• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性病患者对简明语言摘要的看法:一项定性分析。

Perspectives of people with chronic illness about plain language summaries: a qualitative analysis.

作者信息

Gainey Karen Maree, McCaffery Kirsten, Muscat Danielle

机构信息

Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Corner of Parramatta and City Roads, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia.

出版信息

Health Promot Int. 2025 Mar 5;40(2). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaf044.

DOI:10.1093/heapro/daaf044
PMID:40252004
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12008741/
Abstract

People with chronic health conditions tend to look for information from a range of sources. Although information online is accessible, the quality varies and articles in scientific journals are not written for a general audience. Given this, plain language summaries (PLSs) may be a useful source of information, especially for people with chronic medical conditions. PLSs contain reliable information that is written in plain, easy-to-understand language. We investigated the health information-seeking behaviour of consumers with chronic health conditions and sought to understand what they see as important in a PLS with respect to content, design and structure, and the labels used. We conducted semi-structured focus groups and interviews with 19 participants from 6 countries, all with a chronic medical condition. Using reflexive thematic analysis, we developed four themes: (i) 'Accessing information in a competitive landscape of health information'; (ii) 'I really don't see the patient in this at all'; (iii) 'Co-design should be meaningful, not tokenistic'; and (iv) 'A way forward: Approach PLSs with creativity'. Participants highlighted the importance of PLS labels, the need for actionable content, and the recommendation to vary the reading level depending on audience needs. The results of this study suggest that PLSs produced with consumer input could elicit PLSs that better meet audience needs, focusing on information that is actionable, accessible, and written with useful content that is detailed but still respectful of the reader. Consequently, PLSs could become a more useful source of reliable information, particularly for people with chronic health conditions.

摘要

患有慢性疾病的人往往会从一系列来源寻找信息。虽然在线信息很容易获取,但质量参差不齐,而且科学期刊上的文章并非为普通读者撰写。鉴于此,简明语言摘要(PLS)可能是一个有用的信息来源,特别是对于患有慢性疾病的人。PLS包含以简单易懂的语言编写的可靠信息。我们调查了患有慢性疾病的消费者的健康信息寻求行为,并试图了解他们认为PLS在内容、设计和结构以及所使用的标签方面的重要之处。我们对来自6个国家的19名参与者进行了半结构化焦点小组讨论和访谈,他们均患有慢性疾病。通过反思性主题分析,我们形成了四个主题:(i)“在竞争激烈的健康信息环境中获取信息”;(ii)“我在这根本看不到患者的身影”;(iii)“共同设计应该是有意义的,而不是形式上的”;(iv)“前进的方向:创造性地对待PLS”。参与者强调了PLS标签的重要性、可操作内容的必要性,以及根据受众需求调整阅读水平的建议。这项研究的结果表明,在消费者参与下生成的PLS可以产生更符合受众需求的PLS,关注可操作、易获取且内容详细但仍尊重读者的有用信息。因此,PLS可能会成为一个更有用的可靠信息来源,特别是对于患有慢性疾病的人。

相似文献

1
Perspectives of people with chronic illness about plain language summaries: a qualitative analysis.慢性病患者对简明语言摘要的看法:一项定性分析。
Health Promot Int. 2025 Mar 5;40(2). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaf044.
2
What Author Instructions Do Health Journals Provide for Writing Plain Language Summaries? A Scoping Review.健康期刊对撰写通俗易懂的摘要提供了哪些作者指南?一项范围综述。
Patient. 2023 Jan;16(1):31-42. doi: 10.1007/s40271-022-00606-7. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
3
Optimizing Readability and Format of Plain Language Summaries for Medical Research Articles: Cross-sectional Survey Study.优化医学研究文章的平实语言摘要的可读性和格式:横断面调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 11;24(1):e22122. doi: 10.2196/22122.
4
Are plain language summaries published in health journals written according to instructions and health literacy principles? A systematic environmental scan.卫生期刊中发表的通俗易懂的摘要是否按照说明和健康素养原则撰写?系统环境扫描。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 27;14(11):e086464. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086464.
5
Plain Language Summaries of Clinical Trial Results: A Preliminary Study to Assess Availability of Easy-to-Understand Summaries and Approaches to Improving Public Engagement.临床试验结果的简明报告:评估易于理解的摘要的可用性和提高公众参与度的方法的初步研究。
Pharmaceut Med. 2020 Dec;34(6):401-406. doi: 10.1007/s40290-020-00359-4. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
6
Jargon and Readability in Plain Language Summaries of Health Research: Cross-Sectional Observational Study.健康研究简明语言摘要中的术语与可读性:横断面观察性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 13;27:e50862. doi: 10.2196/50862.
7
Using ChatGPT to Improve the Presentation of Plain Language Summaries of Cochrane Systematic Reviews About Oncology Interventions: Cross-Sectional Study.利用ChatGPT改善关于肿瘤学干预措施的Cochrane系统评价的简明语言总结的呈现方式:横断面研究
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Mar 19;11:e63347. doi: 10.2196/63347.
8
Conclusiveness, linguistic characteristics and readability of Cochrane plain language summaries of intervention reviews: a cross-sectional study.干预性综述 Cochrane 通俗易懂摘要的结论一致性、语言特点和易读性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Sep 10;22(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01721-7.
9
A practical 'How-To' Guide to plain language summaries (PLS) of peer-reviewed scientific publications: results of a multi-stakeholder initiative utilizing co-creation methodology.同行评审科学出版物简明语言摘要(PLS)实用“操作指南”:采用共同创作方法的多方利益相关者倡议结果
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Jun 2;8(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00358-6.
10
Linguistic analysis of plain language summaries and corresponding scientific summaries of Cochrane systematic reviews about oncology interventions.关于肿瘤学干预措施的Cochrane系统评价的简明语言摘要及相应科学摘要的语言分析。
Cancer Med. 2023 May;12(9):10950-10960. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5825. Epub 2023 Mar 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Are plain language summaries published in health journals written according to instructions and health literacy principles? A systematic environmental scan.卫生期刊中发表的通俗易懂的摘要是否按照说明和健康素养原则撰写?系统环境扫描。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 27;14(11):e086464. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086464.
2
The Importance of Lay Summaries for Improving Science Communication.医学文献的简化翻译
Ann Behav Med. 2023 Jun 30;57(7):509-510. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaad027.
3
Health literacy development is central to the prevention and control of non-communicable diseases.健康素养的发展对于非传染性疾病的预防和控制至关重要。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Dec;7(12). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010362.
4
What Author Instructions Do Health Journals Provide for Writing Plain Language Summaries? A Scoping Review.健康期刊对撰写通俗易懂的摘要提供了哪些作者指南?一项范围综述。
Patient. 2023 Jan;16(1):31-42. doi: 10.1007/s40271-022-00606-7. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
5
Plain language summaries: A systematic review of theory, guidelines and empirical research.简明语言摘要:理论、指南和实证研究的系统综述。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 6;17(6):e0268789. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268789. eCollection 2022.
6
Optimizing Readability and Format of Plain Language Summaries for Medical Research Articles: Cross-sectional Survey Study.优化医学研究文章的平实语言摘要的可读性和格式:横断面调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 11;24(1):e22122. doi: 10.2196/22122.
7
Online Health Information Seeking Behavior: A Systematic Review.在线健康信息搜索行为:一项系统综述。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Dec 16;9(12):1740. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9121740.
8
Comparison of the readability of lay summaries and scientific abstracts published in CF Research News and the Journal of Cystic Fibrosis: Recommendations for writing lay summaries.《囊性纤维化研究新闻》和《囊性纤维化杂志》上发表的通俗易懂的总结与科学摘要的可读性比较:撰写通俗易懂的总结的建议
J Cyst Fibros. 2022 Jan;21(1):e11-e14. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2021.09.009. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
9
How to use and assess qualitative research methods.如何使用和评估定性研究方法。
Neurol Res Pract. 2020 May 27;2:14. doi: 10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z. eCollection 2020.
10
A protocol for co-creating research project lay summaries with stakeholders: guideline development for Canada's AGE-WELL network.与利益相关者共同创建研究项目外行摘要的方案:加拿大“健康老龄化”网络的指南制定
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 May 8;6:22. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00197-3. eCollection 2020.