Newton Laura E, Ponukumati Aravind, Zwain Gabrielle, Korves Caroline, Mao Jialin, Moore Kayla, Arya Shipra, Alabi Olamide, Scali Salvatore, Greenleaf Erin, Stone David, Spangler Emily, Goodney Philip
Department of Surgical Services, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont.
Department of General Surgery, Dartmouth Health, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e256852. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.6852.
Guidelines recommend annual imaging surveillance after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). How these guidelines translate into practice among veterans remains poorly described.
To characterize post-EVAR surveillance among veterans.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated veterans who underwent EVAR between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2023, at US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals and received follow-up care at VA and non-VA hospitals and imaging centers with payment via Medicare or the VA. Veterans treated with EVAR in VA hospitals during the study period were included.
Years after EVAR.
The primary outcome was annual surveillance adherence, measured as 1 or more imaging studies in the abdomen or pelvis each year after EVAR. Stepwise logistic regression modeling was used to determine factors associated with poor adherence. Secondary outcomes were imaging type (cross-sectional, ultrasonography, or ultrasonography followed by cross-sectional imaging) and factors associated with lower adherence.
The cohort included 27 792 veterans (27 624 male [99.4%]; 22 521 aged ≥65 years [81.0%]). Mean (SD) follow-up was 6.0 (4.0) years. The mean (SD) proportion of time that veterans were surveillance adherent was 71.1% (28.5%). Surveillance was initially high, with 25 026 of 27 792 veterans (90.0%) undergoing surveillance imaging in year 1 after EVAR. However, this proportion decreased further out from EVAR, with 12 401 of 21 384 veterans (58.0%) undergoing surveillance imaging by year 4 after EVAR. Veterans were most likely to undergo imaging with computed tomography scans (21 911 veterans [78.8%]). However, the proportion with surveillance via ultrasonography alone increased from 823 of 25 026 veterans (3.3%) in year 1 after EVAR to 2567 of 12 401 veterans (20.7%) in year 4 after EVAR. White race (odds ratio [OR] vs all other racial groups, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72-0.98), married status (OR vs all other social status categories, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71-0.89), having a service-connected disability (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.62-0.77), and a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index score (OR per 1-unit increase, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.91-0.95) were associated with lower odds of poor surveillance adherence.
In this study, post-EVAR imaging surveillance was high, although surveillance lapses were more likely further out from EVAR and for patients with certain characteristics. This information may inform future patient-centered efforts to improve post-EVAR imaging adherence.
指南建议在血管内腹主动脉瘤修复术(EVAR)后进行年度影像监测。这些指南在退伍军人中如何转化为实际行动仍鲜为人知。
描述退伍军人中EVAR术后的监测情况。
设计、设置和参与者:这项回顾性队列研究评估了2000年1月1日至2023年12月31日期间在美国退伍军人事务部(VA)医院接受EVAR治疗,并在VA医院、非VA医院和影像中心接受后续护理且通过医疗保险或VA支付费用的退伍军人。纳入了研究期间在VA医院接受EVAR治疗的退伍军人。
EVAR术后的年份。
主要结局是年度监测依从性,定义为EVAR术后每年进行1次或更多次腹部或盆腔影像检查。采用逐步逻辑回归模型确定与依从性差相关的因素。次要结局是影像类型(横断面成像、超声检查或超声检查后进行横断面成像)以及与较低依从性相关的因素。
该队列包括27792名退伍军人(27624名男性[99.4%];22521名年龄≥65岁[81.0%])。平均(标准差)随访时间为6.0(4.0)年。退伍军人监测依从的平均(标准差)时间比例为71.1%(28.5%)。监测最初的比例较高,27792名退伍军人中有25026名(90.0%)在EVAR术后第1年接受了监测影像检查。然而,从EVAR术后开始,这一比例进一步下降,到EVAR术后第4年,21384名退伍军人中有12401名(58.0%)接受了监测影像检查。退伍军人最常接受计算机断层扫描成像(21911名退伍军人[78.8%])。然而,仅通过超声检查进行监测的比例从EVAR术后第1年的25026名退伍军人中的823名(3.3%)增加到EVAR术后第4年的12401名退伍军人中的2�67名(20.7%)。白人种族(与所有其他种族群体相比,优势比[OR]为0.84;95%置信区间[CI]为0.72 - 0.98)、已婚状态(与所有其他社会状态类别相比,OR为0.80;95% CI为0.71 - 0.89)、患有与服役相关的残疾(OR为0.69;95% CI为0.62 - 0.77)以及较高的查尔森合并症指数评分(每增加1个单位的OR为0.93;95% CI为0.91 - 0.95)与监测依从性差的较低可能性相关。
在本研究中,EVAR术后的影像监测比例较高,尽管监测失误在距EVAR术后时间更长以及某些特定特征的患者中更有可能发生。这些信息可能为未来以患者为中心提高EVAR术后影像依从性的努力提供参考。