Rocco A G, Raymond S A, Murray E, Dhingra U, Freiberger D
Anesth Analg. 1985 Sep;64(9):917-23.
The differential levels of sensory blockade of pinprick, cold, and touch were monitored throughout the course of spinal anesthesia administered to 50 patients to determine variations in the degree of spread during onset, plateau, and regression, and to establish the effects of epinephrine and the effect of posture during injection. A significant difference was observed between the dermatomal level of sensory loss of touch and the dermatomal level of loss of either pinprick or cold during onset, at 5 min in patients given tetracaine with epinephrine, at time of maximum spread in patients given tetracaine with epinephrine or in the sitting position, and in all groups during regression. Loss of touch began later, never extended as far cephalad, and regressed sooner. The extent of this difference was greatest during regression, when the anesthetic was given to patients in the sitting position, after epinephrine. The level at which the sense of touch was lost seemed to mark the limits of the zone of solid spinal anesthesia; these limits could not be assessed effectively using pinprick. We propose that loss of touch sensation be used to assess whether anesthesia is adequate to avoid tourniquet pain. If there is loss of touch sensation above the L1 dermatome, it is unlikely that tourniquet pain will occur.
在对50例患者实施脊髓麻醉的过程中,监测了针刺、冷觉和触觉的不同感觉阻滞水平,以确定在起效、平台期和消退期扩散程度的变化,并确定肾上腺素的作用以及注射时体位的影响。在给予丁卡因加肾上腺素的患者中,起效5分钟时,在给予丁卡因加肾上腺素的患者或处于坐位的患者达到最大扩散时,以及在所有组消退期间,触觉感觉丧失的皮节水平与针刺或冷觉丧失的皮节水平之间观察到显著差异。触觉丧失开始较晚,从未延伸到那么高的节段,并且消退更快。这种差异的程度在消退期最大,此时在坐位给患者使用肾上腺素后给予麻醉剂。触觉丧失的水平似乎标志着坚实脊髓麻醉区域的界限;使用针刺无法有效评估这些界限。我们建议使用触觉丧失来评估麻醉是否足以避免止血带疼痛。如果在L1皮节以上存在触觉丧失,则不太可能发生止血带疼痛。