Suppr超能文献

对于修复面积≤3×3平方厘米的肩袖撕裂,使用单个锚钉是否足够?

Is it enough to utilize a single anchor for repair of rotator cuff tears ≤ 3 * 3 cm²?

作者信息

Hawa Ala', Tham Alexander, Bilbrough James, Hayek Christyon, Shenouda Mina, Murrell George A C

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Orthopedics Division, Faculty of Medicine, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan.

Orthopedic Research Institute, St George Hospital Campus, University of New South Wales, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Apr 21;20(4):e0320915. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320915. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Biomechanical studies showed that increasing number of anchors could improve the repair strength of the repaired cuff at time zero.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine if utilizing only a single anchor for a cuff tear repair is sufficient or otherwise to give a similar retear rate and clinical outcome as multiple anchors in a matched group of patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 346 matched consecutive patients (single anchor group, n = 173; multiple anchors group, n = 173) who had cuff tears ≤ 3*3 cm² (mediolateral * anteroposterior diameters) repaired by a single senior surgeon. Ultrasound was used to evaluate the integrity of repair 6 months post-surgery. Patient and surgeon reported outcomes were used to evaluate the clinical outcome of the method used for repair.

RESULTS

6 months post-surgery; the retear rate for cuff tears ≤ 11 cm², tears ≤ 1 cm in mediolateral diameter and > 1 cm in anteroposterior diameter and tears > 1 cm in mediolateral diameter and ≤ 1 cm in anteroposterior diameter was similar in single and multiple anchors groups (4.8%) (3.3%) (P = 1.00), (10.8%) (7.9%) (P = 0.71) and (0%) (0%) respectively. Retear rate for cuff tears > 11 cm² was significantly higher in single anchor group (25.4%) compared to multiple anchors groups (10.9%) (P < 0.05). Operative time was significantly lower in single anchor group (14 minutes) compared to multiple anchors group (20 minutes) (P < 0.05) only for cuff tears ≤ 1*1 cm².

CONCLUSION

6-months post-surgery; there was no significant difference in retear rate or clinical outcome between patients with tears ≤ 33 cm² (mediolateral * anteroposterior diameters) who had their cuff tears repaired using a single anchor compared to those who had their cuff tears repaired using multiple anchors unless both the mediolateral and anteroposterior diameters of the tear were > 1 cm, for which the utilization of multiple anchors showed a significantly lower retear rate at 6 months post-surgery. Operative time was significantly shorter only when a single anchor was used for repair of tears ≤ 11 cm².

摘要

背景

生物力学研究表明,在术后即刻,增加锚钉数量可提高修复的肩袖修复强度。

目的

本研究旨在确定对于肩袖撕裂修复仅使用单个锚钉是否足够,或者说在一组匹配的患者中,其再撕裂率和临床结果是否与使用多个锚钉相似。

研究设计

队列研究;证据等级,3级。

方法

对346例连续匹配患者(单锚钉组,n = 173;多锚钉组,n = 173)进行回顾性分析,这些患者的肩袖撕裂面积≤3×3平方厘米(内外侧×前后径),由同一位资深外科医生进行修复。术后6个月使用超声评估修复的完整性。使用患者和外科医生报告的结果来评估所采用修复方法的临床结果。

结果

术后6个月;对于内外侧直径≤1×1厘米、内外侧直径≤1厘米且前后径>1厘米以及内外侧直径>1厘米且前后径≤1厘米的肩袖撕裂,单锚钉组和多锚钉组的再撕裂率相似(分别为4.8%)(3.3%)(P = 1.00)、(10.8%)(7.9%)(P = 0.71)和(0%)(0%)。对于内外侧直径>1×1厘米的肩袖撕裂,单锚钉组的再撕裂率(25.4%)显著高于多锚钉组(10.9%)(P < 0.05)。仅对于内外侧直径≤1×1厘米的肩袖撕裂,单锚钉组的手术时间(14分钟)显著低于多锚钉组(20分钟)(P < 0.05)。

结论

术后6个月;对于内外侧直径≤3×3平方厘米(内外侧×前后径)的肩袖撕裂患者,使用单个锚钉修复与使用多个锚钉修复相比,再撕裂率或临床结果无显著差异,除非撕裂的内外侧和前后径均大于1厘米,对于这种情况,使用多个锚钉在术后6个月显示出显著更低的再撕裂率。仅在使用单个锚钉修复内外侧直径≤1×1厘米的撕裂时,手术时间显著更短。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d079/12011237/ee524505f9e3/pone.0320915.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验