Qu Dongyi, Yu Jia, Zhou YueHua
Beijing Aier Eye Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ineye Hospital of Chengdu University of TCM, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 4;12:1519992. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1519992. eCollection 2025.
Myopia is a global public issue which is increasing worldwidely. Instruments are essential for measurement in the diagnosis and evaluation of myopia. Comparing the agreement of corneal curvature and eccentricity measurements obtained using four different devices is meaningful for clinical research. We present enrolled 175 patients in this prospective study. The corneal curvature were measured by The Canon RK-F1, Tomey TMS-4, Medmont E300, Pentacam HR, eccentricity measured by last three devices. The agreement and differences were compared among the four instruments. There was a weak correlation between the TMS-4 and Pentacam HR in eccentricity steep (Es) compared to other devices. The Bland-Altman plots with 95% level of agreement showed low agreement of corneal curvature measured by the four instruments. The 95% LoA of K steep (Ks) and K flat (Kf) were > 0.5D for all instruments. For eccentricity, eccentricity mink (Em), also eccentricity flat, showed high agreement among the TMS-4, Pentacam HR, and Medmont E300 topographers, but Es showed low agreement. The agreement of corneal curvature measured by the four instruments was low, which cannot be used interchangeably in clinical practice. The Es obtained from TMS-4, Medmont E300, and Pentacam HR can be used interchangeably.
近视是一个全球性的公共问题,且在全球范围内呈上升趋势。仪器对于近视的诊断和评估测量至关重要。比较使用四种不同设备获得的角膜曲率和偏心度测量结果的一致性,对临床研究具有重要意义。在这项前瞻性研究中,我们纳入了175名患者。角膜曲率由佳能RK-F1、拓普康TMS-4、Medmont E300、眼前节分析仪Pentacam HR测量,偏心度由后三种设备测量。比较了这四种仪器之间的一致性和差异。与其他设备相比,在陡峭偏心度(Es)方面,TMS-4和Pentacam HR之间的相关性较弱。具有95%一致性水平的布兰德-奥特曼图显示,这四种仪器测量的角膜曲率一致性较低。所有仪器的K陡峭值(Ks)和K平坦值(Kf)的95%一致性界限均>0.5D。对于偏心度,最小偏心度(Em),也就是平坦偏心度,在TMS-4、Pentacam HR和Medmont E300地形图仪之间显示出高度一致性,但Es显示出较低的一致性。这四种仪器测量的角膜曲率一致性较低,在临床实践中不能互换使用。从TMS-4、Medmont E300和Pentacam HR获得的Es可以互换使用。