则应使用时间滤波(或其他去除热噪声的方法)。埃默里多频带数据集可在 OpenNeuro 上获得。

相似文献

6
On the detection of high frequency correlations in resting state fMRI.在静息态 fMRI 中检测高频相关性。
Neuroimage. 2018 Jan 1;164:202-213. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.059. Epub 2017 Feb 3.

引用本文的文献

3
parcellation of the human spinal cord functional architecture.人类脊髓功能结构的分区
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024 Jan 11;2. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00059. eCollection 2024.
10
Brain network correlates of affective symptoms in aMCI.轻度认知障碍中情感症状的脑网络关联
Aging Brain. 2024 Oct 14;6:100126. doi: 10.1016/j.nbas.2024.100126. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

5
Correction of respiratory artifacts in MRI head motion estimates.校正 MRI 头部运动估计中的呼吸伪影。
Neuroimage. 2020 Mar;208:116400. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116400. Epub 2019 Nov 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验