Bonekamp Gerbrich, Schoon Mira A, Hiemstra Sipke-Joost, Hoving-Bolink Rita A H, Ten Napel Jan, Windig Jack J
Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University and Research, 6700 AH Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University and Research, 6700 AH Wageningen, the Netherlands; Centre for Genetic resources the Netherlands, Wageningen University and Research, 6700 AH Wageningen, the Netherlands.
J Dairy Sci. 2025 Jun;108(6):6130-6150. doi: 10.3168/jds.2024-25802. Epub 2025 Apr 15.
It has been suggested that local breeds might be more suited for agroecological systems compared with high-input, high-output breeds, such as the Holstein dairy breed. We investigated whether 3 native Dutch dual-purpose (NLdp) cattle breeds and the Holstein perform differently across herd environments. We compared 490 farms in the Netherlands that had breed fractions summing up to the equivalent of at least 10 purebred NLdp cows with neighboring farms with predominantly Holstein. Herd environment was characterized by 49 farm characteristics derived from national databases and included average animal performance, feed used, soil type, farm size, and use of concentrates and fertilizer. All traits were summarized into 4 principal component axes interpreted as production (levels and intensity), soil and feed use, agroecological practices, and level of crossbreeding. Most NLdp farms had a mixture of breeds or had predominantly crossbreds. Overlap between Holstein farms and NLdp farms was large, but NLdp farms had on average a lower production, were more locally concentrated, more agroecological and applied more crossbreeding. The NLdp breeds varied in this respect, with farms with Groningen White Headed (GWH) being present on more agroecological farms, Meuse Rhine Yssel cattle (MRY) more on farms on sandy soils with maize, and GWH and Dutch Friesian more on grass-based farms on peat and clay. For all traits, we observed a considerable breed by environment interaction, although Holstein had consistently higher milk production and MRY consistently higher protein content across all environments. Holstein had higher milk production on production-intensive farms compared with NLdp breeds, but NLdp breeds tended to have better performance for calving interval, SCC, and milk solids, and consequently outperformed Holstein in some environments. The NLdp cows did not consistently perform better than Holstein in agroecological herd environments. Nevertheless, there are opportunities for NLdp breeds in agroecological and other farm systems, depending on which traits are important.
有人认为,与高投入、高产出的品种(如荷斯坦奶牛品种)相比,地方品种可能更适合农业生态系统。我们调查了3个荷兰本土兼用型(NLdp)牛品种和荷斯坦牛在不同畜群环境中的表现是否不同。我们比较了荷兰490个农场,这些农场的品种比例加起来相当于至少10头纯种NLdp奶牛,与邻近的主要是荷斯坦牛的农场进行比较。畜群环境由49个来自国家数据库的农场特征来表征,包括平均动物生产性能、使用的饲料、土壤类型、农场规模以及精饲料和肥料的使用情况。所有性状被汇总为4个主成分轴,分别解释为生产(水平和强度)、土壤和饲料利用、农业生态实践以及杂交水平。大多数NLdp农场有品种混合或主要是杂交品种。荷斯坦农场和NLdp农场之间的重叠很大,但NLdp农场平均产量较低,更集中在当地,更具农业生态性且采用更多杂交。NLdp品种在这方面存在差异,格罗宁根白头牛(GWH)所在的农场更多是农业生态农场,默兹莱茵艾瑟尔牛(MRY)更多在种植玉米的沙质土壤农场,GWH和荷兰弗里西亚牛更多在泥炭土和粘土上以草为基础的农场。对于所有性状,我们观察到显著的品种与环境互作,尽管荷斯坦牛在所有环境中牛奶产量一直较高,而MRY蛋白质含量一直较高。与NLdp品种相比,荷斯坦牛在生产密集型农场牛奶产量更高,但NLdp品种在产犊间隔、体细胞计数和乳固体方面往往表现更好,因此在某些环境中优于荷斯坦牛。在农业生态畜群环境中,NLdp奶牛并不总是比荷斯坦牛表现更好。然而,根据哪些性状重要,NLdp品种在农业生态和其他农场系统中存在机会。