Ammann Carole
ETH Zürich, Switzerland.
Sexualities. 2025 Mar;28(3):994-1010. doi: 10.1177/13634607241228113. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
In this article, based on anthropological research conducted in the Netherlands and Switzerland, I show the diversity and multi-faceted nature of GBTIQ+ (gay, bisexual, trans, intersex, and queer) parenting. In contrast to recent research on GBTIQ+ parents, which often distinguishes between parents who have children through a (former) heterosexual encounter, adoption, fostering, surrogacy, co-parenting, or trans pregnancy, I deliberately chose not to study just one form of family formation. Drawing on 37 biographical, narrative, and thematic interviews and two group discussions with GBTIQ+ parents, I adopt a processual understanding of parenting that takes into account its fluidity and transformations over the life course. I argue that we should pay attention to how both the unique ways of forming and being a GBTIQ+ family, and common notions of imagining and doing family, intermingle in practice. Furthermore, I stress the importance of taking into account the intersecting differences within the category of GBTIQ+ parents, and accordingly, we should critically analyze which factors are relevant to an individual in a particular time and space.
在本文中,基于在荷兰和瑞士进行的人类学研究,我展示了GBTIQ+(男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者、双性人及酷儿)育儿方式的多样性和多面性。与近期关于GBTIQ+父母的研究不同,那些研究常常区分通过(前)异性恋关系、收养、寄养、代孕、共同育儿或跨性别怀孕而育有子女的父母,我特意选择不只是研究一种家庭组建形式。通过对37位GBTIQ+父母进行的传记式、叙事式和主题访谈以及两次小组讨论,我采用了一种过程性的育儿理解方式,这种方式考虑到了育儿在人生历程中的流动性和转变。我认为我们应该关注GBTIQ+家庭形成和存在的独特方式与想象及构建家庭的普遍观念在实践中是如何相互交织的。此外,我强调考虑GBTIQ+父母类别中交叉差异的重要性,因此,我们应该批判性地分析哪些因素在特定的时间和空间对个体是相关的。