Hori M, Takahashi H, Konno T, Inoue J, Haba T
Bone. 1985;6(3):147-54. doi: 10.1016/8756-3282(85)90047-x.
Labeling patterns were classified after double bone labeling of four male beagles, 10 months of age. Calcein and oxytetracycline were given on the 18th and the 7th day prior to simultaneous iliac and 11th rib biopsies. Undecalcified sections stained with the Villanueva bone stain were studied by epifluorescence microscopy. Five structures were identified and classified: the first or green label, the interlabel layer of mineralized bone, the second or yellow label, the post double-labeled mineralized bone layer, and osteoid seams. Doubly plus singly labeled surface equalled 40.8 +/- 8.4% of the total trabecular surface of the ilium. Doubly labeled surface as a percent of the total labeled surfaces equaled 55.5% in trabeculae and 68.1% in osteons, whereas green first-singly labeled surface equaled 24.2% and 11.9%, respectively, and yellow second-singly labeled surface equaled 20.3% and 20.0%, respectively. Unequivocal examples appeared in both biopsy sites of all four dogs of bone-forming systems that lacked one or the other label, or both, and also of systems in which cessation of mineralization or of new matrix formation occurred between the two labels and between the second label and the day of biopsy. The findings prove that the On-Off states in active bone-forming sites that have been postulated by other investigators do exist. Since widely different labeling patterns appeared in different bone-forming centers in the same bone and the same animal, a local factor rather than a systemic one should control those differences at the level of the BMU.
对4只10月龄雄性比格犬进行双侧骨标记后,对标记模式进行分类。在同时进行髂骨和第11肋活检前第18天和第7天分别给予钙黄绿素和土霉素。用Villanueva骨染色法对未脱钙切片进行荧光显微镜研究。识别并分类了五种结构:第一个或绿色标记、矿化骨的标记间层、第二个或黄色标记、双标记后矿化骨层和类骨质缝。双标记加单标记表面占髂骨小梁总表面的40.8±8.4%。双标记表面占总标记表面的百分比在小梁中为55.5%,在骨单位中为68.1%,而绿色首次单标记表面分别为24.2%和11.9%,黄色第二次单标记表面分别为20.3%和20.0%。在所有四只狗的两个活检部位都出现了明确的例子,即骨形成系统缺乏一种或另一种标记,或两者都缺乏,以及在两个标记之间以及第二个标记与活检日之间发生矿化或新基质形成停止的系统。这些发现证明了其他研究者所假设的活跃骨形成部位的开-关状态确实存在。由于在同一动物的同一骨的不同骨形成中心出现了广泛不同的标记模式,一个局部因素而非全身因素应该在骨多细胞单位水平控制这些差异。