• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

审视团队角色万花筒:协作解决问题中个人特质与言语互动的相互作用。

Peering into the team role kaleidoscope: the interplay of personal characteristics and verbal interactions in collaborative problem solving.

作者信息

Buseyne Siem, Vrijdags Amelie, Said-Metwaly Sameh, Danquigny Thierry, Heutte Jean, Depaepe Fien, Raes Annelies

机构信息

KU Leuven, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Centre for Instructional Psychology & Technology, Leuven, Belgium.

KU Leuven, imec research group itec, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 16;15:1345892. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1345892. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1345892
PMID:39351116
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11440957/
Abstract

The objective of this study is to explore the relationship between personality and peer-rated team role behavior on the one hand and team role behavior and verbal behavior on the other hand. To achieve this, different data types were collected in fifteen professional teams of four members ( = 60) from various private and public organizations in Flanders, Belgium. Participants' personalities were assessed using a workplace-contextualized personality questionnaire based on the Big Five, including domains and facets. Typical team role behavior was assessed by the team members using the Team Role Experience and Orientation peer rating system. Verbal interactions of nine of the teams ( = 36) were recorded in an educational lab setting, where participants performed several collaborative problem-solving tasks as part of a training. To process these audio data, a coding scheme for collaborative problem solving and linguistic inquiry and word count were used. We identified robust links and logical correlation patterns between personality traits and typical team role behaviors, complementing prior research that only focused on self-reported team behavior. For instance, a relatively strong correlation was found between Altruism and the Team builder role. Next, the study reveals that role taking within teams is associated with specific verbal interaction patterns. For example, members identified as Organizers were more engaged in responding to others' ideas and monitoring execution.

摘要

本研究的目的一方面是探讨个性与同伴评定的团队角色行为之间的关系,另一方面是探讨团队角色行为与言语行为之间的关系。为实现这一目标,从比利时弗拉芒地区的各类私营和公共组织的15个由4名成员组成的专业团队(共60人)中收集了不同类型的数据。使用基于大五人格的工作场所情境化人格问卷对参与者的个性进行评估,包括领域和方面。团队成员使用团队角色经验和取向同伴评级系统对典型的团队角色行为进行评估。其中9个团队(共36人)的言语互动在教育实验室环境中进行记录,参与者在该环境中作为培训的一部分执行了几项协作式问题解决任务。为处理这些音频数据,使用了协作式问题解决编码方案以及语言查询和词频统计。我们确定了人格特质与典型团队角色行为之间的稳固联系和逻辑相关模式,补充了之前仅关注自我报告团队行为的研究。例如,利他主义与团队建设者角色之间存在相对较强的相关性。接下来,研究表明团队内部的角色承担与特定的言语互动模式相关。例如,被认定为组织者的成员更积极地回应他人的想法并监控执行情况。

相似文献

1
Peering into the team role kaleidoscope: the interplay of personal characteristics and verbal interactions in collaborative problem solving.审视团队角色万花筒:协作解决问题中个人特质与言语互动的相互作用。
Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 16;15:1345892. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1345892. eCollection 2024.
2
Corrigendum: Peering into the team role kaleidoscope: the interplay of personal characteristics and verbal interactions in collaborative problem solving.勘误:审视团队角色万花筒:协作解决问题中个人特质与言语互动的相互作用。
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 18;15:1538778. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1538778. eCollection 2024.
3
Personality differences in flow experience during collaborative problem solving in work teams.工作团队中协作解决问题过程中的心流体验的人格差异。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2025 Jun;256:105032. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105032. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
4
Healthcare teams as complex adaptive systems: understanding team behaviour through team members' perception of interpersonal interaction.作为复杂适应系统的医疗团队:通过团队成员对人际互动的感知来理解团队行为。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 20;18(1):570. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3392-3.
5
Perceived contribution of a hybrid serious game to the development of collaborative problem solving among undergraduate nursing students: A mixed method design.混合式严肃游戏对提升本科护生协作问题解决能力的作用感知:混合方法设计
Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Nov;73:103794. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103794. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
6
Complex Problem Solving in Teams: The Impact of Collective Orientation on Team Process Demands.团队中的复杂问题解决:集体导向对团队过程要求的影响。
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 29;8:1730. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01730. eCollection 2017.
7
Team Dynamics and Collaborative Problem-Solving for Lunar Construction: Lessons From Complex Construction Scenarios on Earth.月球建设中的团队动态与协作式问题解决:来自地球上复杂建设场景的经验教训。
Hum Factors. 2024 May;66(5):1616-1632. doi: 10.1177/00187208221148610. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
8
Multi-Level Linguistic Alignment in a Dynamic Collaborative Problem-Solving Task.多层次语言对齐在动态协作问题解决任务中的应用。
Cogn Sci. 2024 Jan;48(1):e13398. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13398.
9
What Differences Make a Difference? The Promise and Reality of Diverse Teams in Organizations.差异为何有差异?组织中多元化团队的承诺与现实。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2005 Oct;6(2):31-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2005.00022.x. Epub 2005 Oct 1.
10
Role of lean leadership in the lean maturity-second-order problem-solving relationship: a mixed methods study.精益领导力在精益成熟度-二阶问题解决关系中的作用:一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 3;9(6):e026737. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026737.

本文引用的文献

1
Natural Language Analysis and the Psychology of Verbal Behavior: The Past, Present, and Future States of the Field.自然语言分析与言语行为心理学:该领域的过去、现在与未来状况
J Lang Soc Psychol. 2021 Jan;40(1):21-41. doi: 10.1177/0261927x20967028. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
2
Collaborative problem-solving education for the twenty-first-century workforce.面向21世纪劳动力的协作式问题解决教育。
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Jun;2(6):367-369. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0363-y.
3
Advancing the Science of Collaborative Problem Solving.推进协作问题解决科学。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2018 Nov;19(2):59-92. doi: 10.1177/1529100618808244.
4
Personality characteristics that are valued in teams: Not always "more is better"?团队中受重视的人格特征:并非“越多越好”?
Int J Psychol. 2019 Oct;54(5):638-649. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12511. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
5
The team role test: development and validation of a team role knowledge situational judgment test.团队角色测试:团队角色知识情境判断测试的开发与验证
J Appl Psychol. 2008 Mar;93(2):250-67. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.250.
6
The mini-IPIP scales: tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality.迷你国际个性项目池量表:对人格五因素的微小却有效的测量工具。
Psychol Assess. 2006 Jun;18(2):192-203. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192.
7
The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.分类数据观察者一致性的测量。
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74.