Ntais Christos, Melanthiou Yioula, Talias Michael A
Healthcare Management Program, School of Economics & Management, Open University of Cyprus, Nicosia 2220, Cyprus;
Epidemiology Program, School of Science and Technology, Hellenic Open University, 26335 Patras, Greece.
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2025 Apr 2;13(2):13. doi: 10.3390/jmahp13020013. eCollection 2025 Jun.
Medical cannabis continues to generate interest as a potential therapeutic option, yet its acceptance in clinical practice faces challenges, including regulatory barriers, social stigma, and gaps in scientific evidence.
This study explores the perspectives of Greek medical doctors and pharmacists on medical cannabis-key stakeholders in its clinical application-through semi-structured interviews with 12 participants from each profession.
Medical doctors and pharmacists expressed a range of views on medical cannabis, with many acknowledging its potential while emphasizing the need for rigorous, disease-specific research. Medical doctors highlighted the lack of consistent clinical trials, concerns about drug interactions, and the fine line between medical use and misuse. Pharmacists echoed these concerns, citing regulatory inconsistencies and the need for standardized dosing. Both groups agreed that social stigma and misinformation hinder cannabis adoption, advocating for targeted education and transparent research communication. Participants indicated that regulatory barriers also pose challenges, with calls for harmonized policies and phased market entry approaches. Effective communication strategies, including digital outreach and clear messaging, were suggested to differentiate medical cannabis from recreational use and improve trust among healthcare providers and patients. Participants also highlighted the urgent need for collaboration between policymakers, researchers, and healthcare professionals to establish medical cannabis as a credible therapeutic option.
The insights gained provide actionable recommendations to bridge existing gaps and emphasize the need for a responsible, evidence-based approach to the acceptance of medical cannabis as a therapeutic option.
医用大麻作为一种潜在的治疗选择,持续引发人们的兴趣,然而其在临床实践中的接受度面临诸多挑战,包括监管障碍、社会污名以及科学证据方面的空白。
本研究通过对来自希腊的医生和药剂师这两个医用大麻临床应用关键利益相关方群体中的各12名参与者进行半结构化访谈,来探究他们对医用大麻的看法。
医生和药剂师对医用大麻表达了一系列观点,许多人认可其潜力,同时强调需要针对特定疾病进行严谨研究。医生们强调缺乏一致的临床试验、对药物相互作用的担忧,以及医疗用途与滥用之间的细微界限。药剂师也表达了这些担忧,指出监管不一致以及需要标准化剂量。两组都认为社会污名和错误信息阻碍了大麻的应用,主张开展有针对性的教育以及进行透明的研究沟通。参与者表示监管障碍也带来挑战,呼吁制定统一政策和分阶段的市场准入方式。建议采用有效的沟通策略,包括数字推广和清晰的信息传达,以区分医用大麻和娱乐用大麻,并增强医疗服务提供者与患者之间的信任。参与者还强调政策制定者、研究人员和医疗专业人员之间迫切需要开展合作,以使医用大麻成为一种可靠的治疗选择。
所获得的见解提供了可采取行动的建议,以弥合现有差距,并强调需要采取一种负责任的、基于证据的方法来接受医用大麻作为一种治疗选择。