Reubenson Alan, Ng Leo, Lawton Vidya, Nahon Irmina, Terry Rebecca, Baldwin Claire, Blackford Julia, Bond Alex, Corrigan Rosemary, Dalton Megan, Dario Amabile Borges, Donovan Michael, Dunwoodie Ruth, Dwyer Genevieve M, Forbes Roma, Francis-Cracknell Alison, Gill Janelle, Hams Andrea, Jones Anne, Jones Taryn, Judd Belinda, Kennedy Ewan, Morgan Prue, Palmer Tanya, Peiris Casey, Taylor Carolyn, Virtue Debra, Zischke Cherie, Gucciardi Daniel F
Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 18;20(4):e0321397. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321397. eCollection 2025.
The Assessment of Physiotherapy Practice (APP) is a 20-item assessment instrument used to assess entry-level physiotherapy practice in Australia, New Zealand and other international locations. Initial APP reliability and validity evidence supported a unidimensional or single latent factor as the best representation of entry-level physiotherapy practice performance. However, there remains inconsistency in how the APP is interpreted and operationalised across Australian and New Zealand universities offering entry-level physiotherapy programs. In essence, the presumption that the psychometric integrity of the APP generalises across people, time, and contexts remains largely untested. This multi-site, archival replication study utilised APP assessment data from 8,979 clinical placement assessments, across 19 Australian and New Zealand universities, graduating entry-level physiotherapy students (n=1865) in 2019. Structural representation of APP scores were examined via confirmatory factor analysis and penalised structural equation models. Factor analyses indicated a 2-factor representation, with four items (1-4) for the professional dimension and 16 items (5-20) for the clinical dimension, is the best approximation of entry-level physiotherapy performance. Measurement invariance analyses supported the robustness of this 2-factor representation over time and across diverse practice areas in both penultimate and final years of study. The findings provide strong evidence for the psychometric integrity of the APP, and the 2-factor alternative interpretation and operationalisation is recommended. To meet entry-level standards students should be assessed as competent across both professional and clinical dimensions of physiotherapy practice.
物理治疗实践评估(APP)是一种包含20个项目的评估工具,用于评估澳大利亚、新西兰及其他国际地区的入门级物理治疗实践。最初的APP信效度证据支持单维或单一潜在因素作为入门级物理治疗实践表现的最佳表征。然而,在澳大利亚和新西兰提供入门级物理治疗课程的大学中,对APP的解释和操作方式仍存在不一致之处。从本质上讲,APP的心理测量完整性在不同人群、时间和情境中具有普遍性这一假设在很大程度上仍未得到检验。这项多地点、档案复制研究利用了来自澳大利亚和新西兰19所大学的8979次临床实习评估的APP评估数据,这些数据来自2019年毕业的入门级物理治疗专业学生(n = 1865)。通过验证性因素分析和惩罚性结构方程模型对APP分数的结构表征进行了检验。因素分析表明,二维表征是入门级物理治疗表现的最佳近似,其中专业维度有4个项目(1 - 4),临床维度有16个项目(5 - 20)。测量不变性分析支持了这种二维表现在学习的倒数第二年和最后一年随时间推移以及在不同实践领域的稳健性。研究结果为APP的心理测量完整性提供了有力证据,建议采用二维替代解释和操作方式。为达到入门级标准,应评估学生在物理治疗实践的专业和临床维度上均具备能力。