• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管主动脉瓣置换术后传导阻滞患者中比较临时永久性起搏器与临时起搏器的随机对照试验:RECOVER试验的原理与设计

The randomized controlled trial to compare temporary permanent pacemaker vs temporary pacemaker in patients with conduction block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Rationale and design of the RECOVER trial.

作者信息

Jiang Zhengming, Chang Sanshuai, Tao Ling, Luo Jianfang, Fu Guosheng, Wang Yan, Pan Wenzhi, Chen Lianglong, Fang Zhenfei, Li Yan, Bai Ming, Yu Bo, Cheng Xiang, Peng Xiaoping, Jilaihawi Hasan, Piazza Nicolo, Modine Thomas, Song Guangyuan

机构信息

Interventional Center of Valvular Heart Disease, Beijing AnZhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Centre for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China.

Department of Cardiology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2025 Sep;287:41-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2025.04.017. Epub 2025 Apr 19.

DOI:
10.1016/j.ahj.2025.04.017
PMID:40258409
Abstract

RATIONALE

Current guidelines and expert consensus recommend different time thresholds of temporary pacemaker (TM) indwelling in patients with conduction block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Accordingly, this lack of clinical evidence and effective strategies has resulted in extensive variations in permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation patterns, potentially leading to over-early PPM implantation. The use of a temporary permanent pacemaker (TPPM), which involves an active fixation pacing lead and an external pulse generator secured to the skin surface, may be effective and safe in these patients. TPPM may improve postoperative mobility and facilitate early discharge, while providing prolonged and stable pacing for the recovery of conduction block, thereby reducing unnecessary PPM implantation.

DESIGN

The RECOVER trial is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled study comparing TPPM vs TM in patients with conduction block after TAVR. The trial will enroll 160 subjects across 13 sites in China. Inclusion criteria include patients with persistent third-degree atrioventricular block (AVB), second-degree AVB, first-degree AVB with symptoms (PR interval >300 ms), alternating bundle branch block or bifascicular block with syncope/blackness related symptoms occurred during TAVR procedure or within 1 month after TAVR. Enrolled patients will be randomized 1:1 to the TPPM group for a 1-month bridge or the TM group for conventional 24 to 48 hours pacing. The primary effectiveness endpoint is the rate of PPM implantation at 6 months after the occurrence of AVB. Secondary effectiveness endpoint is the rate of PPM implantation at 1 month after the occurrence of AVB. Safety endpoints include all-cause mortality and TPPM/TM/PPM procedure-related complications during the 6-month follow-up. Key data collected will include sociodemographic information, medical history, electrocardiograph, HOLTER, echocardiography, contrast-enhanced cardiac CT, details of procedures and pacemaker interrogation. Indication for PPM implantation will be adjudicated by an independent pacing electrophysiologist committee.

CONCLUSION

The RECOVER trial will evaluate whether TPPM is superior to conventional TM in reducing the rate of PPM implantation in patients with conduction block after TAVR, with a buffer period to distinguish whether conduction block is reversible or persistent.

CURRENT STATUS

The trial is still enrolling participants (with 14 enrolled as of January 1, 2025).

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Randomized controlled trial to compare temporary permanent pacemaker vs temporary pacemaker in patients with conduction block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2400087536. Registered at July 30, 2024. https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=227719.

摘要

理论依据

当前指南和专家共识对经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后传导阻滞患者临时起搏器(TM)留置的时间阈值推荐不同。因此,缺乏临床证据和有效策略导致永久起搏器(PPM)植入模式存在广泛差异,可能导致过早植入PPM。使用临时永久起搏器(TPPM),即采用主动固定起搏导线和固定在皮肤表面的体外脉冲发生器,可能对这些患者有效且安全。TPPM可改善术后活动能力并促进早期出院,同时为传导阻滞的恢复提供长期稳定的起搏,从而减少不必要的PPM植入。

设计

RECOVER试验是一项前瞻性、多中心、开放标签、随机对照研究,比较TAVR后传导阻滞患者中TPPM与TM的效果。该试验将在中国13个地点招募160名受试者。纳入标准包括持续性三度房室传导阻滞(AVB)、二度AVB、有症状的一度AVB(PR间期>300毫秒)、交替性束支传导阻滞或双分支传导阻滞且在TAVR手术期间或TAVR后1个月内出现与晕厥/黑矇相关症状的患者。入组患者将按1:1随机分为接受1个月桥接的TPPM组或接受常规24至48小时起搏的TM组。主要有效性终点是AVB发生后6个月时PPM植入率。次要有效性终点是AVB发生后1个月时PPM植入率。安全性终点包括6个月随访期间的全因死亡率和TPPM/TM/PPM手术相关并发症。收集的关键数据将包括社会人口统计学信息、病史、心电图、动态心电图、超声心动图、心脏增强CT、手术细节和起搏器问询情况。PPM植入指征将由独立的起搏电生理学家委员会判定。

结论

RECOVER试验将评估TPPM在降低TAVR后传导阻滞患者PPM植入率方面是否优于传统TM,并设有缓冲期以区分传导阻滞是可逆还是持续的。

当前状态

该试验仍在招募参与者(截至2025年1月1日已招募14名)。

试验注册

比较经导管主动脉瓣置换术后传导阻滞患者临时永久起搏器与临时起搏器的随机对照试验。中国临床试验注册中心ChiCTR2400087536。于2024年7月30日注册。https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=227719。

相似文献

1
The randomized controlled trial to compare temporary permanent pacemaker vs temporary pacemaker in patients with conduction block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Rationale and design of the RECOVER trial.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后传导阻滞患者中比较临时永久性起搏器与临时起搏器的随机对照试验:RECOVER试验的原理与设计
Am Heart J. 2025 Sep;287:41-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2025.04.017. Epub 2025 Apr 19.
2
Permanent pacemaker reduction using temporary-permanent pacemaker as a 1-month bridge after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a prospective, multicentre, single-arm, observational study.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后使用临时-永久起搏器作为1个月过渡的永久起搏器减容:一项前瞻性、多中心、单臂观察性研究
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 May 15;72:102603. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102603. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
[Feasibility study of using bridging temporary permanent pacemaker in patients with high-degree atrioventricular block after TAVR].[经导管主动脉瓣置换术后高度房室传导阻滞患者应用桥接临时永久起搏器的可行性研究]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2023 Jun 24;51(6):648-655. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20221116-00898.
4
Permanent-temporary pacemakers in the management of patients with conduction abnormalities after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.永久-临时起搏器在经导管主动脉瓣置换术后传导异常患者管理中的应用
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2018 Jun;52(1):111-116. doi: 10.1007/s10840-018-0345-z. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
5
Feasibility study of temporary permanent pacemaker in patients with conduction block after TAVR.经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后传导阻滞患者使用临时永久起搏器的可行性研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jan 25;10:978394. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.978394. eCollection 2023.
6
Predictors of right ventricular pacing and pacemaker dependence in transcatheter aortic valve replacement patients.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者右心室起搏及起搏器依赖的预测因素
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2018 Jan;51(1):77-86. doi: 10.1007/s10840-017-0303-1. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
7
Long-term percentage of ventricular pacing in patients requiring pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A multicenter 10-year experience.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后需要植入起搏器的患者中,长期心室起搏的比例:一项多中心 10 年经验。
Heart Rhythm. 2020 Nov;17(11):1897-1903. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.05.040. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
8
Utility of 30-Day Continuous Ambulatory Monitoring to Identify Patients With Delayed Occurrence of Atrioventricular Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后 30 天连续动态监测对诊断房室传导阻滞迟发的作用。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Dec;12(12):e007635. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007635. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
9
Predictors for new-onset conduction block in patients with pure native aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a new-generation self-expanding valve (VitaFlow Liberty): a retrospective cohort study.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后新发传导阻滞的预测因素:新一代自膨式瓣膜(VitaFlow Liberty)治疗单纯原发性主动脉瓣反流的回顾性队列研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Jan 28;24(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-03735-z.
10
Predictors of conduction recovery after permanent pacemaker implantation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后永久起搏器植入后传导恢复的预测因素。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021 Aug;61(2):365-374. doi: 10.1007/s10840-020-00813-y. Epub 2020 Jul 15.