Yang Xi-Yue, Huang Li-Fang, Han Yue-Jian, Cen Xiao-Xin
Department of Diagnostic Ultrasound, Guigang People's Hospital, Guangxi, China.
Department of Pathology, Guigang People's Hospital, Guigang, Guangxi, China.
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2025 Apr 24;80:100657. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2025.100657. eCollection 2025.
To determine the malignancy risk of thyroid nodules with Isolated Macrocalcifications (IMC) based on surgical results and evaluate the postoperative risk of malignant nodules with IMC.
A total of 46 thyroid nodules with IMC were enrolled from 3680 consecutive patients who underwent thyroidectomy between August 2018 and September 2023. The malignancy risk of IMC nodules, postoperative risk of malignant nodules, and whether the ultrasonic features of IMC (smooth, lobulated, or focal disruption of the anterior margin) were associated with malignancy were investigated. The nodules were further divided into three groups (group A, maximum diameter < 10 mm; group B, maximum diameter of 10‒14 mm and group C, maximum diameter ≥ 15 mm). Differences in malignancy and Lymph Node Metastasis (LNM) risks were also evaluated among the three groups.
The malignancy risk of the IMC nodules was 30.43% (14/46). Four patients developed LNM. Eight nodules were staged as T1aN0M0 and low-risk, whereas six nodules were staged as T1bN1aM0 and intermediate-risk. Focal disruption of the anterior margin of IMC was significantly associated with malignancy. Malignant and LNM risk showed no differences among nodules with different sizes.
IMC nodules with different sizes had a lower intermediate risk of malignancy and exhibited the same aggressive behavior. The cutoff value of these nodules for further Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) warranted further investigation. Interruption of IMC was more often seen in malignant nodules, and more attention should be paid to these nodules.
根据手术结果确定孤立性粗大钙化(IMC)甲状腺结节的恶性风险,并评估IMC恶性结节的术后风险。
从2018年8月至2023年9月期间连续接受甲状腺切除术的3680例患者中纳入46个具有IMC的甲状腺结节。研究IMC结节的恶性风险、恶性结节的术后风险以及IMC的超声特征(前缘光滑、分叶或局灶性中断)是否与恶性相关。结节进一步分为三组(A组,最大直径<10 mm;B组,最大直径为10-14 mm;C组,最大直径≥15 mm)。还评估了三组之间恶性和淋巴结转移(LNM)风险的差异。
IMC结节的恶性风险为30.43%(14/46)。4例患者发生LNM。8个结节分期为T1aN0M0且为低风险,而6个结节分期为T1bN1aM0且为中风险。IMC前缘的局灶性中断与恶性显著相关。不同大小的结节在恶性和LNM风险方面无差异。
不同大小的IMC结节具有较低的中度恶性风险,且表现出相同的侵袭性行为。这些结节进一步细针穿刺活检(FNA)的临界值值得进一步研究。IMC中断在恶性结节中更常见,应更多关注这些结节。