Takada Yu, Atomi Tomoaki, Yagi Takayuki, Yamamoto Shoma, Tomita Masao, Shimizu Miho, Atomi Yoriko
Department of Rehabilitation, Uno Hospital, Okazaki, Aichi, Japan.
Material Health Science, Graduate School of Engineering, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Koganei, Tokyo, Japan.
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 21;20(4):e0320652. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320652. eCollection 2025.
Step width is a parameter that determines the size of the base of support (BOS) during gait. Further, it is related to the control of center of mass (COM) and trunk movements and gait speed. The current study aimed to validate the effect of conditioning using combined step width (narrow and wide) and gait speed (normal [4.5 km/h] and slow [2.2 km/h]) on the segmental control of the head, thorax, and pelvis with respect to the BOS. The behavior of the head, thorax, and pelvis of 17 healthy adult participants were measured during treadmill walking using a three-dimensional motion analysis system. If the step width was narrow, the whole body segment with a high contribution to COM under narrow BOS conditions was more likely to have a high variability. However, the mediolateral direction behavior was small. On the contrary, if the step width was wide, the whole body segment with a high contribution to COM under wide BOS conditions was more likely to have a low variability. Nevertheless, the mediolateral direction behavior was large. Regarding the intersegmental association, particularly if the step width was narrow and the gait speed was normal, the head showed highly controlled movements with minimal displacement and increased fine-tuning. The thorax displayed significant importance in maintaining trunk stability, operating within a larger range of mediolateral displacement compared to the head and pelvis, under three conditions, except if the step width was narrow and the gait speed was normal. The study underscores the significant impact of both step width and gait speed on the control and stability of high-mass body segments during gait. It suggests that narrow step widths necessitate advanced control strategies, while wide step widths promote simpler, compensatory mechanisms, especially relevant in clinical contexts.
步幅是一个决定步态支撑面(BOS)大小的参数。此外,它与重心(COM)控制、躯干运动和步态速度有关。本研究旨在验证结合步幅(窄步幅和宽步幅)和步态速度(正常[4.5公里/小时]和慢速[2.2公里/小时])进行训练对头部、胸部和骨盆相对于支撑面的节段控制的影响。使用三维运动分析系统在跑步机行走过程中测量了17名健康成年参与者的头部、胸部和骨盆的运动情况。如果步幅较窄,在窄支撑面条件下对重心贡献较大的全身节段更有可能具有较高的变异性。然而,内外侧方向的运动较小。相反,如果步幅较宽,在宽支撑面条件下对重心贡献较大的全身节段更有可能具有较低的变异性。尽管如此,内外侧方向的运动较大。关于节段间的关联,特别是如果步幅较窄且步态速度正常,头部表现出高度受控的运动,位移最小且微调增加。在三种条件下,除了步幅较窄且步态速度正常的情况外,胸部在维持躯干稳定性方面显示出重要作用,其在内外侧位移的较大范围内运动,与头部和骨盆相比。该研究强调了步幅和步态速度对步态中高质量身体节段的控制和稳定性的重大影响。这表明窄步幅需要先进的控制策略,而宽步幅则促进更简单的补偿机制,这在临床环境中尤其相关。