• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一份评估基于问题的学习课程中整合程度的问卷的心理测量学特性。

Psychometric properties of a questionnaire assessing the extent of integration in a problem-based learning curriculum.

作者信息

Abu-Hijleh Marwan F, Kassab Salah Eldin, Allouch Soumaya, Ali Raja Mahamade, Al-Wattary Noor, Nomikos Michail, Salem Abdel Halim, Shehata Mohamed H, Sequeira Reginald P

机构信息

Department of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, P.O. Box: 2713, Doha, Qatar.

College of Medicine, Gulf Medical University, P.O. Box: 4184, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 17;25(1):561. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07165-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-025-07165-z
PMID:40247313
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12007221/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Integrated curricula reinforce student learning and retention of relevant knowledge. At Qatar University and Arabian Gulf University medical colleges, Problem-Based Learning (PBL) is the principal teaching and learning strategy to implement integrated multidisciplinary system-based curriculum. In addition, other initiatives include integrated assessment, logical organization of teaching and learning methods, as well as combined faculty effort in curriculum planning and delivery. This multicenter study aims to develop and validate a questionnaire for measuring the extent of medical curriculum integration in PBL programs.

METHODS

Following an extensive literature review, the content validity of a questionnaire was tested through focus group discussion with subject matter experts (n = 20), followed by pilot testing with medical students (n = 20). The content-validated questionnaire (31 items) was distributed to students in the two colleges. To examine the construct validity and construct reliability of the questionnaire, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted with 330 students followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on 579 students.

RESULTS

EFA supported a four-factor structure of the questionnaire which explained 62% of the variance; however, four items were deleted because of low factor loading (< 0.5) or cross-loading on multiple factors. Further CFA also supported the four-factor structure. Another three items were removed due to high modification indices. The most parsimonious model consisted of 24 items with good fitness indices (χ = 512.23, df = 236, χ /df = 2.17, CFI = 0.97, TLI = 0.97, RMSEA = 0.04, SRMR = 0.031, and AIC = 688.22). The four factors were: Planned Curriculum (3 items), Delivered Curriculum (10 items), Assessed Curriculum (4 items) and Learned Curriculum (7 items). The factor loadings of the items ranged from 0.61 to 0.84 with strong correlations between the four latent factors (constructs). The construct reliability of the total questionnaire was 0.97 and the four factors were between 0.94 and 0.97. In addition, there were strong significant correlations between curriculum integration scores and student satisfaction with the curriculum.

CONCLUSIONS

The developed questionnaire exhibits good evidence of construct validity and reliability. Further studies required to test the validity of this questionnaire in other settings.

摘要

背景

整合课程能够加强学生对相关知识的学习与记忆。在卡塔尔大学和海湾大学医学院,基于问题的学习(PBL)是实施基于多学科系统整合课程的主要教学策略。此外,其他举措还包括整合评估、教学方法的合理组织,以及教师在课程规划与授课方面的共同努力。这项多中心研究旨在开发并验证一份用于衡量PBL项目中医学课程整合程度的问卷。

方法

在广泛的文献综述之后,通过与20位主题专家进行焦点小组讨论来测试问卷的内容效度,随后对20名医学生进行预测试。经过内容效度验证的问卷(31个项目)被分发给两所学院的学生。为检验问卷的结构效度和结构信度,对330名学生进行探索性因子分析(EFA),随后对579名学生进行验证性因子分析(CFA)。

结果

探索性因子分析支持问卷的四因素结构,该结构解释了62%的方差变异;然而,由于因子载荷较低(<0.5)或在多个因子上存在交叉载荷,删除了4个项目。进一步的验证性因子分析也支持四因素结构。由于修正指标较高,又删除了另外3个项目。最精简的模型由24个项目组成,具有良好的拟合指标(χ=512.23,df=236,χ/df=2.17,CFI=0.97,TLI=0.97,RMSEA=0.04,SRMR=0.031,AIC=688.22)。这四个因素分别是:计划课程(3个项目)、实施课程(10个项目)、评估课程(4个项目)和所学课程(7个项目)。各项目的因子载荷范围为0.61至0.84,四个潜在因子(结构)之间具有很强的相关性。问卷总体的结构信度为0.97,四个因素的信度在0.94至0.97之间。此外,课程整合得分与学生对课程的满意度之间存在很强的显著相关性。

结论

所开发的问卷具有良好的结构效度和信度证据。需要进一步研究以检验该问卷在其他环境中的效度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dad5/12007221/f14c59d1b058/12909_2025_7165_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dad5/12007221/f14c59d1b058/12909_2025_7165_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dad5/12007221/f14c59d1b058/12909_2025_7165_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of a questionnaire assessing the extent of integration in a problem-based learning curriculum.一份评估基于问题的学习课程中整合程度的问卷的心理测量学特性。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 17;25(1):561. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07165-z.
2
Measuring sociocultural engagement of health professions education students: a psychometric study.测量健康职业教育学生的社会文化参与度:一项心理测量学研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 23;24(1):567. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05566-0.
3
Construct validity of a questionnaire for measuring student engagement in problem-based learning tutorials.用于测量基于问题的学习辅导中学生参与度的问卷的建构效度。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Nov 7;23(1):844. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04820-1.
4
Development and psychometric testing of the Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices (KAP) questionnaire among student Tuberculosis (TB) Patients (STBP-KAPQ) in China.中国学生结核病患者(STBP)知识、态度和实践(KAP)问卷的编制及心理测量学检验。
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 May 8;18(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3122-9.
5
Psychometric properties of the newly developed self-report environmental determinants of health questionnaire (EDH-Q): development and validation.新开发的自我报告健康环境决定因素问卷(EDH-Q)的心理测量学特性:编制与验证。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Aug 13;12(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01782-x.
6
Development and Validation of a Chinese Version of a School-to-Work Transition Anxiety Scale for Healthcare Students.开发和验证中文版医学生从学校到工作过渡焦虑量表。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 19;18(14):7658. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147658.
7
Measuring medical students' professional competencies in a problem-based curriculum: a reliability study.基于问题的课程中测量医学生专业能力:一项可靠性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 May 21;19(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1594-y.
8
The effectiveness of a structured validated questionnaire to assess student perception with virtual pharmacy simulation in pharmacy practice experiential education.评估药学实践体验式教育中虚拟药房模拟学生感知的结构化验证问卷的有效性。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 21;19(11):e0314117. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314117. eCollection 2024.
9
Questionnaire development and validity to measure sexual intention among youth in Malaysia.马来西亚青少年性意向测量问卷的编制与效度研究
BMC Public Health. 2017 Feb 2;17(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3949-1.
10
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Tools for measuring curriculum integration in health professions' education: a systematic review.测量健康职业教育课程整合的工具:系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jun 6;24(1):635. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05618-5.
2
Construct validity of a questionnaire for measuring student engagement in problem-based learning tutorials.用于测量基于问题的学习辅导中学生参与度的问卷的建构效度。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Nov 7;23(1):844. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04820-1.
3
Evaluating dental students' perspectives on the concurrent teaching of didactic and case-based courses.
评估牙科学生对理论课程和案例课程同步教学的看法。
J Dent Educ. 2022 Dec;86(12):1643-1652. doi: 10.1002/jdd.13081. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
4
Level of integration in current undergraduate curricula of two private-sector medical colleges in Karachi.卡拉奇两所私立医学院校当前本科课程中的整合水平。
Can Med Educ J. 2022 Jul 6;13(3):84-90. doi: 10.36834/cmej.73910. eCollection 2022 Jul.
5
Seeing is Believing: Inclusion of Biomedical Scientist Educators as Observers on Clinical Rounds.眼见为实:将生物医学科学家教育工作者纳入临床查房观察员
Med Sci Educ. 2022 Apr 18;32(3):607-609. doi: 10.1007/s40670-022-01546-5. eCollection 2022 Jun.
6
Probing in the complexities of the integrated undergraduate medical curriculum: A qualitative exploratory study.探究综合性本科医学课程的复杂性:一项定性探索性研究。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2022 Mar;72(3):452-456. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.1348.
7
A Tool for Evaluating Session-Level Integration in Medical Education.一种评估医学教育中课程层面整合的工具。
Med Sci Educ. 2021 Apr 2;31(2):647-654. doi: 10.1007/s40670-021-01241-x. eCollection 2021 Apr.
8
Perception of Students and Faculty on Problem Based Learning in Proficiency Certificate Level Nursing Program.学生和教师对护理专业资格证书水平的基于问题的学习的看法。
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2021 Jan 22;18(4):779-784. doi: 10.33314/jnhrc.v18i4.2667.
9
Integration in Medical Education.医学教育中的整合
Indian Pediatr. 2020 Sep 15;57(9):842-847.
10
Measuring medical students' professional competencies in a problem-based curriculum: a reliability study.基于问题的课程中测量医学生专业能力:一项可靠性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 May 21;19(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1594-y.