Morato-Espino Paulin Grace, Ramos Jose Ma Rafael, Gomez Ivan Neil
University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines
University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines.
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 19;15(4):e093352. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093352.
This systematic review aims to summarise and assess the measurement properties of existing instruments for measuring child well-being.
A systematic review of measurement properties following the COnsensus Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guideline and the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology was performed.
A search was performed in PubMed, Medline Complete, CINAHL Plus, Psychology & Behavioral Sciences (via EBSCOHost) and GoogleScholar (last search August 2024).
This review focused on studies that evaluated the measurement properties of instruments to measure the well-being of children ages 2-7 years, published between 2000 and 2023. We excluded studies that used the child well-being instrument as an outcome measure or to validate another instrument.
The methodological quality of eligible studies was evaluated using the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist, the measurement properties of the instruments per study were assessed using the updated criteria for good measurement properties and an overall rating for the measurement property of each instrument is determined and compared against the criteria for good measurement properties. The quality of evidence was evaluated using the modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach, and measurement recommendations were formulated. Results were presented using a narrative synthesis and tables.
Three measures from three studies were included, and they presented moderate to high quality evidence for structural validity, internal consistency and construct validity. However, limited evidence was available for content validity.
Few instruments to measure the well-being of children aged 2-7 years are available, and only three measurement properties were fully evaluated in these studies. This review was conducted even if there was incomplete or unavailable information regarding their content validity. Further research is recommended before these measures may be recommended for use.
CRD42023428953.
本系统评价旨在总结和评估现有儿童福祉测量工具的测量特性。
按照基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)指南和乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的方法,对测量特性进行系统评价。
在PubMed、Medline Complete、CINAHL Plus、心理学与行为科学数据库(通过EBSCOHost)和谷歌学术(最后一次检索时间为2024年8月)中进行检索。
本评价聚焦于2000年至2023年间发表的、评估用于测量2至7岁儿童福祉的工具测量特性的研究。我们排除了将儿童福祉工具用作结局指标或用于验证另一工具的研究。
使用COSMIN偏倚风险清单评估合格研究的方法学质量,根据良好测量特性的更新标准评估每项研究中工具的测量特性,并确定每个工具测量特性的总体评分,并与良好测量特性的标准进行比较。使用改良的推荐分级评估、制定和评价方法评估证据质量,并制定测量建议。结果采用叙述性综合和表格形式呈现。
纳入了三项研究中的三项测量工具,它们为结构效度、内部一致性和构想效度提供了中等到高质量的证据。然而,内容效度的证据有限。
可用于测量2至7岁儿童福祉的工具很少,这些研究中仅对三项测量特性进行了全面评估。即使关于其内容效度的信息不完整或无法获取,仍进行了本评价。在推荐使用这些测量工具之前,建议进行进一步研究。
PROSPERO注册号:CRD42023428953。