Curtin School of Allied Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia.
School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jul 31;20(15):6478. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20156478.
A key role of allied health (AH) professional regulatory and professional bodies is to ensure that AH education programs provide work-integrated learning (WIL) opportunities for students. The requirements are outlined via the respective profession's educational accreditation standards. Although a significant component of the AH professional degrees, researchers have not explored how standards specific to WIL are developed, nor how WIL might be conceptualised through the standards. This study explored how WIL is conceptualised through comparing the WIL education standards across Australian AH professions. Using a non-experimental explanatory mixed-methods research design, a document analysis of Australian education program accreditation standards (and associated documents) for 15 AH professions was undertaken. Data analysis included inductive textual and thematic analyses to compare AH professionals' conceptualisation of WIL. This study found a high degree of variation in how AH professions describe WIL. While there was a common requirement for students to demonstrate competency in WIL, requirements for WIL quantity, assessment and supervision varied. Four key themes were identified regarding the contribution of WIL to curriculum and student learning: (1) the relationship between WIL and the program curriculum; (2) WIL as a learning process; (3) learning from diverse WIL contexts; and (4) developing competence through WIL. Overall, the diversity in the standards reflected differing understandings of what WIL is. Thus, in the absence of frameworks for designing accreditation standards, the risk is that some AH professions will continue to perpetuate the myth that the primary purpose of WIL is to provide a bridge between theory and practice.
辅助医疗(AH)专业监管和专业机构的一个关键作用是确保 AH 教育计划为学生提供工作整合学习(WIL)机会。这些要求通过各自专业的教育认证标准进行概述。尽管 WIL 是 AH 专业学位的重要组成部分,但研究人员尚未探讨如何制定专门针对 WIL 的标准,也未探讨如何通过这些标准来概念化 WIL。本研究通过比较澳大利亚 AH 专业的 WIL 教育标准来探讨如何通过标准来概念化 WIL。使用非实验性解释性混合方法研究设计,对 15 个 AH 专业的澳大利亚教育计划认证标准(和相关文件)进行了文件分析。数据分析包括对 AH 专业人员对 WIL 的概念化进行归纳文本和主题分析。本研究发现,AH 专业人员对 WIL 的描述存在很大差异。虽然学生必须在 WIL 中表现出能力,但对 WIL 的数量、评估和监督的要求各不相同。关于 WIL 对课程和学生学习的贡献,确定了四个关键主题:(1)WIL 与课程计划之间的关系;(2)WIL 作为学习过程;(3)从不同的 WIL 环境中学习;(4)通过 WIL 发展能力。总体而言,标准的多样性反映了对 WIL 含义的不同理解。因此,在没有设计认证标准框架的情况下,风险是一些 AH 专业将继续延续 WIL 的主要目的是在理论和实践之间架起桥梁的神话。