Neill W A, Branch L G, De Jong G, Smith N E, Hogan C A, Corcoran P J, Jette A M, Balasco E M, Osberg S
Arch Intern Med. 1985 Sep;145(9):1642-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.145.9.1642.
We studied 100 men with clinically stable coronary heart disease. Their capacity for exertion as defined by treadmill test was compared with the physical and social avocational activities they carried out in their daily routine, as reported by them. Exercise capacity (treadmill time) was strongly correlated with a physician's independent assessment of symptomatic status (anginal history). Although participation in some relatively strenuous elective activities was related slightly to exercise capacity, participation in many household duties and social undertakings bore no relationship to exercise capacity or to other measures of the severity of the underlying heart disease. The patients' own perceptions of their cardiac limitation varied for different activities and for some activities it was determined as much by their own concern and outside advice as by cardiac symptoms. Decreased capacity for exertion seems to exert surprisingly little influence on a cardiac patient's daily routine and interventions aimed at altering one of these measures of performance will not necessarily affect the other.
我们研究了100名临床症状稳定的冠心病男性患者。通过跑步机测试所定义的他们的运动能力,与他们所报告的日常进行的身体和社会业余活动进行了比较。运动能力(跑步机测试时间)与医生对症状状态(心绞痛病史)的独立评估密切相关。尽管参与一些相对剧烈的选择性活动与运动能力略有相关,但参与许多家务和社会事务与运动能力或潜在心脏病严重程度的其他指标并无关联。患者对自身心脏功能限制的认知因不同活动而异,对于某些活动,其认知更多地取决于自身关注和外部建议,而非心脏症状。运动能力下降似乎对心脏病患者的日常生活影响出奇地小,旨在改变其中一项表现指标的干预措施不一定会影响另一项。