• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与利益相关者共同创建研究项目外行摘要的方案:加拿大“健康老龄化”网络的指南制定

A protocol for co-creating research project lay summaries with stakeholders: guideline development for Canada's AGE-WELL network.

作者信息

Wada Mineko, Sixsmith Judith, Harwood Gail, Cosco Theodore D, Fang Mei Lan, Sixsmith Andrew

机构信息

1Science and Technology for Aging Research (STAR) Institute, Simon Fraser University, #2800 - 515 West Hastings St., Vancouver, BC V6B 5K3 Canada.

2School of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Dundee, 11 Airlie Place, Dundee, Scotland DD1 4HJ UK.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2020 May 8;6:22. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00197-3. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1186/s40900-020-00197-3
PMID:32419955
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7210667/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Funding bodies increasingly require researchers to write lay summaries to communicate projects' real-world relevance to the public in an accessible way. However, research proposals and findings are generally not easily readable or understandable by non-specialist readers. Many researchers find writing lay summaries difficult because they typically write for fellow subject specialists or academics rather than the general public or a non-specialist audience. The primary objective of our project is to develop guidelines for researchers in Canada's AGE-WELL Network of Centres of Excellence, and ultimately various other disciplines, sectors, and institutions, to co-create lay summaries of research projects with stakeholders. To begin, we produced a protocol for co-creating a lay summary based on workshops we organized and facilitated for an AGE-WELL researcher. This paper presents the lay summary co-creation protocol that AGE-WELL researchers will be invited to use.

METHODS

Eligible participants in this project will be 24 AgeTech project researchers who are funded by the AGE-WELL network in its Core Research Program 2020. If they agree to participate in this project, we will invite them to use our protocol to co-produce a lay summary of their respective projects with stakeholders. The protocol comprises six steps: Investigate principles of writing a good lay summary, identify the target readership, identify stakeholders to collaborate with, recruit the identified stakeholders to work on a lay summary, prepare for workshop sessions, and execute the sessions. To help participants through the process, we will provide them with a guide to developing an accessible, readable research lay summary, help them make decisions, and host, and facilitate if needed, their lay summary co-creation workshops.

DISCUSSION

Public-facing research outputs, including lay summaries, are increasingly important knowledge translation strategies to promote the impact of research on real-world issues. To produce lay summaries that include information that will interest a non-specialist readership and that are written in accessible language, stakeholder engagement is key. Furthermore, both researchers and stakeholders benefit by participating in the co-creation process. We hope the protocol helps researchers collaborate with stakeholders effectively to co-produce lay summaries that meet the needs of both the public and project funders.

摘要

背景

资助机构越来越要求研究人员撰写通俗易懂的总结,以便以一种易于理解的方式向公众传达项目与现实世界的相关性。然而,非专业读者通常很难读懂研究提案和研究结果。许多研究人员发现撰写通俗易懂的总结很困难,因为他们通常是为同行专家或学者写作,而非面向普通公众或非专业受众。我们项目的主要目标是为加拿大卓越老龄化网络中心的研究人员制定指南,并最终为其他各个学科、部门和机构制定指南,以便与利益相关者共同创作研究项目的通俗易懂的总结。首先,我们根据为一位卓越老龄化网络的研究人员组织和主持的研讨会,制定了一份共同创作通俗易懂的总结的方案。本文介绍了将邀请卓越老龄化网络的研究人员使用的通俗易懂的总结共同创作方案。

方法

本项目的合格参与者将是24名由卓越老龄化网络在其2020年核心研究计划中资助的老年科技项目研究人员。如果他们同意参与本项目,我们将邀请他们使用我们的方案与利益相关者共同制作各自项目的通俗易懂的总结。该方案包括六个步骤:研究撰写优秀通俗易懂的总结的原则、确定目标读者群、确定要合作的利益相关者、招募选定的利益相关者共同撰写通俗易懂的总结、为研讨会做准备以及开展研讨会。为了帮助参与者完成整个过程,我们将为他们提供一份编写通俗易懂、易于阅读的研究总结的指南,帮助他们做出决策,并主持(如有需要还将协助)他们的通俗易懂的总结共同创作研讨会。

讨论

包括通俗易懂的总结在内的面向公众的研究成果,是促进研究对现实世界问题产生影响的越来越重要的知识转化策略。要创作包含能吸引非专业读者的信息且语言通俗易懂的总结,利益相关者的参与是关键。此外,研究人员和利益相关者都能从参与共同创作过程中受益。我们希望该方案能帮助研究人员与利益相关者有效合作,共同制作出既满足公众需求又符合项目资助者要求的通俗易懂的总结。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e62c/7210667/240998c94127/40900_2020_197_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e62c/7210667/2cea4b35b198/40900_2020_197_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e62c/7210667/e9377f332b35/40900_2020_197_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e62c/7210667/240998c94127/40900_2020_197_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e62c/7210667/2cea4b35b198/40900_2020_197_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e62c/7210667/e9377f332b35/40900_2020_197_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e62c/7210667/240998c94127/40900_2020_197_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A protocol for co-creating research project lay summaries with stakeholders: guideline development for Canada's AGE-WELL network.与利益相关者共同创建研究项目外行摘要的方案:加拿大“健康老龄化”网络的指南制定
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 May 8;6:22. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00197-3. eCollection 2020.
2
Recommended characteristics and processes for writing lay summaries of healthcare evidence: a co-created scoping review and consultation exercise.撰写医疗保健证据通俗摘要的推荐特征与流程:一项共同开展的范围界定审查与咨询活动
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Dec 20;9(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00531-5.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
"Is all the stuff about neurons necessary?" The development of lay summaries to disseminate findings from the Newcastle Cognitive Function after Stroke (COGFAST) study.“所有关于神经元的内容都有必要吗?” 中风后纽卡斯尔认知功能(COGFAST)研究结果传播的通俗总结的发展。
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Sep 11;3:18. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0066-y. eCollection 2017.
5
Supporting patient and public partners in writing lay summaries of scientific evidence in healthcare: a scoping review protocol.支持患者和公众合作伙伴撰写医疗保健科学证据的通俗摘要:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 14;12(12):e062981. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062981.
6
A practical 'How-To' Guide to plain language summaries (PLS) of peer-reviewed scientific publications: results of a multi-stakeholder initiative utilizing co-creation methodology.同行评审科学出版物简明语言摘要(PLS)实用“操作指南”:采用共同创作方法的多方利益相关者倡议结果
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Jun 2;8(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00358-6.
7
Co-creating a patient and public involvement and engagement 'how to' guide for researchers.与患者和公众共同创作一份面向研究人员的“如何做”患者和公众参与指南。
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Jun 17;6:32. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00208-3. eCollection 2020.
8
Co-creating active communities: processes and outcomes of linking public rehabilitation programs with civic engagement for active living in a Danish municipality.共同创建活跃社区:丹麦一个自治市将公共康复项目与公民参与相结合以促进积极生活的过程与成果
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Sep 14;9(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00495-6.
9
Create to Collaborate: using creative activity and participatory performance in online workshops to build collaborative research relationships.为合作而创作:在在线工作坊中运用创意活动和参与式表演来建立合作研究关系。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Dec 6;9(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00512-8.
10
Understanding Plain English summaries. A comparison of two approaches to improve the quality of Plain English summaries in research reports.理解简明英语摘要。两种提高研究报告中简明英语摘要质量方法的比较。
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Oct 9;3:17. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0064-0. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Perspectives of people with chronic illness about plain language summaries: a qualitative analysis.慢性病患者对简明语言摘要的看法:一项定性分析。
Health Promot Int. 2025 Mar 5;40(2). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaf044.
2
Developing and evaluating Compassionate Workplace Programs to promote health and wellbeing around serious illness, dying and loss in the workplace (EU-CoWork): a transdisciplinary, cross-national research project.开发并评估富有同情心的工作场所项目,以促进工作场所围绕重病、死亡和丧失亲人的健康与福祉(欧盟协同工作项目):一个跨学科、跨国研究项目。
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2024 Sep 25;18:26323524241281070. doi: 10.1177/26323524241281070. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Defining and evaluating transdisciplinary research: implications for aging and technology.界定与评估跨学科研究:对老龄化与技术的启示
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019 Aug;14(6):533-542. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1496361. Epub 2018 Oct 14.
2
"Is all the stuff about neurons necessary?" The development of lay summaries to disseminate findings from the Newcastle Cognitive Function after Stroke (COGFAST) study.“所有关于神经元的内容都有必要吗?” 中风后纽卡斯尔认知功能(COGFAST)研究结果传播的通俗总结的发展。
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Sep 11;3:18. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0066-y. eCollection 2017.
3
Dementia-friendly communities: challenges and strategies for achieving stakeholder involvement.
Examining the involvement of guardians of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Tanzania as public contributors to inform the design and conduct of the GuardiansCan project: A mixed-methods study protocol.
考察坦桑尼亚急性淋巴细胞白血病患儿监护人作为公众参与者对 GuardiansCan 项目设计和实施的影响:一项混合方法研究方案。
Cancer Med. 2024 Jul;13(14):e70034. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70034.
4
Practices and Barriers in Developing and Disseminating Plain-Language Resources Reporting Medical Research Information: A Scoping Review.开发和传播医学研究信息的简明语言资源报告的实践和障碍:范围综述。
Patient. 2024 Sep;17(5):493-518. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00700-y. Epub 2024 Jun 15.
5
Researcher and patient experiences of co-presenting research to people living with systemic sclerosis at a patient conference: content analysis of interviews.在患者会议上向系统性硬化症患者共同展示研究成果时研究者与患者的经历:访谈内容分析
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Jan 27;10(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00546-6.
6
Involving parents of children treated for cancer in Sweden as public contributors to inform the design and conduct of an evaluation of internet-administered self-help for parents of children treated for cancer: a protocol.让瑞典接受癌症治疗儿童的父母作为公众参与者,为一项针对接受癌症治疗儿童的父母的互联网自助评估的设计和实施提供信息:一项方案。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Jan 2;10(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00532-4.
7
Recommended characteristics and processes for writing lay summaries of healthcare evidence: a co-created scoping review and consultation exercise.撰写医疗保健证据通俗摘要的推荐特征与流程:一项共同开展的范围界定审查与咨询活动
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Dec 20;9(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00531-5.
8
Attitudes to the use of animals in biomedical research: Effects of stigma and selected research project summaries.生物医学研究中使用动物的态度:污名化的影响和选定的研究项目摘要。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 18;18(8):e0290232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290232. eCollection 2023.
9
Supporting patient and public partners in writing lay summaries of scientific evidence in healthcare: a scoping review protocol.支持患者和公众合作伙伴撰写医疗保健科学证据的通俗摘要:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 14;12(12):e062981. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062981.
10
Guidelines to Establish an Equitable Mobile Health Ecosystem.建立公平的移动医疗生态系统指南。
Psychiatr Serv. 2023 Apr 1;74(4):393-400. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202200011. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
关爱痴呆症患者的社区:实现利益相关者参与的挑战与策略
Health Soc Care Community. 2017 May;25(3):858-867. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12371. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
4
Principles for fostering the transdisciplinary development of assistive technologies.促进辅助技术跨学科发展的原则。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017 Jul;12(5):480-490. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2016.1151953. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
5
Opinion: Lay summaries needed to enhance science communication.观点:需要通俗易懂的总结来加强科学传播。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Mar 24;112(12):3585-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1500882112.
6
Lay abstracts and summaries: writing advice for scientists.非专业摘要与总结:给科学家的写作建议。
J Cancer Educ. 2014 Sep;29(3):577-9. doi: 10.1007/s13187-013-0570-1.
7
The ecology of team science: understanding contextual influences on transdisciplinary collaboration.团队科学的生态学:理解跨学科合作的情境影响
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S96-115. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.003.
8
Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research: a literature review.跨学科和多学科研究的评估:一项文献综述。
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S116-23. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.010.
9
Lay perspectives: advantages for health research.外行视角:对健康研究的益处
BMJ. 1998 Feb 7;316(7129):463-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7129.463.