Almorad Alexandre, Del Monte Alvise, Della Rocca Domenico Giovanni, Pannone Luigi, Audiat Charles, Scacciavillani Roberto, Marcon Lorenzo, Nakasone Kazutaka, Vetta Giampaolo, Overeinder Ingrid, Bala Gezim, Sorgente Antonio, Ströker Erwin, Sieira Juan, Mouram Sahar, El Haddad Milad, Hossein Amin, Awada Ahmad, de Asmundis Carlo, Chierchia Gian-Battista
Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Heart Rhythm Research Brussels, Postgraduate Program in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, European Reference Networks Guard-Heart, Brussels, Belgium.
Independent Researcher, Helsinki, Finland.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Apr 10;12:1525819. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1525819. eCollection 2025.
Effective balloon positionnking during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with a radiofrequency balloon (RFB) is crucial for optimal energy delivery, maximising lesion formation, and preventing gaps. Traditionally, fluoroscopy is used to guide pulmonary vein (PV) occlusion, however, this method exposes patients to radiation. Recently, RFBs equipped with 3D electroanatomical mapping (EAM) offer an alternative approach, potentially achieving the same results with reduced radiation exposure. Our main aim was to evaluate procedural characteristics, such as acute isolation and time-to-isolation (TTI), when the RFB is positioned based only on fluoroscopy feedback vs. fluoroscopy and a 3D-EAM. The secondary objective was to assess PVI durability through mandated remapping in asymptomatic patients from both groups.
A total of 60 patients were enrolled and underwent either a fluoroscopy-guided (FLUO, 30 patients) or fluoroscopy + 3D-EAM (3D-MAP, 30 patients) ablation. In each group, 15 patients without any documented recurrence underwent protocol-mandated repeat 3D-EAM six months after the index ablation. Procedural outcomes, lesion metrics, and safety profiles were assessed and compared between groups.
At a median follow-up of 579 days, freedom from any atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATAs) was 89.7% in the FLUO group and 92.3% in the 3D-EAM group ( > 0.05). The latter was associated with significantly reduced fluoroscopy exposure (median 10.5 vs. 7.0 min, < 0.005). Procedure time and efficacy metrics, including single-shot isolation rates and TTI, were comparable between groups. Durable PVI on a per PV basis was present in 54/60 (90%) vs. 57/60 (94%) of PVs in the FLUO and 3D-EAM groups, respectively ( = 0.9).
Radiofrequency balloon led to a high rate of durable PVI whether its guided by fluoroscopy only or 3D mapping. The latter allowed avoiding dye comsuption and a reduction of fluoroscopic times.
在使用射频球囊(RFB)进行肺静脉隔离(PVI)期间,有效的球囊定位对于优化能量传递、最大化病灶形成以及防止间隙至关重要。传统上,荧光透视法用于引导肺静脉(PV)闭塞,然而,这种方法会使患者暴露于辐射中。最近,配备三维电解剖标测(EAM)的RFB提供了一种替代方法,有可能在减少辐射暴露的情况下取得相同的效果。我们的主要目的是评估仅基于荧光透视反馈与荧光透视和三维EAM定位RFB时的手术特征,如急性隔离和隔离时间(TTI)。次要目标是通过对两组无症状患者进行强制重新标测来评估PVI的持久性。
共纳入60例患者,分别接受荧光透视引导(FLUO,30例患者)或荧光透视 + 三维EAM(三维MAP,30例患者)消融。每组中,15例无任何复发记录的患者在初次消融后6个月接受方案规定的重复三维EAM检查。评估并比较两组之间的手术结果、病灶指标和安全性。
在中位随访579天时,FLUO组无任何房性快速心律失常(ATA)的比例为89.7%,三维EAM组为92.3%(>0.05)。后者与荧光透视暴露显著减少相关(中位时间10.5分钟对7.0分钟,<0.005)。两组之间的手术时间和疗效指标,包括单次隔离率和TTI,具有可比性。FLUO组和三维EAM组分别有54/60(90%)和57/60(94%)的PV实现了基于每个PV的持久PVI(=0.9)。
无论仅由荧光透视还是三维标测引导,射频球囊都能实现较高的持久PVI率。后者可避免染料消耗并减少荧光透视时间。