• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作团队中协作解决问题过程中的心流体验的人格差异。

Personality differences in flow experience during collaborative problem solving in work teams.

作者信息

Buseyne Siem, Danquigny Thierry, Depaepe Fien, Heutte Jean, Raes Annelies

机构信息

KU Leuven, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Centre for Instructional Psychology & Technology, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven, imec research group itec, Kortrijk, Belgium; ULR 4354 - CIREL - Centre Interuniversitaire de Recherche en Education de Lille, Université de Lille, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France.

ULR 4354 - CIREL - Centre Interuniversitaire de Recherche en Education de Lille, Université de Lille, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France.

出版信息

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2025 Jun;256:105032. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105032. Epub 2025 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105032
PMID:40280020
Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between team members' personality traits and their perceived individual and team flow in collaborative problem-solving (CPS) contexts. Flow, a state of optimal experience, enhances motivation, performance, and satisfaction, benefiting both individuals and teams. Using multilevel regression analysis, we examined data from 60 participants across 15 work teams performing two CPS tasks, assessing individual and team flow separately. Linear regression revealed no noteworthy links between personality domains and individual flow. However, curvilinear analyses revealed various insights, with U-shaped relationships observed for Extraversion, indicating that individuals with either low or high levels of Extraversion tend to experience higher individual flow than those with moderate levels of this trait. Altruism/Agreeableness, while unrelated to individual flow, showed significant linear relationships with various team flow dimensions, including open communication and sense of unity. For team flow as well, curvilinear analyses revealed similar U-shaped relationships, mainly observed for Extraversion. The findings illustrate the nuanced role of personality in CPS and highlight the value of exploring curvilinear relationships besides linear relationships. Future research should examine the mechanisms underlying these relationships and their generalizability across contexts.

摘要

本研究调查了团队成员的人格特质与他们在协作解决问题(CPS)情境中所感知到的个人和团队心流之间的关系。心流是一种最佳体验状态,能增强动机、提高绩效并提升满意度,对个人和团队都有益处。我们运用多层次回归分析,对来自15个工作团队的60名参与者在执行两项CPS任务时的数据进行了检验,分别评估个人心流和团队心流。线性回归显示人格领域与个人心流之间没有显著关联。然而,曲线分析揭示了各种见解,外向性呈现出U形关系,表明外向性水平低或高的个体往往比该特质水平中等的个体体验到更高的个人心流。利他性/宜人性虽然与个人心流无关,但与包括开放沟通和团结感在内的各种团队心流维度呈现出显著的线性关系。对于团队心流,曲线分析也揭示了类似的U形关系,主要体现在外向性方面。研究结果说明了人格在CPS中的微妙作用,并强调了除线性关系外探索曲线关系的价值。未来的研究应考察这些关系背后的机制及其在不同情境中的普遍性。

相似文献

1
Personality differences in flow experience during collaborative problem solving in work teams.工作团队中协作解决问题过程中的心流体验的人格差异。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2025 Jun;256:105032. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105032. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
2
Problem-Solving Phase Transitions During Team Collaboration.团队协作过程中的问题解决相变
Cogn Sci. 2018 Jan;42(1):129-167. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12482. Epub 2017 Feb 18.
3
When opposites attract: a multi-sample demonstration of complementary person-team fit on extraversion.当性格相反的人相互吸引:外向性互补的人-团队匹配度的多样本论证
J Pers. 2005 Aug;73(4):935-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00334.x.
4
Can we get some cooperation around here? The mediating role of group norms on the relationship between team personality and individual helping behaviors.我们能在这里合作一下吗?群体规范在团队人格与个体帮助行为关系中的中介作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2014 Sep;99(5):988-99. doi: 10.1037/a0037278. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
5
Multiscale movement coordination dynamics in collaborative team problem solving.协作团队解决问题中的多尺度运动协调动力学。
Appl Ergon. 2019 Sep;79:143-151. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.07.007. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
6
Personality characteristics that are valued in teams: Not always "more is better"?团队中受重视的人格特征:并非“越多越好”?
Int J Psychol. 2019 Oct;54(5):638-649. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12511. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
7
Leader-team complementarity: Exploring the interactive effects of leader personality traits and team power distance values on team processes and performance.领导团队互补性:探究领导人格特质和团队权力距离价值观对团队流程和绩效的交互影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Jun;102(6):935-955. doi: 10.1037/apl0000203. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
8
Peering into the team role kaleidoscope: the interplay of personal characteristics and verbal interactions in collaborative problem solving.审视团队角色万花筒:协作解决问题中个人特质与言语互动的相互作用。
Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 16;15:1345892. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1345892. eCollection 2024.
9
The impact of team empowerment on proactivity: the moderating roles of leader's emotional intelligence and proactive personality.团队授权对主动性的影响:领导情绪智力和主动性人格的调节作用。
J Health Organ Manag. 2012;26(4-5):560-77. doi: 10.1108/14777261211256918.
10
Personality and problem-solving in common mynas (Acridotheres tristis).家八哥(Acridotheres tristis)的个性与问题解决能力
Behav Processes. 2017 Jan;134:87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.09.013. Epub 2016 Oct 4.