Putri Olivinia Qonita, Akinreni Temidayo, Kurniawan Adi Lukas
Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 19;15(4):e088915. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088915.
The scaling-up nutrition (SUN) initiative, which was launched in 2010 to eradicate malnutrition in all its forms by 2030, collaborates with a diverse range of stakeholders, such as governments, non-governmental organisations (NGOs), donors, businesses and academia. Given the widespread adoption of this multisectoral approach, it is crucial to explore methods for evaluating the perspectives of multiple stakeholders in child undernutrition topics.
This scoping review was carried out following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist.
Six peer-reviewed databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase, CINAHL and PROQUEST ASSIA, were systematically searched.
Original English studies published between 1 January 2010 and 1 June 2023, focusing on undernutrition in SUN countries.
Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts and full texts for inclusion and extracted data using Rayyan.
Out of the 4533 articles, 19 met the inclusion criteria for the review, and 5 more were added through manual searches. These studies were conducted in 14 SUN countries, with 62% using mixed methods and the remaining using qualitative methods. Six methods were used to gather stakeholder perspectives, including in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, Net-Map, organisational network analysis and Q methodology. Most studies focused on government, development partners and NGOs, while only two studies involved the business network.
Our study indicates that study on stakeholder perspectives in SUN countries focuses mainly on those showing progress in malnutrition/undernutrition reduction. Future research should explore countries with less progress to improve partnership frameworks. The SUN movement should establish a standard method for evaluating stakeholder perspectives, considering both outcomes and processes.
The final protocol was registered prospectively with the Open Science Framework in July 2023 (https://osf.io/te7cb).
扩大营养（SUN）倡议于2010年发起，旨在到2030年消除所有形式的营养不良，该倡议与政府、非政府组织（NGO）、捐助者、企业和学术界等各种利益相关者合作。鉴于这种多部门方法的广泛采用，探索评估儿童营养不良主题中多个利益相关者观点的方法至关重要。
本范围综述遵循系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目扩展版范围综述清单进行。
系统检索了六个同行评审数据库，包括PubMed、科学网、考克兰、Embase、护理学与健康领域数据库（CINAHL）和亚太地区ProQuest数据库。
2010年1月1日至2023年6月1日发表的聚焦于SUN国家营养不良问题的英文原创研究。
两名评审员独立筛选标题、摘要和全文以确定是否纳入，并使用Rayyan提取数据。
在4533篇文章中，19篇符合综述的纳入标准，通过手工检索又增加了5篇。这些研究在14个SUN国家开展，62%使用混合方法，其余使用定性方法。采用了六种方法来收集利益相关者的观点，包括深入访谈、焦点小组讨论、网络地图法、组织网络分析和Q方法。大多数研究聚焦于政府、发展伙伴和非政府组织，而只有两项研究涉及商业网络。
我们的研究表明，关于SUN国家利益相关者观点的研究主要集中在那些在减少营养不良方面取得进展的国家。未来的研究应探索进展较小的国家，以改进伙伴关系框架。SUN运动应建立一种评估利益相关者观点的标准方法，同时考虑结果和过程。
最终方案于2023年7月在开放科学框架平台上进行了前瞻性注册（https://osf.io/te7cb）。
