Nietsch Katrina, Yendluri Avanish, Corvi John J, Chiang Joshua J, Hahn Alexander K, Namiri Nikan K, Megafu Michael N, Moucha Calin S, Einhorn Thomas A, Parisien Robert L
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Pl, New York, NY, USA.
Perelman School of Medicine, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
J Orthop. 2025 Mar 26;63:148-156. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2025.03.013. eCollection 2025 May.
There is no universally-utilized classification system for avascular necrosis of the femoral head (AVNFH), a debilitating condition that arises due to impaired blood supply resulting in cortical collapse. AVNFH may require early intervention to prevent irreversible damage leading to total hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to assess the variability in classification, management, and outcomes reported in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to AVNFH.
PubMed, Embase, and Medline were queried for RCTs on the treatment of AVNFH (2010-2023). The number of patients, number of femoral heads, minimum follow-up, AVNFH classification system, treatment interventions, and outcome measures were extracted. Variability in classification, management approach, and reporting of outcomes was evaluated.
A total of 30 RCTs met inclusion criteria, encompassing 1891 total patients. The mean number of patients in each study was 63 (SD = 41), with a mean minimum follow-up of 30 months (SD = 17). The Association Research Circulation Osseous classification system was utilized in 63 % (n = 19) of studies, Ficat and Arlet in 20 % (n = 6) of studies, Steinberg in 10 % (n = 3), Mitchell in 3 % (n = 1), and the China-Japan Friendship Hospital classifications in 3 % (n = 1). There were 61 treatment interventions, stratified into nine categories. Radiographic imaging was most commonly used to evaluate patients at follow-up.
There are a variety of classification systems, treatments, and outcome measures utilized in the literature to categorize and quantify AVNFH. The utilization of a universally-accepted classification system and standardized outcome reporting may help to ensure reproducibility and accuracy given a continued lack of consensus.
股骨头缺血性坏死(AVNFH)是一种因血液供应受损导致皮质塌陷的致残性疾病,目前尚无普遍适用的分类系统。AVNFH可能需要早期干预以防止不可逆转的损害,从而避免全髋关节置换术。本研究的目的是评估与AVNFH相关的随机对照试验(RCT)中报告的分类、管理和结果的变异性。
检索PubMed、Embase和Medline数据库中关于AVNFH治疗的RCT(2010 - 2023年)。提取患者数量、股骨头数量、最短随访时间、AVNFH分类系统、治疗干预措施和结局指标。评估分类、管理方法和结局报告的变异性。
共有30项RCT符合纳入标准,涉及1891名患者。每项研究的平均患者数量为63名(标准差 = 41),平均最短随访时间为30个月(标准差 = 17)。63%(n = 19)的研究使用了骨循环研究协会分类系统,20%(n = 6)的研究使用了菲卡(Ficat)和阿莱特(Arlet)分类系统,10%(n = 3)的研究使用了斯坦伯格(Steinberg)分类系统,3%(n = 1)的研究使用了米切尔(Mitchell)分类系统,3%(n = 1)的研究使用了中日友好医院分类系统。有61种治疗干预措施,分为九类。随访时最常用影像学检查来评估患者。
文献中使用了多种分类系统、治疗方法和结局指标来对AVNFH进行分类和量化。鉴于目前仍缺乏共识,采用普遍接受的分类系统和标准化的结局报告可能有助于确保研究的可重复性和准确性。