Della Volpe Antonio, Bruno Chiara, De Luca Pietro, Ralli Massimo, Di Stadio Arianna
Otolaryngology Department, Santobono-Posillipon Hospital, Via Mario Fiore 6, 80129, Naples, Italy.
Department of Otolaryngology, Tiberina-Isola Gemelli Hospital, Via di Ponte Quattro capi, 39, 00186, Rome, Italy.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Jun;282(6):3075-3083. doi: 10.1007/s00405-025-09375-z. Epub 2025 Apr 21.
Inflammations of the upper respiratory tract (URT) are common both in adults and children and they are generally treated using aerosol therapy with mucolytic medications and steroids. When these inflammations affect children, the treatment must be rapid and resolutive to prevent complications. Steroids present some contraindications, i.e. alteration of smell, that must be considered especially in children. Therefore, alternative treatments that have similar efficacy but limited adverse effects should be considered. This study aims at evaluating the efficacy of Adelmidrol to treat inflammation of the URT in children.
Case-Control study. Control group used standard treatment for URT inflammation (mucolytics and steroids); treatment groups were treated by Adelmidrol spray. Sixty children (age range 2.5-4.5 years) were randomly assigned to (i) control group, (ii) treatment group 1 (TG1)- Adelmidrol nasal spray only and (iii) treatment group 2 (TG2), in which Adelmidrol was administered in both nasal and oral spray solution. The URT and the tympanic membrane were evaluated at T0, T1 (30 days) and T2 (90 days). The treatments were performed for 90 consecutive days.
At the end of the treatment, TG2 (combination of nasal and oral sprays) had the best outcomes both on URT findings (χ²: p = 0.0004) and tympanic membrane conditions (χ²: p = 0.03). TG1 showed similar outcome of CG.
These preliminary results in our group of 60 children showed that Adelmidrol had the same efficacy of standard treatment when used as nasal spray only and was better than the standard treatment when used combining nasal and oral sprays. The molecule seems to offer the same benefit of standard treatment without side effects. If confirmed on a larger sample, the use of Adelmidrol could be suggested as an alternative to traditional treatment for the inflammation of URT in children.
上呼吸道(URT)炎症在成人和儿童中都很常见,通常使用黏液溶解药物和类固醇进行雾化治疗。当这些炎症影响儿童时,治疗必须迅速且有效,以防止并发症。类固醇存在一些禁忌症,如嗅觉改变,这在儿童中尤其需要考虑。因此,应考虑具有相似疗效但副作用有限的替代治疗方法。本研究旨在评估阿德米多(Adelmidrol)治疗儿童URT炎症的疗效。
病例对照研究。对照组采用URT炎症的标准治疗方法(黏液溶解剂和类固醇);治疗组采用阿德米多喷雾治疗。60名儿童(年龄范围2.5 - 4.5岁)被随机分配到:(i)对照组,(ii)治疗组1(TG1)——仅使用阿德米多鼻喷雾剂,以及(iii)治疗组2(TG2),其中阿德米多通过鼻喷雾剂和口服喷雾剂给药。在T0、T1(30天)和T2(90天)对URT和鼓膜进行评估。治疗连续进行90天。
治疗结束时,TG2(鼻喷雾剂和口服喷雾剂联合使用)在URT检查结果(χ²:p = 0.0004)和鼓膜状况(χ²:p = 0.03)方面都有最佳结果。TG1显示出与CG相似的结果。
我们这组60名儿童的这些初步结果表明,阿德米多仅用作鼻喷雾剂时具有与标准治疗相同的疗效,而鼻喷雾剂和口服喷雾剂联合使用时优于标准治疗。该分子似乎提供了与标准治疗相同的益处且无副作用。如果在更大样本上得到证实,可建议使用阿德米多作为儿童URT炎症传统治疗的替代方法。