Hallali P, Haiat R
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 1985 Jun;34(6):401-4.
The anatomical and experimental data clearly show that transmural myocardial infarction does not always produce a pathological Q wave on the ECG, but may sometimes only cause abnormalities of the ST segment and the T wave. Conversely, a sub-endocardial myocardial infarction may present with pathological Q waves. Schematically, the histology of transmural myocardial infarction usually reveals so-called coagulation necrosis, while sub-endocardial myocardial infarction generally corresponds to myofibrillary degeneration (contraction band necrosis), which promotes a reperfusion process. Very often, however, the histological appearance is not so clear-cut and the features tend to overlap. Consequently, in practice, it does not seem justified to use the electrocardiogram as a basis to distinguish between transmural and sub-endocardial infarctions, in terms of prognosis, or to select possible candidates for coronary angiography following a first myocardial infarction.
解剖学和实验数据清楚地表明,透壁性心肌梗死在心电图上并不总是产生病理性Q波,有时可能仅导致ST段和T波异常。相反,心内膜下心肌梗死可能出现病理性Q波。从示意图来看,透壁性心肌梗死的组织学通常显示所谓的凝固性坏死,而心内膜下心肌梗死一般对应于肌原纤维变性(收缩带坏死),这会促进再灌注过程。然而,很多时候组织学表现并非如此清晰明确,其特征往往相互重叠。因此,在实践中,就预后而言,以心电图为依据区分透壁性和心内膜下梗死,或在首次心肌梗死后选择可能进行冠状动脉造影的患者,似乎并不合理。