• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家八哥(Acridotheres tristis)的个性与问题解决能力

Personality and problem-solving in common mynas (Acridotheres tristis).

作者信息

Lermite Françoise, Peneaux Chloé, Griffin Andrea S

机构信息

School of psychology, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.

出版信息

Behav Processes. 2017 Jan;134:87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.09.013. Epub 2016 Oct 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2016.09.013
PMID:27717852
Abstract

Animals show consistent individual differences in behaviour across time and/or contexts. Recently, it has been suggested that proactive personality types might also exhibit fast cognitive styles. The speed with which individuals sample environmental cues is one way in which correlations between personality and cognition might arise. Here, we measured a collection of behavioural traits (competitiveness, neophobia, neophilia, task-directed motivation and exploration) in common mynas (Acridotheres tristis) and measured their relationship with problem solving. We predicted that fast solving mynas would interact with (i.e. sample) the problem solving task at higher rates, but also be more competitive, less neophobic, more neophilic, and more exploratory. Mynas that were faster to solve a novel foraging problem were no more competitive around food and no more inclined to take risks. Unexpectedly, these fast-solving mynas had higher rates of interactions with the task, but also displayed lower levels of exploration. It is possible that a negative relation between problem solving and spatial exploration arose as a consequence of how inter-individual variation in exploration was quantified. We discuss the need for greater consensus on how to measure exploratory behaviour before we can advance our understanding of relationships between cognition and personality more effectively.

摘要

动物在行为上会表现出跨越时间和/或情境的一致个体差异。最近,有人提出积极主动的性格类型可能也会展现出快速的认知风格。个体对环境线索进行采样的速度是性格与认知之间可能产生关联的一种方式。在此,我们测量了家八哥(Acridotheres tristis)的一系列行为特征(竞争力、新事物恐惧、新事物喜好、任务导向动机和探索行为),并测量了它们与解决问题能力之间的关系。我们预测,解决问题速度快的家八哥会以更高的频率与(即采样)解决问题任务进行互动,而且会更具竞争力、更少新事物恐惧、更多新事物喜好且更具探索性。解决新觅食问题速度更快的家八哥在食物周围并不更具竞争力,也没有更倾向于冒险。出乎意料的是,这些解决问题速度快的家八哥与任务的互动频率更高,但探索水平也更低。解决问题与空间探索之间的负相关关系有可能是由于对探索行为个体间差异的量化方式所导致的。我们讨论了在能够更有效地推进我们对认知与性格之间关系的理解之前,在如何测量探索行为方面达成更大共识的必要性。

相似文献

1
Personality and problem-solving in common mynas (Acridotheres tristis).家八哥(Acridotheres tristis)的个性与问题解决能力
Behav Processes. 2017 Jan;134:87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.09.013. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
2
Adjusting foraging strategies: a comparison of rural and urban common mynas (Acridotheres tristis).调整觅食策略:农村和城市家八哥(Acridotheres tristis)的比较。
Anim Cogn. 2017 Jan;20(1):65-74. doi: 10.1007/s10071-016-1045-7. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
3
Exploring or avoiding novel food resources? The novelty conflict in an invasive bird.探索还是回避新的食物资源?入侵鸟类中的新奇冲突
PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19535. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019535. Epub 2011 May 18.
4
Personality-dependent differences in problem-solving performance in a social context reflect foraging strategies.社会环境中解决问题表现的个性依赖差异反映了觅食策略。
Behav Processes. 2017 Jan;134:95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.09.007. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
5
Tracking changing environments: innovators are fast, but not flexible learners.跟踪变化的环境:创新者行动迅速,但学习不够灵活。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 31;8(12):e84907. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084907. eCollection 2013.
6
Personality and problem-solving performance explain competitive ability in the wild.个性和解决问题的能力决定了野生动物的竞争能力。
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Mar 22;279(1731):1168-75. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.1539. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
7
Inter-individual and age differences in exploration, neophobia and problem-solving ability in a Neotropical raptor (Milvago chimango).个体间和年龄差异对新热带猛禽(栗鸢)探索、新事物恐惧和解决问题能力的影响。
Anim Cogn. 2010 Sep;13(5):701-10. doi: 10.1007/s10071-010-0319-8. Epub 2010 Mar 19.
8
Eradication of common mynas Acridotheres tristis from Denis Island, Seychelles.从塞舌尔群岛的德尼岛根除家八哥(Acridotheres tristis)。
Pest Manag Sci. 2017 Feb;73(2):295-304. doi: 10.1002/ps.4263. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
9
Can you teach an old parrot new tricks? Cognitive development in wild kaka (Nestor meridionalis).老鹦鹉能学新把戏吗?野生卡卡鹦鹉(啄羊鹦鹉)的认知发展。
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Jun 15;283(1832). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.3056.
10
Specialist enemies, generalist weapons and the potential spread of exotic pathogens: malaria parasites in a highly invasive bird.专家型天敌、通用型武器与外来病原体的潜在传播:高度入侵性鸟类体内的疟原虫
Int J Parasitol. 2015 Dec;45(14):891-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2015.08.008. Epub 2015 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Bold zebrafish (Danio rerio) learn faster in a classical associative learning task.大胆的斑马鱼(Danio rerio)在经典联想学习任务中学习速度更快。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 10;15(1):16331. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00423-6.
2
A reinvestigation of cognitive styles in sticklebacks: decision success varies with behavioral type.棘鱼认知风格的重新研究:决策成功率因行为类型而异。
Behav Ecol. 2024 Nov 25;36(1):arae097. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arae097. eCollection 2025 Jan-Feb.
3
Persistence associated with extractive foraging explains variation in innovation in Darwin's finches.
与取食性觅食相关的持久性解释了达尔文雀创新行为的差异。
Behav Ecol. 2023 Oct 28;35(1):arad090. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arad090. eCollection 2024 Jan-Feb.
4
Sex differences in longitudinal personality stability in chimpanzees.黑猩猩纵向人格稳定性的性别差异。
Evol Hum Sci. 2020 Sep 9;2:e46. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2020.45. eCollection 2020.
5
Innovative problem-solving in a small, wild canid.小型野生犬科动物的创新问题解决能力。
Anim Cogn. 2023 Mar;26(2):405-413. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01678-6. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
6
Problem Solving in Animals: Proposal for an Ontogenetic Perspective.动物的问题解决:个体发生学视角的提议
Animals (Basel). 2021 Mar 18;11(3):866. doi: 10.3390/ani11030866.
7
Characterizing innovators: Ecological and individual predictors of problem-solving performance.描述创新者的特征:解决问题的表现的生态和个体预测因素。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 12;14(6):e0217464. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217464. eCollection 2019.
8
Captive jays exhibit reduced problem-solving performance compared to wild conspecifics.与野生同类相比,圈养松鸦的解决问题能力有所下降。
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Jan 16;6(1):181311. doi: 10.1098/rsos.181311. eCollection 2019 Jan.
9
Copy-the-majority of instances or individuals? Two approaches to the majority and their consequences for conformist decision-making.复制多数实例或个体?多数的两种方法及其对从众决策的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 25;14(1):e0210748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210748. eCollection 2019.
10
Are generalists more innovative than specialists? A comparison of innovative abilities in two wild sympatric mouse lemur species.通才比专才更具创新性吗?对两种同域野生小鼠狐猴物种创新能力的比较。
R Soc Open Sci. 2018 Aug 15;5(8):180480. doi: 10.1098/rsos.180480. eCollection 2018 Aug.