• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Allied Health Professions Accreditation Standards for Work Integrated Learning: A Document Analysis.医疗相关专业工作整合学习认证标准:文件分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jul 31;20(15):6478. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20156478.
2
Designing near-peer mentoring for work integrated learning outcomes: a systematic review.设计工作整合学习成果的近邻导师制:系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Aug 28;24(1):937. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05900-6.
3
Creating a Collaborative Care Curriculum Framework.创建一个协作护理课程框架。
Clin Teach. 2019 Apr;16(2):120-124. doi: 10.1111/tct.12796. Epub 2018 May 23.
4
Interprofessional education-relevant accreditation standards in Canada: a comparative document analysis.加拿大与跨专业教育相关的认证标准:一份比较性文件分析
Hum Resour Health. 2021 May 13;19(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12960-021-00611-1.
5
Consensus-based statements for assessing clinical competency in podiatry-related work integrated learning.基于共识的评估足病相关工作综合学习临床能力的陈述。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2023 Jul 19;16(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13047-023-00639-7.
6
Can educational accreditation drive interdisciplinary learning in the health professions?教育认证能否推动卫生专业的跨学科学习?
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1996 Mar;22(3):213-22. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30224-3.
7
The identification of requirements for competency development during work-integrated learning in healthcare education.工作整合学习中医疗教育的能力发展需求的确定。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Apr 22;24(1):427. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05428-9.
8
The Scope of Social Mission Content in Health Professions Education Accreditation Standards.卫生专业教育认证标准中社会使命内容的范围
Acad Med. 2022 Jan 1;97(1):111-120. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004437.
9
Regulation of the global orthotist/prosthetist workforce, and what we might learn from allied health professions with international-level regulatory support: a narrative review.全球矫形师/假肢师劳动力的监管,以及我们可能从具有国际水平监管支持的相关健康职业中学到的东西:叙述性评论。
Hum Resour Health. 2021 Jul 15;19(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12960-021-00625-9.
10
Outcomes, accreditation, interprofessional education, and the Tower of Babel.成果、认证、跨专业教育与巴别塔
J Interprof Care. 2019 Nov-Dec;33(6):805-808. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2019.1593119. Epub 2019 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Aged-Care Rural Clinical Placements on Health Student Self-Efficacy: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation.老年护理农村临床实习对健康专业学生自我效能的影响:一项混合方法评估。
Aust J Rural Health. 2025 Aug;33(4):e70083. doi: 10.1111/ajr.70083.
2
What do Australian university staff perceive are the features of high-quality rural health student placements? A sequential explanatory study.澳大利亚大学工作人员认为高质量农村卫生专业学生实习的特点是什么?一项序贯解释性研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 25;15(6):e098381. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098381.
3
The assessment of physiotherapy practice is a robust measure of entry-level physiotherapy standards: Reliability and validity evidence from a large, representative sample.物理治疗实践评估是对入门级物理治疗标准的有力衡量:来自大型代表性样本的信度和效度证据。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 18;20(4):e0321397. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321397. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Reimagining Preparedness of Health Professional Graduates Through Stewardship.通过管理重新构想卫生专业毕业生的准备情况。
Teach Learn Med. 2023 Aug-Sep;35(4):486-495. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2022.2148108. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
2
Using document analysis to revise competency frameworks: Perspectives from the revision of competency standards for dietitians.运用文献分析修订能力框架:营养师能力标准修订的视角
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 4;9:900636. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.900636. eCollection 2022.
3
Supporting health professional educators in the workplace: A scoping review.支持工作场所中的健康专业教育者:范围综述。
Med Teach. 2023 Jan;45(1):49-57. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2102467. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
4
Exploring professional identity in rehabilitation professions: a scoping review.探索康复专业中的专业身份认同:范围综述。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2022 Aug;27(3):793-815. doi: 10.1007/s10459-022-10103-z. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
5
A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149.质性研究中反思性的实用指南:AMEE指南第149号
Med Teach. 2022 Apr 7:1-11. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287.
6
A Six-Step Model for Developing Competency Frameworks in the Healthcare Professions.医疗保健行业能力框架开发的六步模型。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Dec 14;8:789828. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.789828. eCollection 2021.
7
Professionalism, Resilience and Reflective Thinking: How Do These Influence Occupational Therapy Student Fieldwork Outcomes?专业精神、适应力和反思思维:它们如何影响职业治疗学生的实习成果?
Occup Ther Health Care. 2022 Oct;36(4):327-352. doi: 10.1080/07380577.2021.1978606. Epub 2021 Sep 26.
8
Not too little, not too much: supervisor perceptions of work-readiness of speech-language pathology graduates.不过多也不过少:督导对言语治疗毕业生工作准备情况的看法。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2022 Mar;27(1):87-106. doi: 10.1007/s10459-021-10073-8. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
9
New ways of seeing: supplementing existing competency framework development guidelines with systems thinking.新视角:用系统思维补充现有能力框架开发指南。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2021 Oct;26(4):1355-1371. doi: 10.1007/s10459-021-10054-x. Epub 2021 May 18.
10
Shaping our worldviews: a conversation about and of theory.塑造我们的世界观:关于理论的对话。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2021 Mar;26(1):339-345. doi: 10.1007/s10459-021-10033-2. Epub 2021 Feb 11.

医疗相关专业工作整合学习认证标准:文件分析。

Allied Health Professions Accreditation Standards for Work Integrated Learning: A Document Analysis.

机构信息

Curtin School of Allied Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia.

School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jul 31;20(15):6478. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20156478.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20156478
PMID:37569019
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10418477/
Abstract

A key role of allied health (AH) professional regulatory and professional bodies is to ensure that AH education programs provide work-integrated learning (WIL) opportunities for students. The requirements are outlined via the respective profession's educational accreditation standards. Although a significant component of the AH professional degrees, researchers have not explored how standards specific to WIL are developed, nor how WIL might be conceptualised through the standards. This study explored how WIL is conceptualised through comparing the WIL education standards across Australian AH professions. Using a non-experimental explanatory mixed-methods research design, a document analysis of Australian education program accreditation standards (and associated documents) for 15 AH professions was undertaken. Data analysis included inductive textual and thematic analyses to compare AH professionals' conceptualisation of WIL. This study found a high degree of variation in how AH professions describe WIL. While there was a common requirement for students to demonstrate competency in WIL, requirements for WIL quantity, assessment and supervision varied. Four key themes were identified regarding the contribution of WIL to curriculum and student learning: (1) the relationship between WIL and the program curriculum; (2) WIL as a learning process; (3) learning from diverse WIL contexts; and (4) developing competence through WIL. Overall, the diversity in the standards reflected differing understandings of what WIL is. Thus, in the absence of frameworks for designing accreditation standards, the risk is that some AH professions will continue to perpetuate the myth that the primary purpose of WIL is to provide a bridge between theory and practice.

摘要

辅助医疗(AH)专业监管和专业机构的一个关键作用是确保 AH 教育计划为学生提供工作整合学习(WIL)机会。这些要求通过各自专业的教育认证标准进行概述。尽管 WIL 是 AH 专业学位的重要组成部分,但研究人员尚未探讨如何制定专门针对 WIL 的标准,也未探讨如何通过这些标准来概念化 WIL。本研究通过比较澳大利亚 AH 专业的 WIL 教育标准来探讨如何通过标准来概念化 WIL。使用非实验性解释性混合方法研究设计,对 15 个 AH 专业的澳大利亚教育计划认证标准(和相关文件)进行了文件分析。数据分析包括对 AH 专业人员对 WIL 的概念化进行归纳文本和主题分析。本研究发现,AH 专业人员对 WIL 的描述存在很大差异。虽然学生必须在 WIL 中表现出能力,但对 WIL 的数量、评估和监督的要求各不相同。关于 WIL 对课程和学生学习的贡献,确定了四个关键主题:(1)WIL 与课程计划之间的关系;(2)WIL 作为学习过程;(3)从不同的 WIL 环境中学习;(4)通过 WIL 发展能力。总体而言,标准的多样性反映了对 WIL 含义的不同理解。因此,在没有设计认证标准框架的情况下,风险是一些 AH 专业将继续延续 WIL 的主要目的是在理论和实践之间架起桥梁的神话。