Fennessy Seán, McGarvey Caoimhe, McDermott Edel, Burns Richéal, Redmond Patrick
Gastroenterology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr 22;12(1):e001744. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001744.
The integration of digital health technologies in gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy presents opportunities to enhance patient experience, an important dimension of care quality. This systematic review aims to evaluate the impact of digital health interventions on patient satisfaction and experience in outpatient endoscopy settings.
A systematic review and narrative synthesis were conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.
PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, PsycInfo, and Cochrane databases were searched through 9 March 2023.
Studies were eligible if they involved adult patients (≥18 years) undergoing outpatient colonoscopy or gastroscopy and in English. Interventions included any form of educational digital health technology aimed at enhancing healthcare delivery. Telehealth studies were not included.
Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias, using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. A mixed-method approach was employed for the narrative synthesis, focusing on the primary outcome of patient experience and satisfaction.
Nine studies met the inclusion criteria, all assessing patient satisfaction rather than experience. Five studies reported improved satisfaction associated with digital interventions, three showed no significant change, and one lacked statistical analysis. Interventions ranged from smartphone applications to online educational resources, and satisfaction measurement tools varied significantly. Overall, the evidence was characterised by heterogeneity and very low methodological quality.
Digital health interventions may have a positive impact on patient satisfaction in GI endoscopy, although evidence quality is very low and outcome measurement is inconsistent. Future research should focus on standardising measures of patient experience and satisfaction, ensuring robust study designs to inform the integration of digital health tools into endoscopy practice.
CRD42023428609.
将数字健康技术整合到胃肠(GI)内镜检查中为提升患者体验提供了契机,而患者体验是护理质量的一个重要方面。本系统评价旨在评估数字健康干预措施对门诊内镜检查患者满意度和体验的影响。
按照《系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)2020指南》以及《推荐分级的评估、制定与评价(GRADE)方法》进行系统评价和叙述性综合分析。
检索了截至2023年3月9日的PubMed/Medline、EMBASE、PsycInfo和Cochrane数据库。
研究对象为接受门诊结肠镜检查或胃镜检查的成年患者(≥18岁)且研究语言为英语,则该研究符合要求。干预措施包括旨在改善医疗服务的任何形式的教育性数字健康技术。远程医疗研究未纳入。
两名独立的评审员使用混合方法评估工具提取数据并评估偏倚风险。采用混合方法进行叙述性综合分析,重点关注患者体验和满意度的主要结果。
9项研究符合纳入标准,所有研究均评估患者满意度而非体验。5项研究报告称数字干预措施使满意度提高,3项研究显示无显著变化,1项研究缺乏统计分析。干预措施范围从智能手机应用程序到在线教育资源,满意度测量工具差异很大。总体而言,证据具有异质性且方法学质量非常低。
数字健康干预措施可能对胃肠内镜检查患者的满意度产生积极影响,尽管证据质量非常低且结果测量不一致。未来的研究应侧重于标准化患者体验和满意度的测量方法,确保有强有力的研究设计,为将数字健康工具整合到内镜检查实践中提供依据。
PROSPERO注册号:CRD42023428609。