Ghasemi Omid, Yilmaz Onurcan, Isler Ozan, Terry Jenny, Ross Robert M
Institute for Climate Risk and Response, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Department of Psychology, Kadir Has University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Apr 24. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02691-9.
In the present study, we tested three hypotheses about relationships between reflective thinking, intuitive thinking (both measured using the Cognitive Reflection Test; CRT), and belief in God or gods (BiG) in university students across 19 culturally and geographically diverse countries (n = 7,771). In support of our first hypothesis, we found a negative relationship between reflective thinking and BiG; and in support of our second hypothesis, we found a positive relationship between intuitive thinking and BiG. Contrary to our third hypothesis, we found no evidence that measuring CRT prior to measuring BiG decreased BiG. Given that this is the first large cross-cultural test of these hypotheses to have a preregistered analysis plan, the first to hold education constant across countries, and the first to use both Bayesian and frequentist methods, these results considerably bolster the evidence in support of the first two hypotheses and against the third hypothesis.
在本研究中,我们对来自19个文化和地理背景各异的国家的大学生(n = 7771)进行了三项假设测试,这些假设涉及反思性思维、直觉性思维(均使用认知反思测试;CRT)与对上帝或诸神的信仰(BiG)之间的关系。支持我们的第一个假设,我们发现反思性思维与BiG之间存在负相关;支持我们的第二个假设,我们发现直觉性思维与BiG之间存在正相关。与我们的第三个假设相反,我们没有发现证据表明在测量BiG之前测量CRT会降低BiG。鉴于这是对这些假设进行的首次大规模跨文化测试,且有预先注册的分析计划,首次在各国保持教育因素不变,并且首次同时使用贝叶斯方法和频率论方法,这些结果极大地支持了前两个假设的证据,并反对了第三个假设。