• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估以芝麻壳作为部分水泥和沙子替代品的水泥砂浆的力学性能和耐久性。

Evaluating the mechanical performance and durability of cement mortars incorporating sesame shells as partial cement and sand replacement.

作者信息

Al-Luhybi Ashtar S, Ali Taghreed Khaleefa Mohammed, Qader Diyar N, Ali Mujahid, Maureira-Carsalade Nelson, Parra Pablo Fernando, Avudaiappan Siva

机构信息

Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq.

Department of Architecture Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Koya University, Danielle Mitterrand Boulevard, Koya KOY45, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21875. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07753-5.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-07753-5
PMID:40596238
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12215421/
Abstract

This study examines the mechanical and durability behaviors of cement mortar containing sesame shells (SS) as partial substitutes of cement and sand with regard to sustainable construction using an agricultural by-product. Three types of SS-raw powder, vinegar-treated powder and vinegar-thermal-treated powder (250 °C)-were used as the fine aggregate replacements at 1%, 2%, and 3% by weight. Mechanical performances (compressive strength, dry density) and durability (UPV, water absorption, water porosity, workability) of the composites were investigated in a systematic manner. Results show that substituting sand with SS causes a significant decrease in the compressive strength (up to 54% at 3%of replacement) and the increase in porosity and water absorption that compromised the durability. On the contrary, the use of SS, particularly the treated one, caused strength decrease (up to 42.3%) with improved durability properties specifically lower porosity (8.84%) and lower water absorption (1.7%). UPV of all mixes were above 4.2 km/s representing good internal consistency. Error bars were included in all test figures with replicate specimens to properly demonstrate the variation and to reinforce the reliability of the data. The findings suggest that the optimal use of SS is as a 3% cement replacement in treated form, offering an environmentally friendly alternative with acceptable mechanical performance and significantly improved durability.

摘要

本研究探讨了在可持续建筑中使用农业副产品芝麻壳(SS)作为水泥和沙子的部分替代品时,水泥砂浆的力学性能和耐久性。使用了三种类型的SS——生粉末、经醋处理的粉末和经醋热处理的粉末(250°C)——以1%、2%和3%的重量替代细集料。系统地研究了复合材料的力学性能(抗压强度、干密度)和耐久性(超声波脉冲速度、吸水率、孔隙率、工作性)。结果表明,用SS替代沙子会导致抗压强度显著降低(在3%替代率时高达54%),孔隙率和吸水率增加,从而损害耐久性。相反,使用SS,特别是经过处理的SS,会导致强度降低(高达42.3%),但耐久性得到改善,特别是孔隙率更低(8.84%)和吸水率更低(1.7%)。所有混合料的超声波脉冲速度均高于4.2 km/s,表明内部一致性良好。所有测试数据图中均包含误差线以及重复试样,以正确展示变化情况并增强数据的可靠性。研究结果表明,SS的最佳使用方式是以3%的比例替代经处理的水泥,这提供了一种具有可接受力学性能且耐久性显著提高的环保替代品。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/6cf8e9844067/41598_2025_7753_Fig35_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/7576756dd150/41598_2025_7753_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/cab610092e6e/41598_2025_7753_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/3790da6ab1c3/41598_2025_7753_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/88533f76191a/41598_2025_7753_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/5a73f6612ad8/41598_2025_7753_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/c7435d9f1dd2/41598_2025_7753_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/6c36c50ebf9e/41598_2025_7753_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/4d136bbe0c7d/41598_2025_7753_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/e7fc5e02f3ce/41598_2025_7753_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/81cf2ea327ad/41598_2025_7753_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/eb0965660790/41598_2025_7753_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/39b0dde9fb8d/41598_2025_7753_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/8e9a9c5b902b/41598_2025_7753_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/3b8578496f74/41598_2025_7753_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/604156b1dfdf/41598_2025_7753_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/b931b12db889/41598_2025_7753_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/a3bbd46cb90d/41598_2025_7753_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/9ceef021c1c4/41598_2025_7753_Fig18_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/ebfbadb5837a/41598_2025_7753_Fig19_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/db1c3caf1a3c/41598_2025_7753_Fig20_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/9becc71c7424/41598_2025_7753_Fig21_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/a96836f9ce0c/41598_2025_7753_Fig22_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/70f1cc1357f3/41598_2025_7753_Fig23_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/58fb86fd605f/41598_2025_7753_Fig24_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/c690b4d84698/41598_2025_7753_Fig25_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/f56d91371450/41598_2025_7753_Fig26_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/ee4f103c85dc/41598_2025_7753_Fig27_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/fb934545889b/41598_2025_7753_Fig28_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/7ef930caefbf/41598_2025_7753_Fig29_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/7cd473beb415/41598_2025_7753_Fig30_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/c143aa49badd/41598_2025_7753_Fig31_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/f55e7bc64819/41598_2025_7753_Fig32_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/3e5df440e46c/41598_2025_7753_Fig33_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/f0170b9b1de2/41598_2025_7753_Fig34_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/6cf8e9844067/41598_2025_7753_Fig35_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/7576756dd150/41598_2025_7753_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/cab610092e6e/41598_2025_7753_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/3790da6ab1c3/41598_2025_7753_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/88533f76191a/41598_2025_7753_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/5a73f6612ad8/41598_2025_7753_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/c7435d9f1dd2/41598_2025_7753_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/6c36c50ebf9e/41598_2025_7753_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/4d136bbe0c7d/41598_2025_7753_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/e7fc5e02f3ce/41598_2025_7753_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/81cf2ea327ad/41598_2025_7753_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/eb0965660790/41598_2025_7753_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/39b0dde9fb8d/41598_2025_7753_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/8e9a9c5b902b/41598_2025_7753_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/3b8578496f74/41598_2025_7753_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/604156b1dfdf/41598_2025_7753_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/b931b12db889/41598_2025_7753_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/a3bbd46cb90d/41598_2025_7753_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/9ceef021c1c4/41598_2025_7753_Fig18_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/ebfbadb5837a/41598_2025_7753_Fig19_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/db1c3caf1a3c/41598_2025_7753_Fig20_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/9becc71c7424/41598_2025_7753_Fig21_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/a96836f9ce0c/41598_2025_7753_Fig22_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/70f1cc1357f3/41598_2025_7753_Fig23_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/58fb86fd605f/41598_2025_7753_Fig24_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/c690b4d84698/41598_2025_7753_Fig25_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/f56d91371450/41598_2025_7753_Fig26_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/ee4f103c85dc/41598_2025_7753_Fig27_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/fb934545889b/41598_2025_7753_Fig28_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/7ef930caefbf/41598_2025_7753_Fig29_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/7cd473beb415/41598_2025_7753_Fig30_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/c143aa49badd/41598_2025_7753_Fig31_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/f55e7bc64819/41598_2025_7753_Fig32_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/3e5df440e46c/41598_2025_7753_Fig33_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/f0170b9b1de2/41598_2025_7753_Fig34_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba5/12215421/6cf8e9844067/41598_2025_7753_Fig35_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating the mechanical performance and durability of cement mortars incorporating sesame shells as partial cement and sand replacement.评估以芝麻壳作为部分水泥和沙子替代品的水泥砂浆的力学性能和耐久性。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21875. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07753-5.
2
Recycled Clay Brick Powder as a Dual-Function Additive: Mitigating the Alkali-Silica Reaction (ASR) and Enhancing Strength in Eco-Friendly Mortar with Hybrid Waste Glass and Clay Brick Aggregates.再生粘土砖粉作为一种双功能添加剂:缓解碱-硅酸反应(ASR)并增强含混合废玻璃和粘土砖骨料的生态友好型砂浆的强度。
Materials (Basel). 2025 Jun 16;18(12):2838. doi: 10.3390/ma18122838.
3
Assessment of strength and durability of an eco-friendly high strength lightweight concrete by incorporating treated crushed coconut shell aggregates and ground granulated blast furnace slag.通过掺入经处理的碎椰子壳骨料和磨细粒化高炉矿渣来评估一种环保型高强度轻质混凝土的强度和耐久性。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2025 Jun;32(27):16340-16360. doi: 10.1007/s11356-025-36655-2. Epub 2025 Jun 26.
4
Sustainable production of high strength fiber reinforced mortars using volcanic ash and magnetized water treatment technology.利用火山灰和磁化水处理技术可持续生产高强度纤维增强砂浆。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):20646. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06883-0.
5
Experimental investigation on partial cement replacement with binary blended bagasse ash and calcined dolomite for enhanced C-25 grade concrete performance.用二元混合甘蔗渣灰和煅烧白云石部分替代水泥以提高C-25级混凝土性能的试验研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):22844. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98019-7.
6
Effects of Water-to-Cement and Sand-to-Binder Ratio on Mechanical and Drying Shrinkage Properties of Low-Carbon Mortar Containing Biochar Aggregate.水灰比和砂胶比对含生物炭骨料低碳砂浆力学性能及干燥收缩性能的影响
Materials (Basel). 2025 Jun 11;18(12):2750. doi: 10.3390/ma18122750.
7
Chlorhexidine mouthrinse as an adjunctive treatment for gingival health.洗必泰漱口水作为牙龈健康的辅助治疗方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 31;3(3):CD008676. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008676.pub2.
8
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
9
Utilizing Saudi volcanic scoria in lightweight geopolymer for enhanced wellbore cementing.利用沙特火山矿渣制备轻质地质聚合物以增强井筒固井效果。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):20965. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06865-2.
10
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the impact of waste marble on the compressive strength of traditional concrete using machine learning.利用机器学习评估废弃大理石对传统混凝土抗压强度的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 18;15(1):13417. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98431-z.
2
Biomass energy production and its impacts on the ecological footprint: An investigation of the G7 countries.生物质能源生产及其对生态足迹的影响:对 G7 国家的调查。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Nov 15;743:140741. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140741. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
3
Agricultural Solid Waste as Source of Supplementary Cementitious Materials in Developing Countries.
农业固体废物作为发展中国家补充胶凝材料的来源。
Materials (Basel). 2019 Apr 3;12(7):1112. doi: 10.3390/ma12071112.